VS

MG ZS vs Nissan Juke comparison

Compare performance (197 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (18,000 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG ZS or Nissan Juke?

MG ZS vs Nissan Juke: Key differences

MG ZS

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately cheaper
  • visibly more power
  • somewhat quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally more trunk space
details

Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly more efficient
  • marginally lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

ZS

MG ZS VS Nissan Juke — quick verdict for shoppers

MG ZS VS Nissan Juke sets up a clear personality clash: the MG ZS markets space, hybrid thrust and bargain appeal, while the Nissan Juke trades on city agility, sharper styling and a modern cockpit. The MG ZS feels like a pragmatic family SUV that prioritises rear room, kit and a reassuring warranty, whereas the Nissan Juke is more of a city‑first character car that rewards short trips and tight streets. Price and equipment lean in favour of the MG ZS, but the Juke brings a nicer touchscreen, wireless smartphone mirroring and a tidier dash layout. Read on to see how those different strengths play out in daily life and which compromises matter most to you.

Juke

Driving character and on‑road behaviour

The MG ZS drives with a pronounced hybrid shove — it feels eager from standstill and masks some gearbox fuss in town, which makes progress feel effortless in urban traffic. The Nissan Juke is lighter on its feet, with quicker steering and a more engaged, city‑friendly demeanour that makes lane changes and parking less of a chore. Where the MG ZS trades for power and a planted feeling, it also carries a firmer suspension and more engine/road noise under load that blunts long‑distance serenity. The Juke can feel more entertaining up to moderate speeds, but at motorway pace it gets nervous on big wheels and the engine becomes intrusive, so the fun factor comes with limits.

ZS

Comfort, NVH and long‑distance usability

If long runs matter, neither car is a sanctuary but they err in different ways: the MG ZS offers noticeably more rear space and a forgiving seating position, yet wind and tyre roar plus a taut ride reduce cruising composure. The Nissan Juke is less roomy in the back and its small rear windows make longer trips for rear passengers feel more tiring, while larger wheels can make highway surfaces feel choppy. On monotonous motorway miles the ZS’s extra space makes a difference for passengers, but the Juke’s firmer, more compact setup can be less fatiguing for solo drivers in city‑to‑motorway swaps. In short, choose the MG ZS for seating comfort on longer family journeys and the Nissan Juke if most trips are short, urban and you prioritise driving immediacy.

Juke

Cabin feel, tech and perceived quality

The Nissan Juke’s facelifted interior feels fresher and more considered: physical climate controls, a crisp digital display and wireless phone mirroring give it a more modern, upmarket vibe in daily use. The MG ZS counters with a roomy layout and a long list of standard driver aids, but the plastics, trim and touchscreen ergonomics feel more budget‑minded and rely on cable‑connected phone integration. Both cabins have practical strengths, yet they project different messages — the Juke aims for polish and convenience, the ZS for value and functionality. Warranty and included equipment are a practical comfort in the MG ZS, while the Juke wins points for connectivity and user‑friendly controls.

ZS

Practicality and family usability

Practical buyers will notice real differences: the MG ZS is the easier family car with a larger boot opening, generous rear legroom and straightforward ISOFIX access, which makes daily school runs and loading a pushchair less fiddly. The Nissan Juke’s compact footprint helps in tight city parking but comes with a higher load sill and a smaller rear area — the hybrid option also trims cargo space further. If you routinely carry passengers, luggage or bulky items, the MG ZS’s usable space and lower ownership cost are persuasive; if you live in the city, rarely need the rear seat for adults and want something nimbler, the Juke’s packaging will feel more appropriate. Each car trades storage and practicality against manoeuvrability in a way that will quickly separate family buyers from solo urban commuters.

Juke

Who should pick which — buyer fit and next steps

Choose the MG ZS if you prioritise rear space, straightforward family practicality, generous standard kit and a strong value proposition with big warranty cover; it suits cost‑conscious families and mixed urban/commute drivers who want hybrid assistance without a premium price. Opt for the Nissan Juke if you want a compact, style‑forward crossover with a nicer cockpit, wireless connectivity and sharper city manners; it’s aimed at singles or couples who favour design and tech over maximum luggage capacity. Both make compromises on long‑distance refinement and each answers different daily needs, so use that frame when you move to the technical comparison to see exact differences in power delivery, boot volumes and measured consumption that will finalize which trade‑offs you can live with.

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS and Omoda 5 are two popular compact SUVs that target value-conscious buyers with generous equipment and modern styling. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how they differ in interior space, build quality, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the one that fits …
Nissan Juke
Opel Corsa
VS
The Nissan Juke is the cheeky crossover that turns heads with its funky looks and raised stance, promising a slightly sportier feel and SUV attitude for buyers who want personality over practicality. The Opel Corsa, by contrast, is the sensible, well-rounded hatchback — more economical, easier to …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ZS

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

MG ZS is moderately cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the Nissan Juke costs 21,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,394 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Nissan Juke uses 4.7 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the MG ZS with 5.1 L/100km. The difference is about 0.4 L/100km.

