@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
VS

Ford Puma vs Nissan Qashqai – Which model is better for everyday use?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Ford Puma or Nissan Qashqai fits your lifestyle better.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

The Compact SUV Showdown: Ford Puma Versus Nissan Qashqai

In the fiercely competitive compact SUV segment, the Ford Puma and Nissan Qashqai have made significant strides with their latest models for 2024 and 2025. Both vehicles promise to deliver innovative features, efficient powertrains, and practical design, but how do they stack up against each other? Let's dive into the technical details and innovations of these two stalwarts of the compact SUV world.

Qashqai @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Powertrain and Performance

At the heart of the Ford Puma is a versatile engine lineup. With petrol mild hybrid options delivering anywhere between 125 to 168 horsepower, the Puma is tailored for those who value a balance between performance and efficiency. Its electric variant provides an impressive range of up to 376 kilometers, extending its appeal to eco-conscious drivers.

On the other hand, the Nissan Qashqai offers a mix of petrol mild hybrid and full hybrid powertrains. Its horsepower range goes from 140 to 190, with a focus on everyday usability. The Qashqai also steps up with the option of front-wheel and all-wheel drive, providing added flexibility for varying driving conditions.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Transmission and Driving Dynamics

The Puma and Qashqai come with a choice of manual and automatic transmissions, with the Puma opting for a dual-clutch automatic while the Qashqai includes a CVT option. Both vehicles are equipped with front-wheel drive as standard, but the Qashqai edges out with available all-wheel drive, giving it a slight advantage for those seeking additional traction.

Qashqai @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Efficiency and Eco-Friendliness

Efficiency is a strong suit for the Ford Puma, with petrol consumption as low as 5.4 L/100 km, while its electric variant consumes between 13.1 to 13.7 kWh/100 km. The Puma also scores high on the eco-scale with a ‘CO2 Efficiency Class' rating spanning from A to E, showcasing its environmental credentials.

Nissan’s Qashqai isn't far behind, offering a fuel consumption range from 5.1 to 6.8 L/100 km. Although it presents slightly higher CO2 emissions, it compensates with advanced hybrid technology aimed at reducing overall environmental impact.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Design and Practicality

Both the Puma and Qashqai sport an SUV body type with five doors and five seats, providing ample space for occupants. The Puma's compact dimensions, with a length up to 4,226 mm and height of 1,555 mm, result in a nimble urban cruiser. Meanwhile, the Qashqai stretches slightly longer at 4,425 mm and stands taller at 1,625 mm, offering a more commanding road presence.

In terms of cargo space, the Puma provides between 456 to 523 liters, adept for everyday needs and small families. Conversely, the Qashqai offers a generous trunk capacity from 479 to 504 liters, making it ideal for those who prioritize luggage space.

Qashqai @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Safety and Innovation

Both SUVs are equipped with modern safety technologies. The Puma and Qashqai feature advanced driver-assistance systems designed to enhance safety and driving ease. Each brand continues to innovate, providing customers with a comprehensive suite of safety features.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Final Verdict

The choice between the Ford Puma and Nissan Qashqai comes down to individual needs and preferences. If you're in the market for an agile urban SUV with electric capabilities, the Puma presents a compelling option. However, if versatility and additional space are paramount, the Qashqai could be the better choice thanks to its hybrid models and optional all-wheel drive. Both models continue to set benchmarks in the compact SUV segment, ensuring customers have exceptional choices tailored to their lifestyles.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Qashqai @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Ford Puma has a to a small extent advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the Nissan Qashqai costs 29600 £. That’s a price difference of around 4834 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Nissan Qashqai manages with 4.50 L and is therefore clearly perceptible more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.90 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Qashqai has a slightly edge – offering 205 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 37 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Nissan Qashqai takes 7.60 s. That’s about 0.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs barely noticeable better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Nissan Qashqai tops out at 206 km/h. The difference is around 4 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Nissan Qashqai pulls a bit stronger with 330 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Puma is slight lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1420 kg. The difference is around 104 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers barely noticeable more room – 523 L compared to 504 L. That’s a difference of about 19 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Nissan Qashqai performs to a small extent better – up to 1447 L, which is about 164 L more than the Ford Puma.

When it comes to payload, Nissan Qashqai minimal takes the win – 520 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 51 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Nissan Qashqai proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Nissan Qashqai is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £29,600
Qashqai @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Nissan Qashqai

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 205 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.5 - 6.8 L
details

Ford Puma

5 (1)
rate

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Nissan Qashqai

The Nissan Qashqai blends practical, family-friendly packaging with SUV styling that refuses to shout, making it a sensible and dependable choice for everyday life. It’s comfortable to live with, economical on the road, and neatly equipped enough to feel modern without ever feeling precious — perfect if you want crossover versatility without the drama.

details
Nissan_Qashqai_4X4_005 @ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan_Qashqai_4X4_001 @ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan_Qashqai_4X4_011 @ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan_Qashqai_4X4_032 @ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan_Qashqai_4X4_022 @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Top Car Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …
Ford Puma
Nissan Qashqai
Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Qashqai @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption
Price
24800 - 36300 £
Price
29600 - 39900 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6.8 L
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
102 - 154 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
Fuel tank capacity
55 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Curb weight
1420 - 1665 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Length
4425 mm
Width
1805 mm
Width
1835 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Height
1625 mm
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Max trunk capacity
1422 - 1447 L
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
466 - 520 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
140 - 205 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 10.2 s
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
170 - 206 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
240 - 330 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
103 - 151 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1332 - 1498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
Brand
Ford
Brand
Nissan

Similar Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
MG MG4
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered compact crossover that feels taut and practical — with Ford's lively chassis, a roomy MegaBox boot and mild‑hybrid frugality — the Puma is the small SUV to live with. But if you're ready to go electric without blowing the budget, the MG4 serves up surprising …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Renault Group Media
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma and the Renault 5 both offer unique appeals in the compact car segment. The Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and dynamic driving experience, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a blend of style and performance. In contrast, the Renault 5 charms with its iconic …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Frontera
VS
The Ford Puma feels like a sprightly urban fox — compact, efficient and packed with modern tech, perfect if you want lively handling and low running costs for daily driving. The Opel Frontera is all rugged charm and chunky presence, built for dirt tracks and weekend hauls rather than tight city …
@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
MG ZS
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the MG ZS and Nissan Qashqai stand out with their unique offerings and charm. The MG ZS delivers remarkable value with its robust features and spacious interior, appealing to budget-conscious buyers, while the Nissan Qashqai impresses with its refined driving …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Focus
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
VS
In the realm of compact vehicles, the Ford Focus and Ford Puma present two compelling choices, each with its own unique appeal. The Focus is celebrated for its spacious interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it an ideal option for families and enthusiasts alike. On the other hand, the Puma …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Golf
VS
In the competitive arena of compact cars, the Ford Puma and VW Golf stand out for their exceptional blend of style and performance. The Puma impresses with its sporty design and agile handling, while the Golf continues to be a benchmark for interior quality and tech features. Ultimately, choosing …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
BYD Dolphin Surf
VS
The Ford Puma and the BYD Dolphin went head-to-head in a thrilling comparison, showcasing unique strengths for diverse drivers. The Ford Puma offers a smooth blend of performance and style with its more traditional compact SUV design, appealing to those who value a sporty driving experience. …
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.