In the battle of compact crossovers, the Ford Puma showcases a sporty design and dynamic handling, appealing to those who crave a fun driving experience. Meanwhile, the VW T-Cross emphasizes practicality and interior space, making it a top choice for families seeking comfort on the road. Both vehicles offer impressive tech features, but their differing approaches to style and functionality make this comparison a compelling one for potential buyers.
In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the Ford Puma and VW T-Cross emerge as two well-rounded contenders that offer a blend of style, performance, and practicality. As they field for your attention in 2024, let’s delve deeper into their technical aspects and innovations to see how they stack up against one another.
Starting with the Ford Puma, this model comes equipped with a range of petrol hybrid engines, offering outputs from 125 to 160 HP. The power delivery is smooth, and the Puma confidently accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 7.4 seconds for the more powerful variants. With a front-wheel drive layout, drivers can choose between a manual gearbox or a DCT automatic transmission, providing both engagement and convenience.
On the other hand, the VW T-Cross presents a more traditional lineup of petrol engines, with power outputs ranging from 95 to 150 HP. The acceleration times peak at 8.4 seconds for the sportier variants, showcasing commendable performance for a compact SUV. Like the Puma, the T-Cross offers both manual and automatic transmission options, but it notably includes a larger engine capacity of up to 1498 cc in some models.
When evaluating fuel efficiency, the Ford Puma impresses with consumption figures ranging from 5.4 to 6 L/100 km, while CO2 emissions hover around 121 to 136 g/km. This efficiency is partly attributed to its innovative mild-hybrid technology, which enhances fuel economy without sacrificing performance.
The VW T-Cross, while slightly less efficient, boasts competitive figures of 5.6 to 6 L/100 km and CO2 emissions from 127 to 135 g/km. Though it lacks hybrid technology, the T-Cross employs lightweight design elements and effective engine optimization to maintain decent fuel economy.
In terms of dimensions, the Ford Puma spans between 4186 and 4226 mm in length, 1805 mm in width, and 1550 mm in height, providing ample space for passengers and cargo. The trunk capacity is commendably 456 L, allowing for practical day-to-day usability.
The VW T-Cross is compact at 4127 mm long and 1784 mm wide, but it offers a generous trunk capacity of 455 L as well. Despite its slightly smaller footprint, the T-Cross provides a well-designed interior with ample headroom thanks to its height of 1573 mm, ensuring comfort for all five occupants.
Modern safety features are paramount in today’s vehicles, and both the Ford Puma and VW T-Cross deliver in this category. The Puma is equipped with Ford’s latest Co-Pilot360 suite, which includes advanced driver assistance features such as adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assistance, and automated emergency braking. Its robust safety ratings make it a reliable family car.
The T-Cross, a model known for its safety, includes VW’s IQ.DRIVE technology, enhancing safety with features like travel assist, lane assist, and adaptive cruise control. It boasts a suite of airbags and solid crash-test performances, increasing its appeal to safety-conscious buyers.
Choosing between the Ford Puma and the VW T-Cross ultimately boils down to personal preference. The Puma excels with its refreshing hybrid technology and sporty driving dynamics, making it an extremely attractive option for those seeking performance and efficiency combined.
Conversely, the T-Cross boosts its offering with traditional petrol engines and a slightly more spacious interior, which can appeal to families looking for reliability and spacious comfort. Both vehicles are deserving picks in the competitive compact SUV segment, and it comes down to whether you want the modern flair of hybrid technology or the established charm of VW craftsmanship.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 24800 - 34800
£
|
Price
about 20900 - 31300
£
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6
L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 6
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.7
kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
364 - 376
km
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
43
kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
121, 129, 128, 136, 0
g/km
|
co2
127 - 135
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
42
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
40
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563
kg
|
Curb weight
1254 - 1326
kg
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523
L
|
Trunk capacity
455
L
|
Length
4186 - 4226
mm
|
Length
4127
mm
|
Width
1805
mm
|
Width
1784
mm
|
Height
1550 - 1555
mm
|
Height
1573
mm
|
Payload
367 - 469
kg
|
Payload
474 - 480
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
125 - 168
HP
|
Power HP
95 - 150
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.2
s
|
Max Speed
160 - 210
km/h
|
Max Speed
180 - 200
km/h
|
Torque
170 - 290
Nm
|
Torque
175 - 250
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Power kW
92 - 124
kW
|
Power kW
70 - 110
kW
|
Engine capacity
999
cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1498
cm3
|
Top speed
160 - 210
km/h
|
Top speed
180 - 200
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
VW
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.