Compare performance (186 HP vs 205 HP), boot space and price (25200 £ vs 29600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Nissan Qashqai?
In the ever-growing segment of compact SUVs, two names often stand out: the Mazda CX-30 and the Nissan Qashqai. Both vying for the same space in our driveways, these vehicles offer distinct features and innovations that cater to the modern driver. This article delves into their technicalities, to help you make an informed decision on which SUV might better fit your lifestyle.
The Mazda CX-30 offers a choice between a petrol mild hybrid system paired with either a manual or automatic gearbox. With power options of 186 HP and 140 HP, the CX-30 accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in a time range of 8.3 to 10.3 seconds, reaching a maximum speed between 191 and 204 km/h. The engine capacity varies from 1998 to 2488 cm3, providing torque of up to 240 Nm.
Meanwhile, the Nissan Qashqai offers both petrol mild hybrid and full hybrid options. Engine power varies from 140 HP up to 190 HP. The Qashqai’s acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h ranges from 7.9 to 10.2 seconds, with a top speed between 170 and 206 km/h. Engine capacity here ranges from 1332 to 1497 cm3, boasting torque figures up to 330 Nm.
Mazda has equipped the CX-30 with a fuel consumption rate ranging from 5.7 to 6.6 L/100 km, accompanied by a CO2 efficiency class categorized as D and E. The emissions range from 129 to 148 g/km, balancing performance with efficiency.
On the other hand, the Nissan Qashqai shows a consumption range between 5.1 to 6.8 L/100 km and emissions ranging from 116 to 154 g/km, with efficiency classes also in the D and E brackets.
With a length of 4395 mm, width of 1795 mm, and height of 1540 mm, the CX-30 offers a trunk capacity of 422 to 430 liters. Its curb weight oscillates from 1455 to 1587 kg.
The Nissan Qashqai offers slightly bigger dimensions: 4425 mm length, 1835 mm width, and a height of 1625 mm. Its trunk offers 479 to 504 liters of space, and it weighs between 1420 to 1665 kg depending on the model.
The Mazda CX-30 incorporates sleek design philosophies and cutting-edge technology, ensuring that the driver remains engaged with its intuitive interior layout. The offerings in power variations cater to different driving preferences, whether it's a demanding daily routine or weekend getaways.
Conversely, the Nissan Qashqai presents innovation in the form of its hybrid technology and a range of transmission options including a CVT and reduction gearbox. The extended trunk space and efficient fuel consumption make it an attractive option for families and long-distance travelers.
The choice between the Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai ultimately hinges on personal priorities. If a sportier drive and slightly more compact design intrigue you, the CX-30 might be the perfect companion for your journeys. Meanwhile, the Qashqai offers superior efficiency and space, especially appealing to those with a focus on utility without compromising on innovation.
Both cars continue to lead the compact SUV market with their respective strengths, proving once again that technological advancements and practical design can coexist beautifully in the automotive world.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mazda CX-30 has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £ , while the Nissan Qashqai costs 29600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4371 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Nissan Qashqai manages with 4.50 L and is therefore evident more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 1.20 L per 100 km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Qashqai has a hardly perceptible edge – offering 205 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 19 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Qashqai is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 7.60 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 0.70 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Nissan Qashqai pulls noticeable stronger with 330 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 90 Nm difference.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Nissan Qashqai is hardly perceptible lighter – 1420 kg compared to 1455 kg. The difference is around 35 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Nissan Qashqai offers to a small extent more room – 504 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 74 L.
When it comes to payload, Nissan Qashqai barely noticeable takes the win – 520 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 24 kg.
The Nissan Qashqai holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.
details
The Nissan Qashqai blends practical, family-friendly packaging with SUV styling that refuses to shout, making it a sensible and dependable choice for everyday life. It’s comfortable to live with, economical on the road, and neatly equipped enough to feel modern without ever feeling precious — perfect if you want crossover versatility without the drama.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25200 - 36800 £
|
Price
29600 - 39900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
129 - 148 g/km
|
co2
102 - 154 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
|
Curb weight
1420 - 1665 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
|
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4425 mm
|
|
Width
1795 mm
|
Width
1835 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1625 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1422 - 1447 L
|
|
Payload
458 - 496 kg
|
Payload
466 - 520 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 205 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 10.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
170 - 206 km/h
|
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
Torque
240 - 330 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 151 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1332 - 1498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025 - 2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Nissan
|
The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España