The Jeep Avenger and Suzuki Vitara both present compelling options for urban adventurers, yet they cater to slightly different preferences. While the Avenger boasts a rugged design with electric efficiency, the Vitara leans towards a traditional SUV feel with versatile performance. Ultimately, choosing between them will depend on whether you prioritize cutting-edge technology or a proven, capable drivetrain for diverse terrains.
In the ever-evolving world of compact SUVs, the Jeep Avenger and Suzuki Vitara stand out as compelling options for drivers seeking versatility and modern capabilities. With a focus on technical aspects and innovative features, this article provides a detailed comparison of these two vehicles, helping potential buyers make an informed decision.
The Jeep Avenger is available with a range of engine options, including electric, petrol MHEV (mild hybrid), and traditional petrol engines. The electric variant boasts an impressive 400 km range, making it an appealing choice for environmentally conscious consumers. With a peak power output of up to 156 HP and a torque of 260 Nm, the Avenger can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in just 9 seconds, showcasing its performance edge.
On the other hand, the Suzuki Vitara comes equipped with petrol MHEV and full hybrid engines that deliver up to 129 HP and a torque of 235 Nm. While the Vitara's 0 to 100 km/h times vary between 9.5 seconds to 12.7 seconds, it remains competitive in terms of fuel efficiency, achieving up to 5.0 L/100km in optimal conditions. With a maximum speed of 190 km/h, the Vitara proves itself as a brisk performer but trails slightly behind the Avenger in raw acceleration.
When it comes to fuel consumption, the Jeep Avenger's petrol variants offer commendable efficiency, reaching as low as 5.4 L/100km. In contrast, the Vitara excels with a fuel consumption rate as low as 5.0 L/100km, especially with its full hybrid engine options. This factor may appeal more to consumers looking for lower running costs over the long term.
Regarding emissions, the Jeep Avenger's electric variant leads the pack with 0 g/km CO2 emissions, while its petrol offerings fit within the A to C efficiency class range. The Suzuki Vitara, on the other hand, shows emissions from 113 to 129 g/km, placing it primarily in the C to D categories. For eco-conscious consumers, the Avenger presents a distinct advantage.
In terms of size, the Jeep Avenger measures 4084 mm in length and 1776 mm in width, while the Suzuki Vitara comes in slightly longer at 4185 mm, with a width of 1775 mm. Both models offer spacious interiors for five passengers; however, the Avenger provides a trunk capacity of 355 liters compared to Vitara's 375 liters, giving a slight edge in cargo space.
The curb weight for the Avenger ranges from 1180 to 1520 kg, while the Vitara stands at 1255 to 1395 kg. This variance plays a significant role in driving dynamics and ride comfort, with lighter variants generally providing a nimbler feel and evolving efficiency.
Both SUVs are equipped with the latest technologies for a modern driving experience. The Jeep Avenger integrates innovative digital features, including a user-friendly infotainment system with connectivity options such as Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. Additionally, its electric variant comes with advanced charging capabilities and battery management systems, representing Jeep’s commitment to sustainability.
The Suzuki Vitara, while slightly older in design, does not fall short on tech, featuring a robust infotainment system along with driver-assistance features such as adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist. Suzuki has focused on enhancing user experience with reliable and accessible technology, making the Vitara a dependable choice for everyday driving.
Ultimately, choosing between the Jeep Avenger and the Suzuki Vitara comes down to individual preferences. The Avenger shines in power and ecological efficiency with its pure electric option, making it perfect for environmentally minded buyers. In contrast, the Vitara offers a more conventional experience with solid performance, reliability, and generous fuel economy.
Consider your driving habits, environmental impact concerns, and preference for technology when making your choice between these two impressive compact SUVs. With both models showcasing unique strengths, buyers are sure to find an option that fits their lifestyles perfectly.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 21400 - 37300
£
|
Price
about 23200 - 30400
£
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.7
L
|
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.6
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.4
kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
400
km
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
51
kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
0, 111, 130, 129, 124
g/km
|
co2
113 - 129
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
44
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
47
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1180 - 1520
kg
|
Curb weight
1255 - 1395
kg
|
Trunk capacity
325 - 380
L
|
Trunk capacity
289 - 375
L
|
Length
4084
mm
|
Length
4185
mm
|
Width
1776
mm
|
Width
1775
mm
|
Height
1528 - 1536
mm
|
Height
1595
mm
|
Payload
394 - 502
kg
|
Payload
375 - 395
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automated Manual
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
100 - 156
HP
|
Power HP
116 - 129
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 10.9
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.5 - 12.7
s
|
Max Speed
150 - 194
km/h
|
Max Speed
180 - 190
km/h
|
Torque
205 - 260
Nm
|
Torque
235
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Power kW
74 - 115
kW
|
Power kW
85 - 95
kW
|
Engine capacity
1199
cm3
|
Engine capacity
1373 - 1462
cm3
|
Top speed
150 - 194
km/h
|
Top speed
180 - 190
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2023 - 2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.