VS

MG ZS vs Vauxhall Frontera comparison

Compare performance (197 HP vs 145 HP), boot space and price (18,000 £ vs 20,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG ZS or Vauxhall Frontera?

MG ZS vs Vauxhall Frontera: Key differences

MG ZS

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • marginally more efficient
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally lighter
details

Vauxhall Frontera

4.1 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

ZS

MG ZS vs. Vauxhall Frontera: A Comprehensive Comparison

In the ever-evolving automotive landscape, choosing the right vehicle can be a daunting task, particularly when faced with capable contenders like the MG ZS and the Vauxhall Frontera. Both these models have carved a niche with their unique offerings, and understanding their technical aspects and innovations can guide potential buyers in making an informed decision. Let’s delve into the details.

Frontera

Design and Dimensions

The MG ZS is a versatile compact SUV, carefully crafted to appeal to urban adventurers. It measures between 4323 mm and 4430 mm in length, with a width of approximately 1818 mm and a height of 1635 mm. With a curb weight ranging from 1380 kg to 1620 kg, the MG ZS strikes a balance between stability and fuel efficiency. Its trunk capacity of 448 liters accommodates everyday storage needs with ease.

The Vauxhall Frontera, classified as an Off-Roader, opts for a bolder stance, boasting a length of 4385 mm, width of 1795 mm, and height of 1635 mm. Weighing in from 1344 kg to 1514 kg, it is slightly lighter than the MG ZS. Noteworthy is its adaptable seating, offering configurations for up to seven passengers, with a trunk capacity of 460 liters.

ZS

Engine and Performance

The MG ZS provides a diverse array of engine choices, including Electric, Full Hybrid, and Petrol options. Its power ranges from 116 HP to a robust 197 HP, with a torque output of 280 Nm, translating to a noteworthy acceleration from 0-100 km/h in approximately 8.6 seconds. The electric variant promises a formidable range of up to 440 km on a single charge, backed by a battery capacity that peaks at 65.7 kWh.

Conversely, the Vauxhall Frontera stands out with its Petrol MHEV and Electric engines. Its power output spans from 100 HP to 136 HP, with torque reaching up to 230 Nm. This results in a stable acceleration of around 9 to 12.1 seconds for 0-100 km/h. The electric model offers a respectable range of 305 km on a full charge, sustained by an 18.2 kWh consumption rate.

Frontera

Technology and Safety

Technology and safety are at the forefront for both contenders. The MG ZS features a range of modern amenities, including advanced infotainment systems and safety assists geared towards ease of use and driving confidence. Its CO2 efficiency class ranges from A to E, reflecting its commitment to reducing emissions.

Meanwhile, the Vauxhall Frontera doesn’t lag behind, offering cutting-edge technology like a dual-clutch automatic transmission for a smoother ride. Its CO2 emissions class of A and D ensures that it’s a conscious choice for the ecologically inclined driver while providing robust safety features tailored for off-roading adventures.

ZS

Conclusion

The choice between the MG ZS and Vauxhall Frontera ultimately boils down to individual preferences and driving needs. Whether it's MG ZS’s electric offerings and quick acceleration or Vauxhall Frontera's rugged appeal with adaptable seating and tech-savvy innovations, both vehicles offer compelling benefits. Prospective buyers are encouraged to weigh each vehicle's strengths and align them with their lifestyles and priorities.

Frequently compared as well

Citroen C3 Aircross
Opel Frontera
VS
Choosing between the Citroën C3 Aircross and the Opel Frontera comes down to whether you want a compact, comfort-focused crossover or a more traditionally rugged SUV. The C3 Aircross shines with clever packaging, ride comfort and economy, while the Frontera offers stronger towing, load capacity and …
Opel Frontera
Opel Mokka
VS
Comparing the Opel Frontera and the Opel Mokka highlights two very different takes on the SUV idea: the Frontera is a rugged, older off‑road capable SUV, while the Mokka is a modern compact crossover built for city life and efficiency. This short guide will walk through their real‑world strengths …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ZS

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

MG ZS is somewhat cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the Vauxhall Frontera costs 20,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,743 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the MG ZS uses 5.1 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the Vauxhall Frontera with 5.2 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.

Frontera

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the MG ZS offers markedly more power – delivering 197 HP compared to 145 HP. That’s roughly 52 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG ZS is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 8.7 s, while the Vauxhall Frontera takes 9.1 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Vauxhall Frontera delivers markedly more torque with 230 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 82 Nm more.

ZS

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Vauxhall Frontera offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, MG ZS is marginally lighter – 1,330 kg compared to 1,394 kg. The difference is around 64 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Vauxhall Frontera offers marginally more boot space – 460 L compared to 443 L. That’s a difference of about 17 L.

