VS

Ford Puma vs Jeep Avenger comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 156 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 22,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Jeep Avenger?

Ford Puma vs Jeep Avenger: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly more power
  • moderately more efficient
  • barely more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly more trunk space
details

Jeep Avenger

4.1 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • moderately more efficient
  • slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Puma

Ford Puma vs Jeep Avenger — what this matchup is about

Ford Puma vs Jeep Avenger pits a playful, driver‑focused small SUV against a compact, comfort‑minded city Jeep with a rugged look. The Ford Puma leans into agility, tech and an unusually clever boot for the class, while the Jeep Avenger trades sporting ambition for easy parking, protective cladding and a softer ride. This comparison looks at how those different characters translate into daily life: who will enjoy longer trips, who will appreciate boot usability, and who will feel at home in the cabin. Read on for clear, buyer‑relevant contrasts that make the practical differences obvious before we dig into the specs.

Avenger

Character and driving feel

The Ford Puma feels like a small car that grew into an SUV: sharp steering, eager turn‑in and a generally engaging personality that rewards active drivers. The Jeep Avenger, by contrast, steers a calmer course — its setup is forgiving and confidence‑building in town, not sporty on sweeping country roads. If you enjoy threading through corners and want a car that feels lively on twisty routes, the Puma will put a smile on your face; if you prefer relaxed responses and predictable composure for everyday driving, the Avenger will feel less demanding. Both have modern drivetrains, but the Puma’s sportier setup comes with compromises (firmer ride, a gruff low‑rev thrum) that the Avenger largely avoids.

Puma

Comfort and long‑distance behavior

On long stretches the Ford Puma can be perfectly acceptable, with supportive front seats and a stable highway demeanor, yet it never quite masks its compact‑car origins and firmer suspension choices show on sharp potholes. The Jeep Avenger tends to be the gentler companion for longer stints thanks to a more cushioned ride and a front cabin that feels airy and less intimate. Noise and refinement trade places too: the Puma’s small‑engine rasp is noticeable at lower revs, while the Avenger can reveal wind noise at higher speeds depending on tyres and variant. If motorway miles dominate your usage, you’ll feel the difference — Puma is livelier but more fidgety, Avenger is softer but less composed in high‑speed scenarios.

Avenger

City friendliness and everyday practicality

Both cars are compact enough for tight streets, yet they help you in different ways: the Jeep Avenger excels at simple, confident parking and forward visibility, and its protective plastic cladding takes the sting out of urban scrapes. The Ford Puma wins on cargo cleverness — its wide boot opening and a practical washable compartment make loading bikes, muddy boots or pet carriers far less fiddly. Rear passenger space is tight in both, but the Puma’s trade is a more usable boot while the Avenger gives a more relaxed driving position up front and easier placement in narrow spots. Choose Avenger if you prioritise urban manoeuvrability and a tough exterior; choose Puma if weekend gear and trunk practicality matter more.

Puma

Cabin feel and perceived quality

The Puma’s interior reads as modern: large screens, connected software and a cleaner, tech‑led design, although many physical buttons have been removed and some materials feel basic at close inspection. The Avenger keeps things straightforward with physical climate controls and a tactile layout, but its interior leans on durable hard plastics that lower the premium feel. In short, the Ford Puma looks newer and smarter at a glance, while the Jeep Avenger feels functionally honest and built to live with bangs and scrapes. Buyers sensitive to touchscreen‑centric ergonomics will notice the Puma’s compromises, while those who like buttons and a rugged cabin will prefer the Avenger’s simplicity.

Avenger

Which buyer suits which car — final fit contrast

If you want a small SUV that drives with enthusiasm, carries awkward loads cleverly and showcases the latest infotainment, the Ford Puma is aimed squarely at you; it suits solo drivers, couples and active‑lifestyle owners who accept a snug back seat for sharp handling and smart trunk solutions. If your life is tighter streets, frequent short trips, a need for easy parking and a more forgiving ride, the Jeep Avenger fits better — especially for buyers who value simple controls, protective styling and a comfortable city cruiser. Neither choice is objectively superior; think about whether you prize sportiness and luggage ingenuity (Puma) or relaxed comfort and urban practicality (Avenger) before moving on to the technical comparison.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In one corner, the Ford Puma brings sporty flair and sharp handling to the small-SUV ring; in the other, the SEAT Arona sticks to sensible practicality and wallet-friendly charm. Which one wins your city commute, weekend escape and resale cheque comes down to whether you want fun on twisty roads or …
Jeep Avenger
Fiat Grande Panda
VS
Choosing between the Jeep Avenger and the Fiat Panda comes down to whether you prefer a compact, SUV‑styled EV with modern tech and a higher driving position or a no‑nonsense, city‑focused hatchback built for practicality and low running costs. The Avenger targets buyers wanting electric range and …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Jeep Avenger is marginally cheaper – starting at 22,500 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,372 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jeep Avenger uses 4.9 L/100km and is moderately more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.5 L/100km.

