Compare performance (180 HP vs 205 HP), boot space and price (29100 £ vs 29600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Niro or Nissan Qashqai?
When it comes to the compact SUV segment, the Kia Niro and Nissan Qashqai often come up as top contenders. With a focus on sustainability and modern technology, both these models feature innovations that cater to a wide variety of needs. Let's dive into the details of what makes each of these SUVs unique and which might be the perfect fit for you.
The 2024 Kia Niro offers an impressive lineup with Full Hybrid and Plug-in Hybrid powertrains. The Full Hybrid version delivers 129 HP, while the Plug-in Hybrid punches out 171 HP, courtesy of its dual-clutch automatic transmission and front-wheel drive system. Moreover, with an electric range of up to 65 km, the Niro ensures fuel efficiency with consumption figures as low as 0.8 L/100km, making it an attractive choice for eco-conscious drivers.
On the other hand, the Nissan Qashqai comes with a variety of engine options, including Petrol MHEV and Full Hybrid powertrains. With output options ranging from 140 HP to 190 HP, the Qashqai manages to balance power with efficiency. The manual and CVT automatic transmissions paired with either front-wheel or all-wheel drive offer flexibility for different driving preferences. Though its fuel consumption starts at a slightly higher 5.1 L/100km, the Qashqai's well-rounded performance appeals to those seeking versatility.
In terms of dimensions, the Kia Niro is slightly more compact, measuring 4420 mm in length, 1825 mm in width, and 1545 mm in height. This size, combined with its sleek design, offers a modern look without compromising the spaciousness required for comfortable travel. With a trunk capacity of 451 liters, the Niro holds its ground in practicality.
The Nissan Qashqai, while slightly larger at 4425 mm in length, 1835 mm in width, and 1625 mm in height, offers more roominess, making it an ideal choice for families. With a notable trunk capacity of up to 504 liters, the Qashqai doesn’t fall short in terms of practicality, either.
Both SUVs come equipped with modern technological features that enhance the driving experience. The Kia Niro is laden with a suite of safety features and infotainment options that integrate seamlessly into daily life. Key highlights include advanced driver-assistance systems and connectivity features that make every journey safe and enjoyable.
The Nissan Qashqai stands out with its innovative technology as well, offering an advanced infotainment system and a plethora of driver-assistance features. Its commitment to providing a futuristic driving experience can be seen through features such as its ProPILOT, which offers semi-autonomous driving capabilities under certain conditions.
Choosing between the Kia Niro and the Nissan Qashqai ultimately boils down to personal preferences and priorities. The Kia Niro is perfect for those who prioritize eco-friendliness and efficient performance, making it a great option for city dwellers and environmental enthusiasts alike.
Alternatively, the Nissan Qashqai, with its variety of powertrains and flexible drive options, appeals to those seeking versatility and advanced technology in their SUV. This makes it an ideal contender for families or adventurers who require a reliable and spacious vehicle.
In the end, either vehicle delivers a remarkable combination of performance, design, and innovation, cementing their status as leading players in the compact SUV market.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Kia Niro has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 29100 £ , while the Nissan Qashqai costs 29600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 471 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Kia Niro manages with 2.40 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Nissan Qashqai with 4.50 L. The difference is about 2.10 L per 100 km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Qashqai has a somewhat edge – offering 205 HP compared to 180 HP. That’s roughly 25 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Qashqai is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 7.60 s, while the Kia Niro takes 9.90 s. That’s about 2.30 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Nissan Qashqai performs slightly better – reaching 206 km/h, while the Kia Niro tops out at 185 km/h. The difference is around 21 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Nissan Qashqai pulls slightly stronger with 330 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 65 Nm difference.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Nissan Qashqai is barely noticeable lighter – 1420 kg compared to 1474 kg. The difference is around 54 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Nissan Qashqai offers to a small extent more room – 504 L compared to 451 L. That’s a difference of about 53 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Nissan Qashqai performs slight better – up to 1447 L, which is about 2 L more than the Kia Niro.
When it comes to payload, Nissan Qashqai to a small extent takes the win – 520 kg compared to 466 kg. That’s a difference of about 54 kg.
The Kia Niro comes out ahead with a more balanced overall result in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Kia Niro blends clever packaging and modern styling into a compact crossover that’s refreshingly sensible for daily life. It’s comfortable, economical and packed with user‑friendly tech, so if you want a fuss‑free family car with a touch of green credibility, the Niro is worth a test drive.
details
The Nissan Qashqai blends practical, family-friendly packaging with SUV styling that refuses to shout, making it a sensible and dependable choice for everyday life. It’s comfortable to live with, economical on the road, and neatly equipped enough to feel modern without ever feeling precious — perfect if you want crossover versatility without the drama.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29100 - 38600 £
|
Price
29600 - 39900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.4 - 4.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
57 - 62 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
1.3 - 11.1 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
53 - 111 g/km
|
co2
102 - 154 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
37 - 42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1474 - 1594 kg
|
Curb weight
1420 - 1665 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
348 - 451 L
|
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
|
|
Length
4420 mm
|
Length
4425 mm
|
|
Width
1825 mm
|
Width
1835 mm
|
|
Height
1545 mm
|
Height
1625 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1342 - 1445 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1422 - 1447 L
|
|
Payload
466 kg
|
Payload
466 - 520 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
138 - 180 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 205 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.9 - 11.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 10.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
170 - 185 km/h
|
Max Speed
170 - 206 km/h
|
|
Torque
265 Nm
|
Torque
240 - 330 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
102 - 132 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 151 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1580 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1332 - 1498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
|
Brand
Kia
|
Brand
Nissan
|
The Kia Niro is available as Front-Wheel Drive.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España