Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Jeep Avenger comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 156 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 22,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Jeep Avenger?
Ford Puma vs Jeep Avenger: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Jeep Avenger is marginally cheaper – starting at 22,500 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,372 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jeep Avenger uses 4.9 L/100km and is moderately more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.5 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is moderately more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 15.5 kWh/100km for the Jeep Avenger. That’s a difference of about 2.5 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers barely more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 17 km more than the Jeep Avenger.
Avenger
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers very slightly more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 12 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Jeep Avenger takes 9 s. That’s about 1.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers moderately more torque with 290 Nm compared to 260 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Jeep Avenger is slightly lighter – 1,180 kg compared to 1,316 kg. The difference is around 136 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Jeep Avenger carries marginally more – 502 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 33 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma is narrowly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
Jeep Avenger
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Jeep Avenger
The Jeep Avenger shrinks Jeep's boxy, adventurous styling into a city-friendly electric crossover that looks just as at home on tight streets as it does on muddy weekend lanes. It's a savvy pick for drivers who want go-anywhere attitude without the truck-size ego — practical inside, lively around town and ready to tackle a bit of rough stuff when the mood strikes.
details
Ford Puma
Jeep Avenger
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
22,500 - 36,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
400 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
51 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 - 129 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,180 - 1,520 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
325 - 380 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,084 - 4,088 mm
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,776 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,527 - 1,541 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,218 - 1,277 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
494 - 502 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
100 - 156 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 10.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
150 - 194 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
205 - 260 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Jeep
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.