VS

Ford Puma vs Nissan Qashqai comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 205 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 29,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Nissan Qashqai?

Ford Puma vs Nissan Qashqai: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally lighter
  • barely more trunk space
details

Nissan Qashqai

4.9 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit more power
  • markedly more efficient
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Puma

Ford Puma VS Nissan Qashqai — quick take

Ford Puma and Nissan Qashqai sit in the same compact‑SUV ring but aim at different buyers: the Puma courts the engaged driver who still needs everyday practicality, the Qashqai trades sparkle for calm, comfort and tech convenience. The Puma feels smaller and livelier the moment you steer it, while the Qashqai prioritises a relaxed, EV‑like delivery that soothes city and commuter miles. Both bring modern infotainment, but they present it differently — a touchscreen‑first cockpit in the Puma versus Google Built‑in with physical controls in the Qashqai. Read on to see which trade‑offs matter for your routine and family life before diving into the spec sheet below.

Qashqai

Character and driving experience

The Ford Puma is the sportier of the two: sharp turn‑in, buzzy feedback and a chassis that invites dynamic driving through twisty roads. The Nissan Qashqai is notably more restrained — steering and suspension tuned for reassurance rather than thrills — which makes it easier to live with on long commutes or with passengers who prefer calm. That difference is not academic: Puma owners tend to enjoy driving for its own sake, while Qashqai owners value serenity and predictability. If you want involvement and agility, Puma leans that way; if you want placid, predictable progress, Qashqai will feel more at home.

Puma

Comfort and long‑distance behavior

Nissan Qashqai makes long drives feel less tiring thanks to a smoother, quieter delivery and seats tuned for sustained comfort, especially on smaller wheels where road roar stays low. The Ford Puma front seats are supportive and suited to spirited driving, but the three‑cylinder tune and firmer springs can make lengthy motorway miles a touch louder and more tiring for some. Rear‑seat comfort is another split: Qashqai gives more usable space for adults and child seats, whereas Puma’s back bench is tighter and better for shorter trips or kids. Choose Qashqai for relaxed touring and Puma if you prioritise front‑seat ergonomics and cornering support.

Qashqai

Practicality and everyday usability

Practical differences show up in how you load and live with the cars: the Ford Puma’s clever boot layout and washable underfloor storage make awkward loads, muddy gear and sports kit far less of a hassle in a compact footprint. The Nissan Qashqai offsets that with wider doors, easier rear access and a more conventional load floor that suits families fitting child seats and heavy suitcases. In town, Puma’s smaller dimensions and playful steering make parking and lane‑changes simpler, whereas Qashqai’s 360° camera and visibility advantages reduce stress in tight urban manoeuvres. Both work for everyday life, but Puma favours clever cargo solutions and agility while Qashqai favours straightforward family usability.

Puma

Cabin tech and perceived quality

The two cabins take different routes to modernity: Puma leans into large displays and a slick digital presentation that looks contemporary but sacrifices some physical controls, meaning climate and basic functions often live in menus. Qashqai blends a modern Google‑centric system with familiar tactile buttons for core controls, which keeps the interface efficient and less distracting while driving. Material feel is another contrast — Puma feels younger and more playful but shows harder plastics in places, whereas Qashqai’s surfaces and trim come across as more cohesive and quietly mature. If you prefer cutting‑edge screens and don’t mind touch control, Puma impresses; if you want tidy ergonomics and reassuring tactile controls, Qashqai wins the day.

Qashqai

Which buyer suits each car?

