In the competitive compact SUV market, the MG ZS and Nissan Qashqai stand out with their unique offerings and charm. The MG ZS delivers remarkable value with its robust features and spacious interior, appealing to budget-conscious buyers, while the Nissan Qashqai impresses with its refined driving dynamics and premium feel. Ultimately, choosing between these two contenders will depend on whether consumers prioritize affordability or a more upscale driving experience.
When it comes to compact SUVs, the MG ZS and Nissan Qashqai are two popular options that offer a mix of performance, technology, and style. In this comparison, we’ll delve into the technical specifications and innovative features that set these two models apart.
The MG ZS boasts a modern SUV design with a length ranging from 4323 mm to 4430 mm, a width of approximately 1809 mm, and a height of 1649 mm. In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai stands slightly taller at 1625 mm, with a length of 4425 mm and a width of 1835 mm. Both vehicles offer five-door configurations and the same seating capacity for five passengers, but the Qashqai provides a larger trunk capacity of 504 liters compared to the ZS's 448 liters.
When it comes to powertrains, the MG ZS offers an impressive range of engine options, including electric and full hybrid variants. The available power outputs range from 156 to 197 HP, with acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 8.6 seconds. On the other hand, the Nissan Qashqai is powered by petrol MHEV and full hybrid engines, producing between 140 to 190 HP. Its acceleration can reach 100 km/h in as fast as 7.9 seconds, making it a sporty option in the compact SUV segment.
Efficiency is key in the SUV market, and here both models show strengths. The MG ZS offers fuel consumption rates between 5 to 5.1 L/100km for its hybrid variants, alongside impressive electric efficiency of around 17.3 to 17.8 kWh/100km for its electric model. The electric range also stands out, with a maximum range of 440 km. The Nissan Qashqai, however, offers competitive fuel consumption rates as well, at approximately 5.1 to 6.8 L/100km, depending on the variant chosen.
Both SUVs are laden with technology, but they do cater to slightly different audiences. The MG ZS emphasizes a user-friendly infotainment system that includes a digital cockpit and multiple connectivity options. It is designed to enhance user interaction and integrate seamlessly with smartphones. The Nissan Qashqai, renowned for its advanced safety features, offers ProPILOT technology, which aids in both highway driving and navigation. The Qashqai also impresses with a cutting-edge infotainment experience, featuring a customizable digital dashboard and intuitive touchscreen controls.
In terms of driving dynamics, the MG ZS offers a comfortable ride with its front-wheel-drive configuration and adequate performance for city driving. It features a torquey engine lineup, delivering up to 280 Nm of torque, which allows for a pleasant and engaging driving experience. Meanwhile, the Nissan Qashqai includes both front-wheel and all-wheel-drive options, catering to a wider range of driving conditions and preferences. With up to 330 Nm of torque, the Qashqai provides robust performance, especially in hybrid variants.
In summary, both the MG ZS and Nissan Qashqai offer compelling packages in the compact SUV category. The ZS shines with its electric options and high-tech features, making it perfect for eco-conscious drivers, while the Qashqai stands out with its performance capabilities and advanced safety technologies. Ultimately, the choice between these two will depend on individual priorities, whether it be fuel efficiency, driving experience, or innovative features.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 18000 - 34300
£
|
Price
about 29300 - 42400
£
|
Consumption L/100km
5 - 6.5
L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.8
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.3 - 17.8
kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
320 - 440
km
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
49.3 - 65.7
kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
0, 113, 115, 145
g/km
|
co2
116 - 154
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
41
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1380 - 1620
kg
|
Curb weight
1420 - 1665
kg
|
Trunk capacity
443 - 448
L
|
Trunk capacity
479 - 504
L
|
Length
4323 - 4430
mm
|
Length
4425
mm
|
Width
1809 - 1818
mm
|
Width
1835
mm
|
Height
1635 - 1649
mm
|
Height
1625
mm
|
Payload
450 - 490
kg
|
Payload
466 - 520
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Electric, Full Hybrid, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Schaltgetriebe
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
116 - 197
HP
|
Power HP
140 - 190
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.6 - 8.7
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 - 10.2
s
|
Max Speed
168 - 175
km/h
|
Max Speed
170 - 206
km/h
|
Torque
280
Nm
|
Torque
240 - 330
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Power kW
85 - 145
kW
|
Power kW
103 - 140
kW
|
Engine capacity
1498
cm3
|
Engine capacity
1332 - 1497
cm3
|
Top speed
168 - 175
km/h
|
Top speed
170 - 206
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2021 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
|
Brand
MG
|
Brand
Nissan
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.