Juke

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the MG ZS offers visibly more power – delivering 197 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 54 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG ZS is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 8.7 s, while the Nissan Juke takes 10.1 s. That’s about 1.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Juke delivers markedly more torque with 200 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 52 Nm more.

ZS

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan Juke is marginally lighter – 1,274 kg compared to 1,330 kg. The difference is around 56 kg.

Looking at boot space, the MG ZS offers marginally more boot space – 443 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 21 L.

When it comes to payload, the MG ZS carries barely more – 470 kg compared to 427 kg. That’s a difference of about 43 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MG ZS comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £18,000
ZS

MG ZS

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 116 - 197 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
details
MG ZS
Nissan Juke

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MG ZS

The MG ZS is a compact crossover that delivers strong value with a roomy cabin and straightforward tech, making it a sensible choice for budget-minded buyers. It’s easy to live with, offering comfortable rides and a practical layout that suits daily commutes and family errands.

details
MG-ZS-EV-dynamic
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-07
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-21
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-luxury_interior
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-16

Reviews MG ZS

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
Constantin
9 Jun 2026, 22:34:01

I replaced my Dacia Jogger with an MG ZS Hybrid and I don't regret it.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Ahmed
30 Sept 2025, 14:05:11

With all the features it offers at that price, the MG has no competition. A BMW X1 of similar dimensions with a few extra upgrades costs more than twice as much, and considering that 40% of MG’s spare parts come from Germany (Bosch, Continental, etc.), I’d go for the MG ZS Hybrid without a second thought.

Nissan Juke

The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.

details
Fahraufnahmen (7)
Exterieur statisch (2)
Exterieur statisch (12)
Interieur (25)

Reviews Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Ali Shan
8 Dec 2025, 11:29:27

For more space and Efficiency, I would prefer Juke 1.5 Specially Accenta.

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Nissan Qashqai
VS
Cheap and cheerful, the MG ZS punches above its price with a roomy, gadget-heavy cabin and surprisingly sprightly electric options, while the Nissan Qashqai feels more grown-up — quieter, better driven and tougher to fault on long motorway runs. Pick the ZS if you want maximum kit for your money; …
Kia Sportage
MG ZS
VS
The Kia Sportage and MG ZS are compact SUVs aimed at buyers who want practical, everyday family transport—each offers a different mix of comfort, technology and value. This quick comparison shows how the Sportage’s more refined ride and stronger engine choices compare with the ZS’s budget-friendly …
MG MG3
MG ZS
VS
Choosing between the compact MG3 hatchback and the larger MG ZS crossover comes down to whether you prioritise city-friendly agility and low running costs or interior space and practicality. This comparison covers driving character, equipment, fuel economy and ownership costs to help you pick the …
Nissan Juke
SEAT Arona
VS
The Nissan Juke and SEAT Arona are rival compact crossovers that blend city-friendly dimensions with SUV styling, yet they take markedly different approaches to design, driving feel and practicality. This comparison highlights the key strengths and compromises of each so you can quickly decide …
Nissan Juke
Opel Mokka
VS
The Nissan Juke is a cheeky, compact crossover with bulging arches, zesty handling and personality to spare, while the Opel Mokka takes a more grown-up route — solid, spacious and quietly efficient with a neater cabin and calmer ride. Pick the Juke if you want to stand out and have fun on twisty …
Nissan Juke
Toyota Yaris
VS
Choosing between the Nissan Juke and the Toyota Yaris means deciding if you want a bold, compact crossover with distinctive styling or a practical, efficient small hatchback renowned for reliability. I’ll compare driving feel, interior space, running costs and features to help you pick the one that …
Ford Kuga
MG ZS
VS
The Ford Kuga and MG ZS are compact SUVs that both promise practicality and value, but they target different priorities: the Kuga leans toward sharper handling, a more refined cabin and a wider range of powertrains, while the ZS focuses on affordability and simple, roomy practicality. Choose the …
MG ZS
Renault Captur
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the MG ZS and Renault Captur stand out with their distinct offerings. The MG ZS impresses with its value for money, spacious interior, and a suite of modern technology, making it a strong contender for budget-conscious buyers. Meanwhile, the Renault Captur …
MG ZS
Nissan Juke

Costs and Consumption
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
Price
21,400 - 30,100 £
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
115 - 145 g/km
co2
105 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
Curb weight
1,274 - 1,405 kg
Trunk capacity
443 L
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,818 mm
Width
1,800 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
375 - 470 kg
Payload
405 - 427 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
148 Nm
Torque
200 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
Brand
MG
Brand
Nissan
What drive types are available for the MG ZS?

The MG ZS is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.