Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Nissan Qashqai - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (168 HP vs 205 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 29600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Nissan Qashqai?
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Puma has a to a small extent advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £ , while the Nissan Qashqai costs 29600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4834 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Nissan Qashqai manages with 4.50 L and is therefore clearly perceptible more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.90 L per 100 km.
Qashqai
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Qashqai has a slightly edge – offering 205 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 37 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Nissan Qashqai takes 7.60 s. That’s about 0.20 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs barely noticeable better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Nissan Qashqai tops out at 206 km/h. The difference is around 4 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Nissan Qashqai pulls a bit stronger with 330 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is slight lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1420 kg. The difference is around 104 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers barely noticeable more room – 523 L compared to 504 L. That’s a difference of about 19 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Nissan Qashqai performs to a small extent better – up to 1447 L, which is about 164 L more than the Ford Puma.
When it comes to payload, Nissan Qashqai minimal takes the win – 520 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 51 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Nissan Qashqai is slightly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Ford Puma
Nissan Qashqai
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £29,600
Nissan Qashqai
Ford Puma
2 (7 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Nissan Qashqai
5 (1 Reviews)
The Nissan Qashqai blends practical, family-friendly packaging with SUV styling that refuses to shout, making it a sensible and dependable choice for everyday life. It’s comfortable to live with, economical on the road, and neatly equipped enough to feel modern without ever feeling precious — perfect if you want crossover versatility without the drama.
details
Ford Puma
Nissan Qashqai
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
29600 - 39900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
102 - 154 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1420 - 1665 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4425 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1835 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1625 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1422 - 1447 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
466 - 520 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 205 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 10.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
170 - 206 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
240 - 330 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 151 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1332 - 1498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.