In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Suzuki Vitara and Toyota Yaris Cross stand out with their distinct characteristics. While the Vitara offers a rugged exterior and versatile interior space, the Yaris Cross impresses with its hybrid efficiency and advanced safety features. Ultimately, the choice between these two models boils down to whether you prioritize off-road capability or urban fuel economy.
The compact SUV segment has witnessed a surge in popularity over the past years, thanks to the blend of practicality, efficiency, and style that these vehicles bring to the table. In this article, we will delve into a detailed comparison of two notable contenders: the Suzuki Vitara and the Toyota Yaris Cross. Both models showcase unique technologies, efficiency, and comfort, making them appealing choices for a variety of drivers.
The Suzuki Vitara offers two engine options, both featuring a 4-cylinder layout. The first is a petrol mild hybrid (MHEV) variant with a power output of 129 HP, while the full hybrid variant produces up to 116 HP. This engine setup allows the Vitara to achieve an acceleration of 0-100 km/h in as quick as 9.5 seconds and enables a top speed of 190 km/h. With a varied fuel consumption of 5.0 to 5.6 L/100km, it presents a balanced option for both performance and efficiency.
On the other hand, the Toyota Yaris Cross sports a 3-cylinder full hybrid engine, which provides a maximum output of 130 HP. It accelerates from 0-100 km/h in approximately 10.7 seconds. The Yaris Cross is praised for its fuel efficiency, showcasing consumption figures between 4.5 to 4.8 L/100km, which is commendable for an SUV.
The Vitara is available with both manual and automatic transmission options, offering flexibility for driving preferences. It also comes in both front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive configurations, appealing to various driving conditions and styles.
In contrast, the Yaris Cross is equipped solely with a continuously variable transmission (CVT) and front-wheel drive. While this limits some options, the CVT enhances the vehicle's efficiency and provides a smoother driving experience.
When it comes to dimensions, the Suzuki Vitara measures 4185 mm in length, 1775 mm in width, and 1595 mm in height. It has a trunk capacity of 375 liters, which is practical for carrying luggage or shopping. Additionally, its curb weight ranges between 1255 kg to 1395 kg depending on the configuration chosen.
The Toyota Yaris Cross is slightly shorter, at 4180 mm in length, and marginally narrower at 1765 mm. It surpasses the Vitara slightly in trunk capacity, offering 397 liters. The curb weight of the Yaris Cross is lighter, ranging from 1180 kg to 1290 kg, which can enhance driving dynamics and fuel efficiency.
Both the Vitara and Yaris Cross focus on delivering enhanced environmentally friendly features. The Suzuki Vitara offers CO2 efficiency classes ranging from C to D with emissions between 113 to 129 g/km. This reflects Suzuki's commitment to reducing environmental impact through sophisticated engineering and design.
In comparison, the Yaris Cross boasts lower emissions with a CO2 efficiency class of C, producing between 101 to 108 g/km. This aligns with Toyota's broader strategy toward sustainability and environmental consciousness, particularly through its hybrid technology.
When considering the overall package, buyers will also want to reflect on the price points for each vehicle. Typically, the Suzuki Vitara comes at a competitive price, reflecting its versatile features and performance abilities. The Toyota Yaris Cross, while often priced similarly, may deliver better long-term fuel savings due to its superior efficiency ratings.
In summary, both the Suzuki Vitara and Toyota Yaris Cross have distinct advantages that cater to varying consumer preferences. The Vitara stands out with its versatility in drivetrain options and slightly better performance metrics, whereas the Yaris Cross excels in fuel efficiency and a commitment to lower emissions.
Ultimately, the decision between these two remarkable SUVs will depend on individual priorities—be it performance, fuel efficiency, design, or environmental impact. Either way, drivers can expect reliability and comfort from both models as they navigate the roads ahead.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 23200 - 30400
£
|
Price
about 24200 - 33900
£
|
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.6
L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 4.8
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
113 - 129
g/km
|
co2
101 - 108
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
47
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
36
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1255 - 1395
kg
|
Curb weight
1180 - 1290
kg
|
Trunk capacity
289 - 375
L
|
Trunk capacity
320 - 397
L
|
Length
4185
mm
|
Length
4180
mm
|
Width
1775
mm
|
Width
1765
mm
|
Height
1595
mm
|
Height
1595
mm
|
Payload
375 - 395
kg
|
Payload
485 - 510
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automated Manual
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
116 - 129
HP
|
Power HP
116 - 130
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.5 - 12.7
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.7 - 11.3
s
|
Max Speed
180 - 190
km/h
|
Max Speed
170
km/h
|
Torque
235
Nm
|
Torque
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Power kW
85 - 95
kW
|
Power kW
85 - 96
kW
|
Engine capacity
1373 - 1462
cm3
|
Engine capacity
1490
cm3
|
Top speed
180 - 190
km/h
|
Top speed
170
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Brand
Toyota
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.