Compare performance (168 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 21400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or VW T-Cross?
In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the Ford Puma and VW T-Cross emerge as two well-rounded contenders that offer a blend of style, performance, and practicality. As they field for your attention in 2024, let’s delve deeper into their technical aspects and innovations to see how they stack up against one another.
Starting with the Ford Puma, this model comes equipped with a range of petrol hybrid engines, offering outputs from 125 to 160 HP. The power delivery is smooth, and the Puma confidently accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 7.4 seconds for the more powerful variants. With a front-wheel drive layout, drivers can choose between a manual gearbox or a DCT automatic transmission, providing both engagement and convenience.
On the other hand, the VW T-Cross presents a more traditional lineup of petrol engines, with power outputs ranging from 95 to 150 HP. The acceleration times peak at 8.4 seconds for the sportier variants, showcasing commendable performance for a compact SUV. Like the Puma, the T-Cross offers both manual and automatic transmission options, but it notably includes a larger engine capacity of up to 1498 cc in some models.
When evaluating fuel efficiency, the Ford Puma impresses with consumption figures ranging from 5.4 to 6 L/100 km, while CO2 emissions hover around 121 to 136 g/km. This efficiency is partly attributed to its innovative mild-hybrid technology, which enhances fuel economy without sacrificing performance.
The VW T-Cross, while slightly less efficient, boasts competitive figures of 5.6 to 6 L/100 km and CO2 emissions from 127 to 135 g/km. Though it lacks hybrid technology, the T-Cross employs lightweight design elements and effective engine optimization to maintain decent fuel economy.
In terms of dimensions, the Ford Puma spans between 4186 and 4226 mm in length, 1805 mm in width, and 1550 mm in height, providing ample space for passengers and cargo. The trunk capacity is commendably 456 L, allowing for practical day-to-day usability.
The VW T-Cross is compact at 4127 mm long and 1784 mm wide, but it offers a generous trunk capacity of 455 L as well. Despite its slightly smaller footprint, the T-Cross provides a well-designed interior with ample headroom thanks to its height of 1573 mm, ensuring comfort for all five occupants.
Modern safety features are paramount in today’s vehicles, and both the Ford Puma and VW T-Cross deliver in this category. The Puma is equipped with Ford’s latest Co-Pilot360 suite, which includes advanced driver assistance features such as adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assistance, and automated emergency braking. Its robust safety ratings make it a reliable family car.
The T-Cross, a model known for its safety, includes VW’s IQ.DRIVE technology, enhancing safety with features like travel assist, lane assist, and adaptive cruise control. It boasts a suite of airbags and solid crash-test performances, increasing its appeal to safety-conscious buyers.
Choosing between the Ford Puma and the VW T-Cross ultimately boils down to personal preference. The Puma excels with its refreshing hybrid technology and sporty driving dynamics, making it an extremely attractive option for those seeking performance and efficiency combined.
Conversely, the T-Cross boosts its offering with traditional petrol engines and a slightly more spacious interior, which can appeal to families looking for reliability and spacious comfort. Both vehicles are deserving picks in the competitive compact SUV segment, and it comes down to whether you want the modern flair of hybrid technology or the established charm of VW craftsmanship.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
VW T-Cross has a to a small extent advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21400 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3377 £.
Both cars consume an average of 5.40 L per 100 km – no difference here.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a somewhat edge – offering 168 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the VW T-Cross takes 8.40 s. That’s about 1 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls a bit stronger with 290 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm difference.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, VW T-Cross is slight lighter – 1267 kg compared to 1316 kg. The difference is around 49 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers slightly more room – 523 L compared to 455 L. That’s a difference of about 68 L.
When it comes to payload, VW T-Cross hardly perceptible takes the win – 480 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 11 kg.
The Ford Puma is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
The VW T-Cross turns everyday practicality into a style statement, offering a roomy-feeling cabin, clever storage and playful design that suits town life and family duties alike. On the road it's composed and relaxed, rewarding buyers who want the raised seating and confident presence of an SUV without the weighty compromises.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
21400 - 32000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
124 - 136 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1267 - 1338 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
455 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1784 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
463 - 480 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
VW
|
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España