VS

Ford Puma vs VW T-Cross - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (168 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 21400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or VW T-Cross?

Ford Puma

2 (7 Reviews)
rate

VW T-Cross

4 (1 Reviews)
rate

You can find all user reviews further down on this page.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

VW T-Cross has a to a small extent advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21400 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3377 £.

Both cars consume an average of 5.40 L per 100 km – no difference here.

T-Cross

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a somewhat edge – offering 168 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the VW T-Cross takes 8.40 s. That’s about 1 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls a bit stronger with 290 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm difference.

Ad · Affiliate
Car accessories
Car accessories
Popular best-sellers for everyday use & care
View on Amazon →
Boot organiser
Boot organiser
Storage boxes, nets & anti-slip solutions
Open best-sellers →
Car dash cams
Car dash cams
Safety, parking mode & 4K recording
See top models →
Car phone holders
Car phone holders
MagSafe, vent mounts & dashboard mounts
Browse popular mounts →
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, VW T-Cross is slight lighter – 1267 kg compared to 1316 kg. The difference is around 49 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers slightly more room – 523 L compared to 455 L. That’s a difference of about 68 L.

When it comes to payload, VW T-Cross hardly perceptible takes the win – 480 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 11 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Ford Puma proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Ford Puma is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £24,800
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 5.9 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13.1 - 13.9 kWh
  • Electric Range : 361 - 376 km
details
Ford Puma
VW T-Cross

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

2 (7 Reviews)
rate

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

VW T-Cross

4 (1 Reviews)
rate

The VW T-Cross turns everyday practicality into a style statement, offering a roomy-feeling cabin, clever storage and playful design that suits town life and family duties alike. On the road it's composed and relaxed, rewarding buyers who want the raised seating and confident presence of an SUV without the weighty compromises.

details
DB2021AU01108_medium
DB2021AU01109_medium
DB2021AU01111_medium
DB2021AU01114_medium
DB2021AU01120_medium
DB2021AU01124_medium

Reviews Ford Puma

2 (7 Reviews)
rate
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Reviews VW T-Cross

4 (1 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

Toyota Yaris Cross
VW T-Cross
VS
In the competitively growing subcompact SUV segment, the Toyota Yaris Cross and VW T-Cross stand out for their distinct offerings. The Yaris Cross boasts impressive hybrid efficiency and a rugged design, catering to environmentally conscious buyers seeking adventure. Meanwhile, the T-Cross excels …
Ford Focus
Ford Puma
VS
In the realm of compact vehicles, the Ford Focus and Ford Puma present two compelling choices, each with its own unique appeal. The Focus is celebrated for its spacious interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it an ideal option for families and enthusiasts alike. On the other hand, the Puma …
Ford Puma
VW T-Cross

Costs and Consumption
Price
24800 - 36300 £
Price
21400 - 32000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
124 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Curb weight
1267 - 1338 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
455 L
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Length
-
Width
1805 mm
Width
1784 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
463 - 480 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.3 s
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Ford
Brand
VW

Similar Comparisons

Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 …
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Cross
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Skoda Kamiq and VW T-Cross stand out with their distinctive styles and practicality. While both models share the same platform, the Kamiq offers a slightly more spacious interior, making it an excellent choice for families. On the other hand, the …
Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
Ford Puma
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the competitive arena of compact SUVs, the Ford Puma and Nissan Qashqai offer distinct advantages. The Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and lively handling, making it an exciting choice for city driving. Meanwhile, the Nissan Qashqai provides a versatile and spacious ride, equipped …
Ford Puma
Opel Mokka
VS
In the competitive segment of subcompact SUVs, the Ford Puma and Opel Mokka stand out with their distinctive styles and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty design and flexible interior, offering practicality without compromising on aesthetics, while the Mokka captivates …
SEAT Arona
VW T-Cross
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the SEAT Arona and VW T-Cross offer distinct personalities while sharing a similar platform. The Arona embodies a sporty spirit with its dynamic styling and vibrant color options, appealing to a younger audience, while the T-Cross emphasizes practicality …
VW Polo
VW T-Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the VW Polo and the VW T-Cross cater to different driving needs while maintaining Volkswagen's signature quality. The Polo, a beloved supermini, offers a sleek and nimble ride ideal for urban environments, boasting efficiency and precision handling. On the other hand, …
VW T-Cross
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the VW T-Cross and VW T-Roc showcase distinct personalities, catering to different preferences. The T-Cross excels in urban agility and practical, family-friendly features, while the T-Roc leans towards a sportier design and a more engaging driving experience. Both …
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.