In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is moderately more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 15.5 kWh/100km for the Jeep Avenger. That’s a difference of about 2.5 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers barely more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 17 km more than the Jeep Avenger.

Avenger

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers very slightly more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 12 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Jeep Avenger takes 9 s. That’s about 1.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers moderately more torque with 290 Nm compared to 260 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Jeep Avenger is slightly lighter – 1,180 kg compared to 1,316 kg. The difference is around 136 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers visibly more boot space – 523 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 143 L.

When it comes to payload, the Jeep Avenger carries marginally more – 502 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 33 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma is clearly ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 404 - 417 km
details
Ford Puma
Jeep Avenger

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Jeep Avenger

The Jeep Avenger mixes rugged styling with a compact, city‑friendly footprint that makes it easy to maneuver while keeping Jeep’s adventurous character. Inside it offers a practical, modern cabin with sensible tech and comfort aimed at everyday driving and light weekend getaways.

details
2118838-03507ed1v0(1)
2118850-pp58p0pybj
2118871-xg718qsa6s(1)
2118877-sxxt0lqr4b(1)
2118868-dnxb2h5cci

Reviews Jeep Avenger

4.1 (9 Reviews)
rate
Marco
21 May 2026, 15:07:20

Practical car, zippy especially in the city, equipped with excellent technology, handles bumps and rough surfaces very well, super satisfied.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Mattia
5 May 2026, 13:45:25

The car itself is very nice and very comfortable; I've been using it for a year and a half now and I've never had mechanical or engine problems. Fuel consumption is very good for the class, considering it's almost an SUV and, in my case, a petrol-only car. It uses little fuel if you keep a relaxed pace; when you push it it obviously starts to drink more, but if used properly the consumption is optimal. The only flaw of this car is the electronics (ECU, displays, device updates): the car quite often has problems with the instrument cluster and the central display, which is very annoying given that electronics are now fundamental in cars, especially for city driving or short trips. Other than that no problems — I use the car mainly for work, and after a year and a half and 47,000 km I can say it's recommendable if the electronics issue doesn't bother you.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alejandro Montes
14 Apr 2026, 16:42:03

It's a tough decision, but definitely the Avenger — more technology and better fuel economy.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Angelo
1 Mar 2026, 09:36:45

The Jeep Avenger mild hybrid sports an attractive design. The engine and automatic gearbox are very smooth and capable. Driving is intuitive and pleasant with low urban fuel consumption and the ability to cover short low-speed stretches in electric-only mode despite being a mild hybrid.

Negatives: imperfect panel fit, software and graphical interface often unreliable and inconsistent, losing stored display settings. Narrow seat positioning and an interior with limited space relative to the car’s exterior dimensions. Condensation forming in the rear lights despite replacement under warranty.

Overall quality is modest and does not justify the price. Dashboard and door-panel plastics feel cheap and brittle. Overall quality is barely mediocre.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Mauro
19 Feb 2026, 10:57:10

Jeep is no longer the reliable brand it once was, and the Avenger shows the effects of poor overall quality. Cute, but uncomfortable (narrow seats... you hurt your hand trying to buckle the seatbelt!)

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Jeep Avenger
Jeep Compass
VS
The Jeep Avenger and Jeep Compass target different buyers: the Avenger is a small electric crossover focused on urban efficiency, while the Compass is a larger, more traditional compact SUV with broader engine and capability options. Choosing between them comes down to whether you prioritise …
Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
Jeep Avenger
Peugeot 2008
VS
Deciding between the Jeep Avenger and the Peugeot 2008 means choosing between two competent subcompact SUVs that balance city-friendly size with practical versatility. The Avenger leans into Jeep styling and a tougher image, especially with its electric option, while the 2008 emphasises refined …
Ford Puma
Kia EV2
VS
The Ford Puma and Kia EV2 represent two different approaches in the compact crossover class: the Puma delivers engaging handling, practical packaging and petrol/hybrid options, while the EV2 is a clean-sheet electric aimed at low running costs, range and modern tech. Choose the Puma if driving …
Jeep Avenger
Jeep Renegade
VS
The Jeep Avenger and Jeep Renegade both wear the Jeep badge but aim at different buyers: the Avenger is a newer, city-focused compact (with an electric option in many markets), while the Renegade is a bigger, more rugged small SUV with broader engine choices. This comparison highlights the key …
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
Ford Puma
Jeep Avenger

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
22,500 - 36,800 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
400 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
0 - 129 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,180 - 1,520 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
325 - 380 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,776 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
490 - 502 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
100 - 156 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 10.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
205 - 260 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, A, D
Brand
Ford
Brand
Jeep
What drivetrain options does the Ford Puma have?

The Ford Puma is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.