In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Ford Kuga shines with its dynamic driving experience and advanced technological features, making it a favorite among enthusiasts. In contrast, the Skoda Karoq impresses with its practicality and spacious interior, offering exceptional comfort for families. While the Kuga leans towards a sportier appeal, the Karoq excels in functionality, catering to different customer preferences in this highly sought-after market.
The SUV market continues to grow, with consumers increasingly seeking vehicles that combine versatility, efficiency, and innovative features. Two notable contenders in this space are the Ford Kuga and Skoda Karoq. Both vehicles offer a range of powertrains and tech-savvy amenities to cater to diverse customer needs. In this comparison, we will delve into the technical aspects and innovations of these two SUVs.
The Ford Kuga is available with a choice of petrol, full hybrid, and plug-in hybrid engines, offering flexibility depending on driver preferences. The petrol options provide outputs ranging from 150 to 243 horsepower, while hybrid options lean towards efficiency with emissions as low as 20 g/km. The Kuga also features a variety of transmissions, including a manual gearbox and a CVT automatic, alongside front-wheel and all-wheel drive configurations.
In contrast, the Skoda Karoq offers a lineup that includes both petrol and diesel engines. Power outputs range from 115 to 190 horsepower, with a focus on delivering a balance between performance and fuel efficiency. The Karoq features a manual and a dual-clutch automatic transmission, also available in both front and all-wheel drive setups. With a maximum speed capabilities reaching up to 221 km/h, the Karoq possesses a performance edge in certain variants.
When it comes to fuel efficiency, the Ford Kuga boasts impressive consumption figures, especially in its hybrid variants that can achieve as low as 0.9 L/100 km. The petrol variants consume between 5.3 to 6.4 L/100 km. Its hybrid design also affords an electric range of up to 69 km, allowing for eco-friendly driving in urban environments.
The Skoda Karoq also holds its own in the efficiency department, with consumption figures ranging from 4.9 to 6.1 L/100 km across its various engine options. The diesel options can provide even better economy, appealing to long-distance travelers looking for a fuel-efficient vehicle. Both vehicles are equipped with fuel tank capacities that support longer trips, with the Kuga holding up to 54 L and the Karoq offering up to 55 L.
In terms of size, the Ford Kuga stretches out to lengths between 4604 mm and 4645 mm, while the Skoda Karoq is comparatively compact, measuring from 4384 mm to 4390 mm. The Kuga stands slightly taller than the Karoq, offering a commanding driving position at up to 1681 mm in height against the Karoq’s maximum height of 1624 mm. Both SUVs comfortably seat five passengers, and the Karoq edges ahead in trunk capacity, boasting a generous 521 L compared to the Kuga’s 412 L.
Ford has packed the Kuga with innovative tech features, including Ford's latest SYNC infotainment system, which supports smartphone integration through Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, allowing for seamless connectivity on the go. Active safety features, such as adaptive cruise control and a blind-spot monitor, enhance the driving experience further.
The Skoda Karoq, on the other hand, offers a user-friendly infotainment system, complemented by a range of driver assistance technologies. Notable features include adaptive cruise control, lane assist, and parking sensors that make navigating tight urban areas a breeze. In addition, Skoda’s clever Simply Clever solutions provide practical touches like integrated umbrellas in the doors and a removable flashlight in the boot.
Both the Ford Kuga and Skoda Karoq have their unique strengths, appealing to different segments of the automotive market. The Kuga excels with its hybrid options and advanced technology, making it ideal for environmentally conscious drivers. Conversely, the Karoq shines in spaciousness and practicality, offering a solid dual-fuel mechanical lineup along with innovative storage solutions.
Ultimately, potential buyers should consider their priorities—whether it's performance, technology, or space—when making their choice between these two capable SUVs. Regardless of the choice, both models signify the remarkable versatility and innovation present in today's automotive landscape.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 34200 - 45000
£
|
Price
about 28400 - 41000
£
|
Consumption L/100km
0.9 - 6.4
L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 7.6
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
69
km
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
1.1 - 14.4
kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
20 - 145
g/km
|
co2
129 - 174
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 - 54
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 55
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1526 - 1859
kg
|
Curb weight
1364 - 1608
kg
|
Trunk capacity
412
L
|
Trunk capacity
521
L
|
Length
4604 - 4645
mm
|
Length
4384 - 4390
mm
|
Width
1882
mm
|
Width
1841
mm
|
Height
1673 - 1681
mm
|
Height
1603 - 1624
mm
|
Payload
541 - 550
kg
|
Payload
426 - 573
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
150 - 243
HP
|
Power HP
115 - 190
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.5
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 10.6
s
|
Max Speed
195 - 200
km/h
|
Max Speed
193 - 221
km/h
|
Torque
240
Nm
|
Torque
200 - 360
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Power kW
110 - 178
kW
|
Power kW
85 - 140
kW
|
Engine capacity
1497 - 2488
cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1984
cm3
|
Top speed
195 - 200
km/h
|
Top speed
193 - 221
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Skoda
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.