In the competitive small SUV segment, the Skoda Kamiq and VW Taigo both offer distinctive styles and impressive practicality. While the Kamiq boasts a more spacious interior and a user-friendly infotainment system, the Taigo captivates with its sleek coupe-like design and sporty handling. Drivers seeking versatility and comfort may lean towards the Kamiq, whereas those favoring aesthetics and a dynamic driving experience might prefer the Taigo.
The small SUV market has never been so exciting, with the Skoda Kamiq and VW Taigo vying for dominance in this increasingly popular segment. While both models offer a distinct blend of practicality, technology, and style, they do so with their unique flair. This article delves into the key technical aspects and innovations of these two fantastic offerings.
Both the Skoda Kamiq and VW Taigo are powered by a range of petrol engines, available in 95, 115, and 150 HP variants. The Kamiq provides similar performance figures with its dynamic power delivery, boasting acceleration from 0-100 km/h in as little as 8.3 seconds for the more powerful versions. Meanwhile, the Taigo matches this with an impressive time of 8.2 seconds, showcasing its competitive edge.
When it comes to torque, both models offer 175 Nm for the base engines, while the more potent versions deliver up to 250 Nm. Despite this similarity, the Kamiq's maximum speed reaches 214 km/h, a tick higher than Taigo's top speed of 212 km/h, suggesting a slight edge in high-speed performance.
Fuel efficiency remains a critical factor for modern drivers. The Kamiq excels with consumption figures as low as 5.4 L/100 km, closely followed by the Taigo with a consumption rate of 5.5 L/100 km. Both vehicles share similar CO2 emissions, categorized in the CO2 efficiency class D, making them environmentally friendly options in their category.
In terms of dimensions, the Skoda Kamiq stands at 4241 mm in length, 1793 mm in width, and 1562 mm in height, whereas the VW Taigo is slightly larger, measuring 4266 mm long, 1757 mm wide, and 1518 mm high. The dimension difference translates into practicality; the Taigo offers a trunk capacity of 440 liters compared to the Kamiq's 400 liters, catering well to those needing extra storage space.
Both vehicles hold five seats and pay close attention to driver and passenger comfort. The interior of the Kamiq features a user-friendly infotainment system that is highly intuitive, while the Taigo similarly embraces modern technology, offering a strikingly straightforward interface. Both cars come equipped with modern safety features as standard, including multiple airbags, electronic stability control, and advanced driver assistance systems.
Innovatively, while both models provide a range of connectivity options, the Taigo edges ahead with a fully digital cockpit as an option, giving it an edge in tech appeal and sophistication, catering to the youthful driver focused on trends.
When comparing the driving experience, both vehicles shine in offering smooth rides and refined handling. The Kamiq is built on the MQB platform, which enhances rigidity and stability. The Taigo, also built on the same architecture, provides dynamic handling and a fun-to-drive experience, making both vehicles enjoyable around city streets and bends alike.
Choosing between the Skoda Kamiq and the VW Taigo ultimately comes down to individual preferences. If trunk space and a user-friendly interface are at the top of your list, the Taigo might just have the upper hand. On the other hand, if performance and subtle sophistication attract you, the Kamiq has a commendable offering with its spacious interior and robust build. Both vehicles embody the essence of modern SUVs, making them worthy contenders in today's automotive landscape.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 21700 - 31900
£
|
Price
about 19600 - 31300
£
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.7
L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.8
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
121 - 130
g/km
|
co2
123 - 132
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
50
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
40
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1223 - 1288
kg
|
Curb weight
1229 - 1292
kg
|
Trunk capacity
400
L
|
Trunk capacity
440
L
|
Length
4241
mm
|
Length
4266
mm
|
Width
1793
mm
|
Width
1757
mm
|
Height
1562
mm
|
Height
1518
mm
|
Payload
451 - 463
kg
|
Payload
448 - 457
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
95 - 150
HP
|
Power HP
95 - 150
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 11
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.2 - 11.1
s
|
Max Speed
183 - 214
km/h
|
Max Speed
184 - 212
km/h
|
Torque
175 - 250
Nm
|
Torque
175 - 250
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Power kW
70 - 110
kW
|
Power kW
70 - 110
kW
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1498
cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1498
cm3
|
Top speed
183 - 214
km/h
|
Top speed
184 - 212
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
VW
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.