Pick the Ford Puma if your priority is driver engagement, urban agility and a cleverly packaged boot that handles active lifestyles without demanding a large footprint. Choose the Nissan Qashqai if you want a calmer, more comfortable family daily driver with strong tech integration, better rear‑seat usability and an EV‑like feel for city traffic. Both have their compromises — Puma sacrifices some rear space and physical controls for dynamism and quirky storage, Qashqai trades lively handling for tranquillity and slightly higher packaging complexity — and the specs below will clarify where performance, economy and size concretely diverge. Match those trade‑offs to your weekly routine and the technical comparison will show which details tip the scale for you.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In one corner, the Ford Puma brings sporty flair and sharp handling to the small-SUV ring; in the other, the SEAT Arona sticks to sensible practicality and wallet-friendly charm. Which one wins your city commute, weekend escape and resale cheque comes down to whether you want fun on twisty roads or …
Nissan Qashqai
VW T-Roc
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, family-friendly compact SUV — roomy, quietly comfortable and packed with practical tech for long motorway miles. The VW T-Roc swaps a little rear-seat space for cheeky styling and sharper handling, so if you want personality and a bit more driver engagement it’s …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Ford Puma is markedly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Nissan Qashqai costs 29,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,691 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Nissan Qashqai uses 4.3 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 1.1 L/100km.

Qashqai

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Qashqai offers a bit more power – delivering 205 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 37 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Nissan Qashqai takes 7.6 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Qashqai delivers moderately more torque with 330 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is marginally lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,420 kg. The difference is around 104 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers barely more boot space – 523 L compared to 504 L. That’s a difference of about 19 L.

When it comes to payload, the Nissan Qashqai carries very slightly more – 516 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 47 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Nissan Qashqai is narrowly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £29,600
Qashqai

Nissan Qashqai

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 158 - 205 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.3 - 6.8 L/100km
details
Ford Puma
Nissan Qashqai

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Nissan Qashqai

The Nissan Qashqai is a compact crossover that blends everyday practicality with a comfortable, composed driving experience and a smart, well finished interior. It feels sensible and versatile for city life and longer trips, appealing to buyers who want a reliable, low fuss family car.

details
13. New refreshed Qashqai 2024 in fuji sunset color driving on the road in Faro, Portugal
3. New refreshed Qashqai 2024 in fuji sunset color driving on the road in Faro, Portugal
9-High
All-New Nissan Qashqai - Interior 32

Reviews Nissan Qashqai

4.9 (4 Reviews)
rate
karol
3 Jun 2026, 20:17:58

Great car — it has everything you need. Others are still learning, e.g. folding mirrors, a double trunk, and it's well soundproofed.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Qashqai
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …
Nissan Qashqai
Renault Captur
VS
The Nissan Qashqai stays the sensible family favourite — roomier, better built and more composed on the motorway, so it’s the pick if you value comfort and practicality without drama. The Renault Captur, meanwhile, charms with bolder styling, clever packaging and nippier city manners (usually for …
Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
MG ZS
Nissan Qashqai
VS
Cheap and cheerful, the MG ZS punches above its price with a roomy, gadget-heavy cabin and surprisingly sprightly electric options, while the Nissan Qashqai feels more grown-up — quieter, better driven and tougher to fault on long motorway runs. Pick the ZS if you want maximum kit for your money; …
BYD Seal U
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The BYD Seal U storms in as a slick, electric fastback that outpoints the Qashqai on pace, tech and running costs, while the Nissan Qashqai stays sensible with higher ride height, roomy practicality and a pedigree for reliability. If you crave EV performance and futuristic cabin kit — and can live …
Nissan Qashqai
Opel Grandland
VS
The Nissan Qashqai feels sharper on the road with refined handling and clever packaging, while the Opel Grandland answers with a roomier cabin and bolder looks that’ll please practical families. Pick the Qashqai for polished tech and a composed daily drive, choose the Grandland if you want more …
Nissan Qashqai
Renault Symbioz
VS
Comparing the Nissan Qashqai with the Renault Symbioz highlights a clash between a proven compact crossover and Renault's forward-looking Symbioz concept that showcases the brand's electric and connected ambitions. This comparison will focus on how they differ in design, practicality and technology …
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
Ford Puma
Nissan Qashqai

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
29,600 - 39,900 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
98 - 152 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,420 - 1,624 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,835 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
446 - 516 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
158 - 205 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 9.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
260 - 330 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
116 - 151 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
Brand
Ford
Brand
Nissan
What drivetrain options does the Ford Puma have?

The Ford Puma is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.