Compare performance (150 HP vs 129 HP), boot space and price (21700 £ vs 23600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kamiq or Suzuki Vitara?
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Skoda Kamiq has a hardly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21700 £ , while the Suzuki Vitara costs 23600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1860 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Suzuki Vitara manages with 5 L and is therefore slight more efficient than the Skoda Kamiq with 5.30 L. The difference is about 0.30 L per 100 km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kamiq has a to a small extent edge – offering 150 HP compared to 129 HP. That’s roughly 21 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kamiq is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 8.10 s, while the Suzuki Vitara takes 9.50 s. That’s about 1.40 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kamiq performs somewhat better – reaching 216 km/h, while the Suzuki Vitara tops out at 190 km/h. The difference is around 26 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kamiq pulls minimal stronger with 250 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 15 Nm difference.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Skoda Kamiq is barely noticeable lighter – 1231 kg compared to 1255 kg. The difference is around 24 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kamiq offers minimal more room – 400 L compared to 375 L. That’s a difference of about 25 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kamiq performs to a small extent better – up to 1395 L, which is about 275 L more than the Suzuki Vitara.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Kamiq noticeable takes the win – 539 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 139 kg.
The Skoda Kamiq is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21700 - 31900 £
|
Price
23600 - 30900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.9 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
121 - 128 g/km
|
co2
113 - 138 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
47 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1231 - 1340 kg
|
Curb weight
1255 - 1395 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
400 L
|
Trunk capacity
289 - 375 L
|
|
Length
4241 mm
|
Length
4185 mm
|
|
Width
1793 mm
|
Width
1775 mm
|
|
Height
1562 mm
|
Height
1595 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1395 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1046 - 1120 L
|
|
Payload
439 - 539 kg
|
Payload
375 - 400 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automated Manual, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
110 - 129 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.5 - 12.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
183 - 216 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 - 190 km/h
|
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
Torque
235 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
81 - 95 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1373 - 1462 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.