Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Jeep Avenger comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 156 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 22500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Jeep Avenger?
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Jeep Avenger has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 22500 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2229 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Jeep Avenger manages with 4.90 L and is therefore to a small extent more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.50 L per 100 km.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13 kWh per 100 km, it’s to a small extent more efficient than the Jeep Avenger with 15.50 kWh. That’s a difference of about 2.50 kWh.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma performs slight better – achieving up to 417 km, about 17 km more than the Jeep Avenger.
Avenger
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a slight edge – offering 168 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 12 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Jeep Avenger takes 9 s. That’s about 1.60 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs slight better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Jeep Avenger tops out at 194 km/h. The difference is around 16 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls slightly stronger with 290 Nm compared to 260 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm difference.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Jeep Avenger is slightly lighter – 1180 kg compared to 1316 kg. The difference is around 136 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers a bit more room – 456 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 76 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Jeep Avenger performs slight better – up to 1277 L, which is about 61 L more than the Ford Puma.
When it comes to payload, Jeep Avenger barely noticeable takes the win – 502 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 33 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma has the upper hand in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Ford Puma
Jeep Avenger
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £24,800
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
2.9 (10 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Jeep Avenger
4.2 (4 Reviews)
The Jeep Avenger shrinks Jeep's boxy, adventurous styling into a city-friendly electric crossover that looks just as at home on tight streets as it does on muddy weekend lanes. It's a savvy pick for drivers who want go-anywhere attitude without the truck-size ego — practical inside, lively around town and ready to tackle a bit of rough stuff when the mood strikes.
details
Ford Puma
Jeep Avenger
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
22500 - 36900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.50 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
400 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
51 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 - 129 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1180 - 1520 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 L
|
Trunk capacity
325 - 380 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4084 - 4088 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1776 mm
|
|
Height
1550 mm
|
Height
1527 - 1541 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1218 - 1277 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
494 - 502 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
100 - 156 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 10.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
190 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
150 - 194 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
205 - 260 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025 - 2026
|
Model Year
2023 - 2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.