In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Skoda Karoq and VW T-Roc present two compelling options for buyers seeking style and practicality. While the Karoq boasts a more spacious interior and generous cargo capacity, the T-Roc stands out with its sporty design and engaging driving dynamics. Ultimately, the choice between these two models will depend on individual preferences for versatility versus flair.
The Skoda Karoq and the VW T-Roc are two compelling offerings in the compact SUV segment, blending practicality with impressive performance. Both vehicles are designed to meet the diverse needs of modern drivers, but they have distinct characteristics that set them apart. This comparison will delve into their technical aspects, innovations, and overall performance.
When it comes to dimensions, the Skoda Karoq measures 4,390 mm in length, while the VW T-Roc comes in at 4,236 mm to 4,271 mm, depending on the configuration. The Karoq's wider stance at 1,841 mm gives it a more robust appearance compared to the T-Roc, which ranges from 1,811 mm to 1,819 mm in width. Both models offer ample interior space, but the Karoq excels with a trunk capacity of 521 liters, significantly outpacing the T-Roc's maximum of 445 liters.
Under the hood, both SUVs provide a solid selection of engine options. The Skoda Karoq is available with petrol and diesel engines ranging from 115 HP to 190 HP, while the T-Roc offers a broader range, including a powerful 300 HP variant. The Karoq’s engines provide a balanced mix of performance and efficiency, achieving a fuel consumption as low as 4.9 L/100 km, whereas the T-Roc can reach as low as 4.7 L/100 km, depending on the engine configuration.
Both models come equipped with manual and automatic transmission options, including dual-clutch systems. The Karoq offers front-wheel and all-wheel drive variants, similar to the T-Roc, providing versatility for varied driving conditions. The T-Roc impressively features an optional 4Motion all-wheel-drive system, elevating its performance on challenging terrains.
Acceleration figures highlight the competitive nature of these SUVs. The Skoda Karoq achieves 0-100 km/h times between 7 to 10.6 seconds, while the VW T-Roc boasts quicker times, with some configurations as low as 4.9 seconds. However, the Karoq’s top speeds can reach up to 221 km/h, richer than some T-Roc models which max out at 218 km/h.
In terms of technology, both vehicles are equipped with features aimed at enhancing comfort and safety. The Karoq boasts a spacious cabin with advanced infotainment systems, touch-sensitive controls, and a plethora of driver-assistance features such as adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist. The T-Roc, on the other hand, offers a more modern design aesthetic with customizable ambient lighting and an innovative digital cockpit, giving it a technology edge in user interface personalization.
Both models are engineered with efficiency in mind. The Karoq has CO2 emissions ranging from 129 to 174 g/km, while the T-Roc ranges from 125 to 250 g/km. The Karoq generally sits in the D to F efficiency classes, whereas the T-Roc falls within D to G, marking a slight edge for Skoda in environmental performance, particularly in the lower emissions range.
Ultimately, the choice between the Skoda Karoq and the VW T-Roc depends largely on personal preference and specific needs. The Karoq shines in terms of practicality with its spacious trunk and robust engine options, while the T-Roc appeals with its impressive tech features and sporty performance. Whether you're looking for more space or a more dynamic driving experience, both SUVs have a lot to offer in the competitive compact SUV market.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 28400 - 41000
£
|
Price
about 23900 - 45500
£
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 7.6
L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 8.5
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
129 - 174
g/km
|
co2
125 - 194
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 55
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 55
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
2 - 5
|
Curb weight
1364 - 1608
kg
|
Curb weight
1304 - 1578
kg
|
Trunk capacity
521
L
|
Trunk capacity
284 - 445
L
|
Length
4384 - 4390
mm
|
Length
4236 - 4271
mm
|
Width
1841
mm
|
Width
1811 - 1819
mm
|
Height
1603 - 1624
mm
|
Height
1527 - 1584
mm
|
Payload
426 - 573
kg
|
Payload
368 - 509
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
115 - 190
HP
|
Power HP
115 - 300
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 10.6
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 12.3
s
|
Max Speed
193 - 221
km/h
|
Max Speed
187 - 250
km/h
|
Torque
200 - 360
Nm
|
Torque
200 - 400
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Power kW
85 - 140
kW
|
Power kW
85 - 221
kW
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1984
cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1984
cm3
|
Top speed
193 - 221
km/h
|
Top speed
187 - 250
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F, G
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
VW
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.