Compare performance (156 HP vs 225 HP), boot space and price (22,500 £ vs 34,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Avenger or Jeep Compass?
As the automotive market continues to evolve, Jeep has introduced two distinct models that cater to different preferences and driving needs: the Jeep Avenger and the Jeep Compass. Each SUV brings its unique strengths to the table, making them worthy contenders in the compact SUV segment. This article will explore the technical specifications and innovations of both vehicles, allowing potential buyers to make informed choices.
The Jeep Avenger offers a diversified engine lineup, featuring electric and petrol options. With an electric variant producing up to 156 HP and a torque of 260 Nm, the Avenger showcases impressive acceleration capabilities—achieving 0 to 100 km/h in just 9 seconds. Additionally, it offers a driving range of approximately 400 km on a full charge, thanks to its 51 kWh battery capacity. This model is designed for the eco-conscious driver while also delivering spirited performance.
On the other hand, the Jeep Compass is equipped with traditional petrol MHEV and plug-in hybrid engines, offering power outputs ranging from 130 HP to a robust 240 HP. With the highest performing variant reaching 0 to 100 km/h in just 7.3 seconds, the Compass exudes confidence on the road. It caters to a broader range of performance preferences while also offering an electric-only range of up to 36 km for local commuting.
When it comes to fuel efficiency, the Jeep Avenger’s electric motor provides a remarkable energy consumption rate of 15.4 kWh/100 km, contributing to its zero CO2 emissions in electric mode. The petrol options range from 5.4 to 5.7 L/100 km, placing it in a competitive position among small SUVs.
The Compass, however, is also efficient, particularly with its hybrid variants. Consumption figures average around 2 L/100 km for its PHEV model, making it an appealing choice for those looking to minimize their carbon footprint. Nonetheless, it does emit CO2, with figures reaching up to 124 g/km for petrol models.
In terms of physical dimensions, the Avenger is slightly smaller, measuring 4084 mm in length and 1776 mm in width. It offers a trunk capacity of 355 liters, which is sufficient for everyday use, though not class-leading.
In contrast, the Compass embodies a more substantial presence with a length of 4404 mm and a width of 1819 mm. It boasts a larger trunk capacity of 438 liters, providing additional space for gear and family outings. Clearly, for buyers needing more cargo room, the Compass could be the preferable option.
Both SUVs are equipped with contemporary technology and comfort features aimed at enhancing the driving experience. The Avenger leans towards modernity with its digital cockpit and advanced connectivity options, reflecting the latest industry trends aimed at younger, tech-savvy drivers.
The Compass, on the other hand, combines sophistication with practicality. Its interior is crafted with high-quality materials and features Jeep's renowned infotainment system, providing seamless navigation and entertainment. The availability of safety features and advanced driver-assistance systems in both models ensures that passengers are secure, enhancing overall confidence while driving.
As far as driving dynamics are concerned, the Jeep Avenger offers a nimble driving experience, aided by its lower curb weight of 1520 kg. This makes it particularly agile in urban environments, allowing for quick maneuvers when navigating tight spaces.
The Compass emphasizes passenger comfort and off-road capability. Although slightly heavier at 1575 kg, it is equipped with features that enhance its stability on various terrains, making it a versatile option for drivers who frequently venture off the beaten path.
Ultimately, choosing between the Jeep Avenger and the Jeep Compass boils down to individual preferences and requirements. The Avenger shines with its eco-friendly approach and electric options, appealing to environmentally conscious drivers. Conversely, the Compass boasts a broader range of powerful engines, a more spacious interior, and enhanced off-road performance, making it a solid choice for traditional SUV enthusiasts.
Both models carry the Jeep legacy forward while incorporating modern innovations, ensuring that buyers enjoy reliability, performance, and comfort. Deciding between these two options will surely be a rewarding experience for any Jeep enthusiast.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Jeep Avenger is considerably cheaper – starting at 22,500 £ , while the Jeep Compass costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,658 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jeep Compass uses 3 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Jeep Avenger with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 1.9 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Jeep Avenger is a bit more efficient: consuming 15.5 kWh/100km compared to 17.5 kWh/100km for the Jeep Compass. That’s a difference of about 2 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Jeep Compass offers somewhat more range – reaching up to 500 km, about 100 km more than the Jeep Avenger.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Jeep Compass offers clearly more power – delivering 225 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 69 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jeep Compass is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the Jeep Avenger takes 9 s. That’s about 1 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Jeep Avenger is barely faster – reaching 194 km/h, while the Jeep Compass tops out at 188 km/h. The difference is around 6 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Jeep Compass delivers visibly more torque with 345 Nm compared to 260 Nm. That’s about 85 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Jeep Avenger is considerably lighter – 1,180 kg compared to 1,667 kg. The difference is around 487 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Jeep Compass offers noticeably more boot space – 550 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 170 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Jeep Compass offers slightly more capacity – up to 1,561 L, about 284 L more than the Jeep Avenger.
The Jeep Compass is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Jeep Avenger shrinks Jeep's boxy, adventurous styling into a city-friendly electric crossover that looks just as at home on tight streets as it does on muddy weekend lanes. It's a savvy pick for drivers who want go-anywhere attitude without the truck-size ego — practical inside, lively around town and ready to tackle a bit of rough stuff when the mood strikes.
details
The Jeep Compass packs classic Jeep styling with a surprisingly composed demeanor, equally at home turning heads in the city or tackling a weekend dirt track. Inside it's a pragmatic, user-friendly compact SUV that prioritizes comfort and versatility — a smart pick if you want a dose of adventure without giving up everyday sense.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
22,500 - 36,900 £
|
Price
34,200 - 43,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
3 - 5.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
400 km
|
Electric Range
95 - 500 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
51 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
74 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 129 g/km
|
co2
0 - 130 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,180 - 1,520 kg
|
Curb weight
1,667 - 2,198 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
325 - 380 L
|
Trunk capacity
550 L
|
|
Length
4,084 - 4,088 mm
|
Length
4,552 mm
|
|
Width
1,776 mm
|
Width
1,928 mm
|
|
Height
1,527 - 1,541 mm
|
Height
1,675 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,218 - 1,277 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,561 L
|
|
Payload
494 - 502 kg
|
Payload
-
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
100 - 156 HP
|
Power HP
145 - 225 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 10.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
150 - 194 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 - 188 km/h
|
|
Torque
205 - 260 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
|
Power kW
107 - 165 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,596 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A, B
|
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España