The Mazda CX-5 and Skoda Karoq enter a competitive arena with their compelling blend of style, practicality, and performance. The CX-5 captivates with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, while the Karoq impresses with its spacious interior and user-friendly technology features. Ultimately, the choice between these two SUVs will depend on whether you prioritize sporty handling or versatile functionality.
In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-5 and Skoda Karoq stand out as formidable contenders. Both vehicles boast innovative technology, robust performance, and elegant designs. This article compares these two popular models across various parameters to help you decide which one suits your driving needs best.
The Mazda CX-5 measures 4575 mm in length, 1845 mm in width, and 1680 mm in height, which gives it a commanding road presence. In contrast, the Skoda Karoq is slightly smaller, with a length of 4390 mm and a width of 1841 mm. Both SUVs feature a modern design, but the CX-5 leans towards a sportier look, while the Karoq embodies a more practical and robust aesthetic.
The Mazda CX-5 offers a range of powertrains, including a petrol MHEV and diesel engines, delivering power outputs from 150 to 194 HP. In comparison, the Skoda Karoq is equally versatile, offering petrol and diesel engines with power ranging from 115 to 190 HP. Both models come equipped with either manual or automatic transmissions, with the Karoq highlighting its advanced DSG automatic gearbox in some configurations.
When it comes to performance, the Karoq excels with its quicker acceleration times. The Karoq can go from 0-100 km/h in as little as 7 seconds, while the CX-5 ranges from 9.2 to 11.1 seconds, depending on the engine. The top speed of the Karoq reaches 221 km/h, surpassing the CX-5's top speed of 208 km/h, making it a bit sportier in terms of raw performance.
Fuel economy remains a critical concern for many buyers today. The Karoq showcases superior efficiency, with consumption figures as low as 4.9 L/100 km. The CX-5, while slightly thirstier, still offers competitive figures ranging from 5.6 to 7.6 L/100 km. This efficiency may tilt the scale in favor of the Karoq for budget-conscious buyers.
Inside, both SUVs provide spacious cabins with high-quality materials. The CX-5 is renowned for its driver-centric layout and luxurious appointments, while the Karoq shines with its functionality and clever storage solutions. Both vehicles offer a digital infotainment system that supports smartphone connectivity and various driver-assistance features, ensuring a safe and engaging driving experience.
The CX-5 features a trunk capacity of 522 liters, marginally exceeding the Karoq's 521 liters, making them fairly comparable in terms of cargo space. Both SUVs come standard with spacious seating for five, but the Karoq’s interior flexibility is notable, allowing for easy reconfiguration of rear seats for maximum cargo room.
Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and Skoda Karoq ultimately comes down to personal preference. If performance and luxury are your top priorities, the CX-5 might be the more appealing choice. Conversely, if fuel efficiency, practicality, and a sporty edge in acceleration are more critical to you, the Skoda Karoq could be your best bet. Regardless of your choice, both SUVs promise a delightful driving experience.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 27600 - 44300
£
|
Price
about 28400 - 41000
£
|
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 7.6
L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 7.6
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
146 - 173
g/km
|
co2
129 - 174
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 58
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 55
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1567 - 1800
kg
|
Curb weight
1364 - 1608
kg
|
Trunk capacity
510 - 522
L
|
Trunk capacity
521
L
|
Length
4575
mm
|
Length
4384 - 4390
mm
|
Width
1845
mm
|
Width
1841
mm
|
Height
1680
mm
|
Height
1603 - 1624
mm
|
Payload
434 - 508
kg
|
Payload
426 - 573
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
150 - 194
HP
|
Power HP
115 - 190
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.2 - 11.1
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 10.6
s
|
Max Speed
188 - 208
km/h
|
Max Speed
193 - 221
km/h
|
Torque
213 - 445
Nm
|
Torque
200 - 360
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Power kW
110 - 143
kW
|
Power kW
85 - 140
kW
|
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488
cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1984
cm3
|
Top speed
188 - 208
km/h
|
Top speed
193 - 221
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2021 - 2022
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Skoda
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.