Compare performance (197 HP vs 205 HP), boot space and price (18000 £ vs 29600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG ZS or Nissan Qashqai?
The compact crossover clash pits the refreshingly affordable MG ZS against the seasoned and polished Nissan Qashqai. One plays the value card with bold styling and a friendly personality, the other leans on refinement and a reassuringly grown-up demeanor. It’s a duel between enthusiasm and composure, and whether you want to show savvy or stick to a safe bet depends on your daily priorities.
The MG ZS is an extrovert — bright face, eager grille and an energy that says “look at me” without trying too hard, while the Nissan Qashqai is the sleek neighbour that ages well and signals quiet confidence. The ZS flirts with trendiness and youthful optimism, the Qashqai prefers sculpted lines and a cultivated presence. Depending on whether you want to announce your arrival or blend in with a touch of class, each makes a distinct visual promise.
For runaround errands and school drops the MG ZS feels straightforward and forgiving, with ergonomics aimed at making life easier rather than thrilling; it’s uncomplicated and friendly in traffic. The Nissan Qashqai trades a bit of that raw simplicity for composed road manners and a sense of solidity on longer trips, which helps when motorway miles become routine. Both know how to carry a family, but they deliver different types of comfort — one is cheerful and light-footed, the other composed and reassuring.
Buyers of the MG ZS will talk about smart shopping and getting more car for the money, and they’ll enjoy the feeling of value without apologising for it. Owners of the Nissan Qashqai will point to a more mature cabin feel, a confident road presence and the comfort of a name with long experience in the segment. Both choices come with their own bragging rights: either savvy practicality or a quietly assured ownership story.
If what matters to you is stretching your budget while keeping everyday life uncomplicated, the MG ZS makes a persuasive case with straightforward features and a generous personality. It suits buyers who put practicality and running costs near the top of the list, commuters who want ease-of-use and families that value simplicity over flash. Expect contentment from immediate usability rather than a relentless pursuit of prestige or sportiness.
If what matters to you is a composed ride, a more polished cabin and the impression a car makes in the driveway, the Nissan Qashqai will likely resonate. It appeals to drivers who favour refinement, longer runs that benefit from composure, and tech or material touches that feel just a bit more mature. If you’re anticipating regular motorways, family trips or want to lean on brand familiarity, this is the side that feels like a considered step up; read on for the full spec-by-spec picture.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
MG ZS has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 18000 £ , while the Nissan Qashqai costs 29600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11614 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Nissan Qashqai manages with 4.50 L and is therefore slightly more efficient than the MG ZS with 5 L. The difference is about 0.50 L per 100 km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Qashqai has a slight edge – offering 205 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 8 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Qashqai is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 7.60 s, while the MG ZS takes 8.70 s. That’s about 1.10 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Nissan Qashqai performs a bit better – reaching 206 km/h, while the MG ZS tops out at 179 km/h. The difference is around 27 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Nissan Qashqai pulls clearly stronger with 330 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 182 Nm difference.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, MG ZS is hardly perceptible lighter – 1330 kg compared to 1420 kg. The difference is around 90 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Nissan Qashqai offers a bit more room – 504 L compared to 443 L. That’s a difference of about 61 L.
In maximum load capacity, the MG ZS performs minimal better – up to 1457 L, which is about 10 L more than the Nissan Qashqai.
When it comes to payload, Nissan Qashqai slight takes the win – 520 kg compared to 470 kg. That’s a difference of about 50 kg.
The Nissan Qashqai is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The MG ZS arrives as a cheeky and practical choice for shoppers who want SUV style and family-friendly space without blowing the budget. It may not pretend to be premium, but with sensible equipment, easy-to-live-with driving manners and surprising value, it makes a persuasive case for anyone after sensible transport with a bit of personality.
details
The Nissan Qashqai blends practical, family-friendly packaging with SUV styling that refuses to shout, making it a sensible and dependable choice for everyday life. It’s comfortable to live with, economical on the road, and neatly equipped enough to feel modern without ever feeling precious — perfect if you want crossover versatility without the drama.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
18000 - 24000 £
|
Price
29600 - 39900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5 - 6.5 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
113 - 145 g/km
|
co2
102 - 154 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
41 - 55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1330 - 1420 kg
|
Curb weight
1420 - 1665 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
443 L
|
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
|
|
Length
4430 mm
|
Length
4425 mm
|
|
Width
1818 mm
|
Width
1835 mm
|
|
Height
1635 mm
|
Height
1625 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1457 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1422 - 1447 L
|
|
Payload
375 - 470 kg
|
Payload
466 - 520 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 205 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 10.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
168 - 179 km/h
|
Max Speed
170 - 206 km/h
|
|
Torque
148 Nm
|
Torque
240 - 330 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 151 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1495 - 1498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1332 - 1498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
|
Brand
MG
|
Brand
Nissan
|
The MG ZS is available as Front-Wheel Drive.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España