Skoda VS VW

VS

In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Skoda Karoq and VW T-Roc present two compelling options for buyers seeking style and practicality. While the Karoq boasts a more spacious interior and generous cargo capacity, the T-Roc stands out with its sporty design and engaging driving dynamics. Ultimately, the choice between these two models will depend on individual preferences for versatility versus flair.

Skoda

details

VW

details

The Skoda Karoq and the VW T-Roc are two compelling offerings in the compact SUV segment, blending practicality with impressive performance. Both vehicles are designed to meet the diverse needs of modern drivers, but they have distinct characteristics that set them apart. This comparison will delve into their technical aspects, innovations, and overall performance.

Design and Dimensions

When it comes to dimensions, the Skoda Karoq measures 4,390 mm in length, while the VW T-Roc comes in at 4,236 mm to 4,271 mm, depending on the configuration. The Karoq's wider stance at 1,841 mm gives it a more robust appearance compared to the T-Roc, which ranges from 1,811 mm to 1,819 mm in width. Both models offer ample interior space, but the Karoq excels with a trunk capacity of 521 liters, significantly outpacing the T-Roc's maximum of 445 liters.

Powertrain Options

Under the hood, both SUVs provide a solid selection of engine options. The Skoda Karoq is available with petrol and diesel engines ranging from 115 HP to 190 HP, while the T-Roc offers a broader range, including a powerful 300 HP variant. The Karoq’s engines provide a balanced mix of performance and efficiency, achieving a fuel consumption as low as 4.9 L/100 km, whereas the T-Roc can reach as low as 4.7 L/100 km, depending on the engine configuration.

Transmission and Drivetrain

Both models come equipped with manual and automatic transmission options, including dual-clutch systems. The Karoq offers front-wheel and all-wheel drive variants, similar to the T-Roc, providing versatility for varied driving conditions. The T-Roc impressively features an optional 4Motion all-wheel-drive system, elevating its performance on challenging terrains.

Performance and Handling

Acceleration figures highlight the competitive nature of these SUVs. The Skoda Karoq achieves 0-100 km/h times between 7 to 10.6 seconds, while the VW T-Roc boasts quicker times, with some configurations as low as 4.9 seconds. However, the Karoq’s top speeds can reach up to 221 km/h, richer than some T-Roc models which max out at 218 km/h.

Innovation and Technology

In terms of technology, both vehicles are equipped with features aimed at enhancing comfort and safety. The Karoq boasts a spacious cabin with advanced infotainment systems, touch-sensitive controls, and a plethora of driver-assistance features such as adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist. The T-Roc, on the other hand, offers a more modern design aesthetic with customizable ambient lighting and an innovative digital cockpit, giving it a technology edge in user interface personalization.

Environmental Considerations

Both models are engineered with efficiency in mind. The Karoq has CO2 emissions ranging from 129 to 174 g/km, while the T-Roc ranges from 125 to 250 g/km. The Karoq generally sits in the D to F efficiency classes, whereas the T-Roc falls within D to G, marking a slight edge for Skoda in environmental performance, particularly in the lower emissions range.

Final Verdict

Ultimately, the choice between the Skoda Karoq and the VW T-Roc depends largely on personal preference and specific needs. The Karoq shines in terms of practicality with its spacious trunk and robust engine options, while the T-Roc appeals with its impressive tech features and sporty performance. Whether you're looking for more space or a more dynamic driving experience, both SUVs have a lot to offer in the competitive compact SUV market.

Skoda
VW

Costs and Consumption

Price
about 28400 - 41000 £
Price
about 23900 - 45500 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 7.6 L
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 8.5 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 174 g/km
co2
125 - 194 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 55 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 55 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
4 - 5
Doors
5
Doors
2 - 5
Curb weight
1364 - 1608 kg
Curb weight
1304 - 1578 kg
Trunk capacity
521 L
Trunk capacity
284 - 445 L
Length
4384 - 4390 mm
Length
4236 - 4271 mm
Width
1841 mm
Width
1811 - 1819 mm
Height
1603 - 1624 mm
Height
1527 - 1584 mm
Payload
426 - 573 kg
Payload
368 - 509 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 190 HP
Power HP
115 - 300 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 10.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
193 - 221 km/h
Max Speed
187 - 250 km/h
Torque
200 - 360 Nm
Torque
200 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
85 - 140 kW
Power kW
85 - 221 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1984 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1984 cm3
Top speed
193 - 221 km/h
Top speed
187 - 250 km/h

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F, G
Brand
Skoda
Brand
VW

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.