Compare performance (156 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (22,500 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Avenger or Nissan Juke?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the ever-expanding realm of compact SUVs, two titans stand ready for comparison: the Jeep Avenger and the Nissan Juke. Both vehicles offer unique takes on the modern SUV experience, blending style, technology, and performance. Whether you're looking for innovation under the hood or comfort inside the cabin, this comparison will help you make an informed choice.
The Jeep Avenger leads with a diverse array of engine types, offering electric, petrol, and Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle (MHEV) options. Its electric motor boasts 156 HP, delivering a swift 0-100 km/h acceleration in just 9 seconds, proving to be not only powerful but also efficient with a consumption of 15.4 kWh/100km. Petrol variants provide a range of 100 to 136 HP, accommodating versatile drive preferences with both manual and automatic gearboxes. Notably, the Avenger's electric variant promises a remarkable 400 km range on a single charge.
The Nissan Juke, on the other hand, presents petrol and full-hybrid engine options. The full-hybrid model provides 143 HP with improved fuel efficiency, offering 4.7 L/100km. The Juke's performance is highlighted by a decent 0-100 km/h time of 10.1 seconds and a top speed of 180 km/h, making it a formidable contender in urban and suburban settings.
In terms of size, the Juke measures at a length of 4210 mm, a width of 1800 mm, and a height of 1593 mm. This provides a slightly more compact stature compared to the Avenger, which extends to 4084 mm in length, 1776 mm in width, and up to 1536 mm in height. Both models sport the common SUV body type with five doors, yet the Juke edges out with a slightly larger trunk capacity of 422 L compared to Avenger's 380 L.
Technological integration is where each model shines uniquely. The Jeep Avenger, especially in its newer models, has an edge in cutting-edge electric technology, providing a spacious and silent drive free from emissions. The electric variant stands out with its top-notch CO2 efficiency, rated at class A.
The Nissan Juke distinguishes itself with its advanced hybrid technology, merging petrol and electric power sources to enhance fuel efficiency and reduce carbon footprint. Its CO2 efficiency class spans D to C, showing an environmentally friendly approach to compact SUV design.
Ultimately, choosing between the Jeep Avenger and Nissan Juke depends largely on your priorities. The Jeep Avenger impresses with its robust engine options and extraordinary electric range, ideal for those ready to embrace the future of electrification. Meanwhile, the Nissan Juke appeals with its hybrid efficiency, compact size, and practical interior design, perfect for those prioritizing fuel economy and urban-friendly dynamics.
Both are impressive players in the SUV market, each offering distinct advantages tailored to different driving needs and preferences. Whether you opt for the adventurous spirit of the Jeep Avenger or the urban sophistication of the Nissan Juke, you can be assured of a thrilling ride.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Nissan Juke is only slightly cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Jeep Avenger costs 22,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,157 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Nissan Juke uses 4.7 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Jeep Avenger with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Jeep Avenger offers marginally more power – delivering 156 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 13 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jeep Avenger is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 9 s, while the Nissan Juke takes 10.1 s. That’s about 1.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Jeep Avenger delivers visibly more torque with 260 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 60 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Jeep Avenger is barely lighter – 1,180 kg compared to 1,274 kg. The difference is around 94 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Nissan Juke offers only slightly more boot space – 422 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 42 L.
When it comes to payload, the Jeep Avenger carries somewhat more – 502 kg compared to 427 kg. That’s a difference of about 75 kg.
The Jeep Avenger is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Jeep Avenger shrinks Jeep's boxy, adventurous styling into a city-friendly electric crossover that looks just as at home on tight streets as it does on muddy weekend lanes. It's a savvy pick for drivers who want go-anywhere attitude without the truck-size ego — practical inside, lively around town and ready to tackle a bit of rough stuff when the mood strikes.
details
The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
22,500 - 35,000 £
|
Price
21,400 - 31,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
400 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 129 g/km
|
co2
105 - 136 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,180 - 1,520 kg
|
Curb weight
1,274 - 1,405 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
355 - 380 L
|
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,776 mm
|
Width
1,800 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
494 - 502 kg
|
Payload
405 - 427 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
100 - 156 HP
|
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 10.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
205 - 260 Nm
|
Torque
200 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
|
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
|
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España