Compare performance (156 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (22,500 £ vs 23,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Avenger or Suzuki Vitara?
In the ever-evolving world of compact SUVs, the Jeep Avenger and Suzuki Vitara stand out as compelling options for drivers seeking versatility and modern capabilities. With a focus on technical aspects and innovative features, this article provides a detailed comparison of these two vehicles, helping potential buyers make an informed decision.
The Jeep Avenger is available with a range of engine options, including electric, petrol MHEV (mild hybrid), and traditional petrol engines. The electric variant boasts an impressive 400 km range, making it an appealing choice for environmentally conscious consumers. With a peak power output of up to 156 HP and a torque of 260 Nm, the Avenger can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in just 9 seconds, showcasing its performance edge.
On the other hand, the Suzuki Vitara comes equipped with petrol MHEV and full hybrid engines that deliver up to 129 HP and a torque of 235 Nm. While the Vitara's 0 to 100 km/h times vary between 9.5 seconds to 12.7 seconds, it remains competitive in terms of fuel efficiency, achieving up to 5.0 L/100km in optimal conditions. With a maximum speed of 190 km/h, the Vitara proves itself as a brisk performer but trails slightly behind the Avenger in raw acceleration.
When it comes to fuel consumption, the Jeep Avenger's petrol variants offer commendable efficiency, reaching as low as 5.4 L/100km. In contrast, the Vitara excels with a fuel consumption rate as low as 5.0 L/100km, especially with its full hybrid engine options. This factor may appeal more to consumers looking for lower running costs over the long term.
Regarding emissions, the Jeep Avenger's electric variant leads the pack with 0 g/km CO2 emissions, while its petrol offerings fit within the A to C efficiency class range. The Suzuki Vitara, on the other hand, shows emissions from 113 to 129 g/km, placing it primarily in the C to D categories. For eco-conscious consumers, the Avenger presents a distinct advantage.
In terms of size, the Jeep Avenger measures 4084 mm in length and 1776 mm in width, while the Suzuki Vitara comes in slightly longer at 4185 mm, with a width of 1775 mm. Both models offer spacious interiors for five passengers; however, the Avenger provides a trunk capacity of 355 liters compared to Vitara's 375 liters, giving a slight edge in cargo space.
The curb weight for the Avenger ranges from 1180 to 1520 kg, while the Vitara stands at 1255 to 1395 kg. This variance plays a significant role in driving dynamics and ride comfort, with lighter variants generally providing a nimbler feel and evolving efficiency.
Both SUVs are equipped with the latest technologies for a modern driving experience. The Jeep Avenger integrates innovative digital features, including a user-friendly infotainment system with connectivity options such as Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. Additionally, its electric variant comes with advanced charging capabilities and battery management systems, representing Jeep’s commitment to sustainability.
The Suzuki Vitara, while slightly older in design, does not fall short on tech, featuring a robust infotainment system along with driver-assistance features such as adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist. Suzuki has focused on enhancing user experience with reliable and accessible technology, making the Vitara a dependable choice for everyday driving.
Ultimately, choosing between the Jeep Avenger and the Suzuki Vitara comes down to individual preferences. The Avenger shines in power and ecological efficiency with its pure electric option, making it perfect for environmentally minded buyers. In contrast, the Vitara offers a more conventional experience with solid performance, reliability, and generous fuel economy.
Consider your driving habits, environmental impact concerns, and preference for technology when making your choice between these two impressive compact SUVs. With both models showcasing unique strengths, buyers are sure to find an option that fits their lifestyles perfectly.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Jeep Avenger is very slightly cheaper – starting at 22,500 £ , while the Suzuki Vitara costs 23,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,029 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jeep Avenger uses 4.9 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the Suzuki Vitara with 5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Suzuki Vitara is very slightly more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 15.5 kWh/100km for the Jeep Avenger. That’s a difference of about 0.6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Suzuki Vitara offers marginally more range – reaching up to 426 km, about 26 km more than the Jeep Avenger.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Suzuki Vitara offers a bit more power – delivering 184 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 28 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Suzuki Vitara is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Jeep Avenger takes 9 s. That’s about 1.6 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Jeep Avenger is marginally faster – reaching 194 km/h, while the Suzuki Vitara tops out at 190 km/h. The difference is around 4 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Suzuki Vitara delivers somewhat more torque with 307 Nm compared to 260 Nm. That’s about 47 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Jeep Avenger is very slightly lighter – 1,180 kg compared to 1,255 kg. The difference is around 75 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Jeep Avenger offers very slightly more boot space – 380 L compared to 375 L. That’s a difference of about 5 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Jeep Avenger offers moderately more capacity – up to 1,277 L, about 157 L more than the Suzuki Vitara.
When it comes to payload, the Jeep Avenger carries moderately more – 502 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 77 kg.
The Suzuki Vitara is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Jeep Avenger shrinks Jeep's boxy, adventurous styling into a city-friendly electric crossover that looks just as at home on tight streets as it does on muddy weekend lanes. It's a savvy pick for drivers who want go-anywhere attitude without the truck-size ego — practical inside, lively around town and ready to tackle a bit of rough stuff when the mood strikes.
details
The Vitara is a city-smart SUV with a cheeky streak of off-road promise, perfect for drivers who want practicality without pretense. It’s honest, easy to live with and surprisingly likeable, a sensible companion for everyday adventures and weekend escapes.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
22,500 - 36,900 £
|
Price
23,600 - 36,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
400 km
|
Electric Range
344 - 426 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
51 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 129 g/km
|
co2
0 - 138 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
47 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,180 - 1,520 kg
|
Curb weight
1,255 - 1,935 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
325 - 380 L
|
Trunk capacity
289 - 375 L
|
|
Length
4,084 - 4,088 mm
|
Length
4,185 mm
|
|
Width
1,776 mm
|
Width
1,775 - 1,800 mm
|
|
Height
1,527 - 1,541 mm
|
Height
1,595 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,218 - 1,277 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,046 - 1,120 L
|
|
Payload
494 - 502 kg
|
Payload
375 - 425 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automated Manual, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
100 - 156 HP
|
Power HP
110 - 184 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 10.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 12.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
150 - 194 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 - 190 km/h
|
|
Torque
205 - 260 Nm
|
Torque
193 - 307 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
|
Power kW
81 - 135 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,373 - 1,462 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E, A
|
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España