Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-30 vs Nissan Qashqai - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (186 HP vs 205 HP), boot space and price (25200 £ vs 29600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Nissan Qashqai?
CX-30
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mazda CX-30 has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £ , while the Nissan Qashqai costs 29600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4371 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Nissan Qashqai manages with 4.50 L and is therefore evident more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 1.20 L per 100 km.
Qashqai
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Qashqai has a hardly perceptible edge – offering 205 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 19 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Qashqai is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 7.60 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 0.70 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Nissan Qashqai pulls noticeable stronger with 330 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 90 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
CX-30
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Nissan Qashqai is hardly perceptible lighter – 1420 kg compared to 1455 kg. The difference is around 35 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Nissan Qashqai offers to a small extent more room – 504 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 74 L.
When it comes to payload, Nissan Qashqai barely noticeable takes the win – 520 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 24 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Nissan Qashqai holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £29,600
Nissan Qashqai
Mazda CX-30
5 (1 Reviews)
The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.
details
Nissan Qashqai
5 (1 Reviews)
The Nissan Qashqai blends practical, family-friendly packaging with SUV styling that refuses to shout, making it a sensible and dependable choice for everyday life. It’s comfortable to live with, economical on the road, and neatly equipped enough to feel modern without ever feeling precious — perfect if you want crossover versatility without the drama.
details
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25200 - 36800 £
|
Price
29600 - 39900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
129 - 148 g/km
|
co2
102 - 154 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
|
Curb weight
1420 - 1665 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
|
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4425 mm
|
|
Width
1795 mm
|
Width
1835 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1625 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1422 - 1447 L
|
|
Payload
458 - 496 kg
|
Payload
466 - 520 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 205 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 10.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
170 - 206 km/h
|
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
Torque
240 - 330 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 151 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1332 - 1498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Nissan
|
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?
The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.