Compare performance (150 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (21700 £ vs 23600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kamiq or Suzuki Vitara?
As the competition heats up in the compact SUV segment, two formidable contenders stand out for their unique offerings: the Skoda Kamiq and the Suzuki Vitara. Both vehicles are distinct in their features, capabilities, and innovations. Our comprehensive comparison dives deep into the technical aspects and innovations of these two SUVs to help you make an informed choice.
The Skoda Kamiq offers a range of petrol engines including a 1.0-liter three-cylinder, producing between 95 and 150 horsepower. Its top performance variant achieves acceleration from 0-100 km/h in a swift 8.3 seconds and can reach a maximum speed of 214 km/h. The Kamiq’s engine options are paired with either a manual gearbox or a sophisticated dual-clutch automatic transmission.
In contrast, the Suzuki Vitara presents two options encompassing mild-hybrid and full-hybrid variants. The Vitara’s engines offer slightly less horsepower, ranging from 116 to 129 HP, with a most efficient acceleration of 0-100 km/h in 9.5 seconds and a maximum speed of 190 km/h. The Vitara further distinguishes itself with the availability of all-wheel drive for those seeking enhanced traction and versatility.
Both contenders showcase admirable fuel efficiency, slightly favoring the Suzuki Vitara, with average fuel consumption ranging from 5.0 to 5.6 L/100km. The Kamiq follows closely, achieving between 5.5 and 5.7 L/100km. In terms of CO2 emissions, the Vitara offers a range of efficiency classes (D and C) and manages to keep emissions as low as 113 g/km, making it a slightly more eco-friendly option than the Kamiq, which ranges from 121 to 130 g/km and ranks within the D class.
The Skoda Kamiq boasts a slightly longer frame at 4241 mm, compared to the more compact 4185 mm of the Suzuki Vitara. This extensional advantage allows the Kamiq to offer a trunk capacity of 400 liters, superior to the Vitara's ranging between 289 and 375 liters, thus providing extra room for luggage and gear.
Carrying capacity is where the Kamiq once again shines, offering a payload of up to 463 kg, compared to the Vitara's 395 kg. However, the Vitara edges ahead with a higher seating position, thanks to its taller 1595 mm height, providing a driving experience that feels more elevated and commanding.
Skoda’s Kamiq embraces connectivity, integrating modern infotainment systems, which offer seamless smartphone compatibility through Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. The vehicle's refined interior is designed with high-quality materials, highlighting its aesthetic edge.
Suzuki Vitara does not disappoint either, featuring advanced safety technology, including adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist. These innovations make the Vitara a fantastic choice for drivers who prioritize safety and tech-driven convenience.
Choosing between the Skoda Kamiq and the Suzuki Vitara ultimately boils down to personal preferences and priorities. If space, a slightly more powerful engine range, and interior tech take precedence, the Skoda Kamiq could be your go-to choice. Meanwhile, if fuel efficiency, advanced safety features, and hybrid technology are at the top of your list, the Suzuki Vitara beckons with its hybrid innovation and all-wheel-drive capability.
In this tight race, both vehicles proudly carry their brand’s tradition forward and fulfill their stride in the competitive SUV market, ensuring that consumers have compelling choices whichever path they choose.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Skoda Kamiq has a hardly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21700 £ , while the Suzuki Vitara costs 23600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1860 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Suzuki Vitara manages with 5 L and is therefore slight more efficient than the Skoda Kamiq with 5.30 L. The difference is about 0.30 L per 100 km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Suzuki Vitara has a to a small extent edge – offering 184 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 34 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Suzuki Vitara is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Skoda Kamiq takes 8.10 s. That’s about 0.70 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kamiq performs somewhat better – reaching 216 km/h, while the Suzuki Vitara tops out at 190 km/h. The difference is around 26 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Suzuki Vitara pulls slightly stronger with 307 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 57 Nm difference.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Skoda Kamiq is barely noticeable lighter – 1231 kg compared to 1255 kg. The difference is around 24 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kamiq offers minimal more room – 400 L compared to 375 L. That’s a difference of about 25 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kamiq performs to a small extent better – up to 1395 L, which is about 275 L more than the Suzuki Vitara.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Kamiq noticeable takes the win – 539 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 114 kg.
The Suzuki Vitara is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21700 - 31900 £
|
Price
23600 - 36800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.9 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
344 - 426 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
121 - 128 g/km
|
co2
0 - 138 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
47 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1231 - 1340 kg
|
Curb weight
1255 - 1935 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
400 L
|
Trunk capacity
289 - 375 L
|
|
Length
4241 mm
|
Length
4185 mm
|
|
Width
1793 mm
|
Width
1775 - 1800 mm
|
|
Height
1562 mm
|
Height
1595 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1395 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1046 - 1120 L
|
|
Payload
439 - 539 kg
|
Payload
375 - 425 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automated Manual, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
110 - 184 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 12.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
183 - 216 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 - 190 km/h
|
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
Torque
193 - 307 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
81 - 135 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1373 - 1462 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E, A
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España