When it comes to payload, the Vauxhall Frontera carries moderately more – 570 kg compared to 470 kg. That’s a difference of about 100 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Vauxhall Frontera stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £20,700
Frontera

Vauxhall Frontera

  • Engine Type Electric, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 110 - 145 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.2 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.7 - 18.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 308 - 400 km
details
MG ZS
Vauxhall Frontera

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MG ZS

The MG ZS is a compact crossover that delivers strong value with a roomy cabin and straightforward tech, making it a sensible choice for budget-minded buyers. It’s easy to live with, offering comfortable rides and a practical layout that suits daily commutes and family errands.

details
MG-ZS-EV-dynamic
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-07
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-21
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-luxury_interior
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-16

Reviews MG ZS

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
Constantin
9 Jun 2026, 22:34:01

I replaced my Dacia Jogger with an MG ZS Hybrid and I don't regret it.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Ahmed
30 Sept 2025, 14:05:11

With all the features it offers at that price, the MG has no competition. A BMW X1 of similar dimensions with a few extra upgrades costs more than twice as much, and considering that 40% of MG’s spare parts come from Germany (Bosch, Continental, etc.), I’d go for the MG ZS Hybrid without a second thought.

Vauxhall Frontera

The Opel Frontera is a rugged, no-nonsense SUV that balances off-road capability with comfortable everyday driving. It offers straightforward mechanics and a practical cabin, making it a sensible choice for buyers who value durability over flash.

details
NewOpelFronteraElectric
NewOpelFronteraElectric (1)
NewOpelFronteraElectric (2)
NewOpelFronteraElectric (3)
NewOpelFronteraElectric (4)
NewOpelFronteraElectric (5)
NewOpelFronteraElectric (7)

Reviews Vauxhall Frontera

4.1 (7 Reviews)
rate
Pascal
5 Jun 2026, 04:10:37

A thoroughly bad cheap car. Feels like a C3 Aircross for the poor.

That's a reason to change employers! Terrible car.

It already has a nickname, "Klapperchen"

I think any Dacia is better!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Roch
18 May 2026, 10:12:50

Automatic gearbox and certain features, like the windshield wipers that aren’t optional; the trunk capacity is larger on the 5-seat Frontera.

Wolfgang
6 May 2026, 04:24:52

I just like the Opel better (maybe only because I'm very disappointed in VW and therefore also in its subsidiaries).

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Gilbert
14 Apr 2026, 08:19:17

I bought the Opel Frontera GS 145PS after also testing the VW T‑Roc; so far I've driven about 5,800 km in it.

My purchase decision was based on the following criteria:
- modern design that stands out from the crowd
- low fuel consumption
- very good seats and plenty of space front and rear
- large, practical boot
- good performance characteristics
- very easy to get into
- simple controls, partly with physical buttons
- clear, well‑laid‑out cockpit

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
H. P.
19 Dec 2025, 13:27:19

Opel has clearly skimped here. Misaligned panel gaps, no position/parking light, patchy workmanship and ill‑fitting parts — for example the partition between the passenger footwell and the engine bay — the owner's manual is inadequate and at times reads like a fairy tale; many of the functions it describes are nowhere to be found. They simply don't exist. And the claimed fuel consumption? Even with normal driving — that is, without acceleration orgies — it's unattainable.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS and Omoda 5 are two popular compact SUVs that target value-conscious buyers with generous equipment and modern styling. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how they differ in interior space, build quality, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the one that fits …
Opel Frontera
Opel Grandland
VS
The Frontera feels like a bruiser from the analogue era — raw, rugged and surprisingly capable off-road, ideal if you crave adventure and don't mind a bit of mechanical charm. The Grandland, by contrast, is a slick, family-friendly crossover loaded with modern tech, efficient engines and a …
Opel Frontera
Peugeot 2008
VS
If you want unashamedly rugged, the Opel Frontera still wears its rough‑and‑ready off‑road badge with chunky looks and simple, go‑anywhere mechanics, whereas the Peugeot 2008 plays the smarter, city‑first crossover with sleek styling and the tech you actually use every day. Pick the Frontera for …
Dacia Duster
Opel Frontera
VS
The Dacia Duster is the sensible new-school pick — affordable, economical and surprisingly well packaged with modern safety and infotainment for the money; the Opel Frontera, meanwhile, is a proper old-school body-on-frame bruiser that still appeals to buyers who prize simple, rugged off-road …
MG ZS
Nissan Qashqai
VS
Cheap and cheerful, the MG ZS punches above its price with a roomy, gadget-heavy cabin and surprisingly sprightly electric options, while the Nissan Qashqai feels more grown-up — quieter, better driven and tougher to fault on long motorway runs. Pick the ZS if you want maximum kit for your money; …
Kia Sportage
MG ZS
VS
The Kia Sportage and MG ZS are compact SUVs aimed at buyers who want practical, everyday family transport—each offers a different mix of comfort, technology and value. This quick comparison shows how the Sportage’s more refined ride and stronger engine choices compare with the ZS’s budget-friendly …
Opel Frontera
Renault R4
VS
Choosing between the Opel Frontera and the Renault 4 is a clash of eras and purpose: the Frontera brings 1990s SUV practicality and off‑road capability, while the Renault 4 (commonly called the R4) offers lightweight simplicity and economical charm. This comparison will focus on how their design, …
Opel Frontera
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Opel Frontera and Suzuki Vitara are both compact SUVs that appeal to buyers who want a capable, practical vehicle, but they take different approaches — the Frontera leans toward a sturdier, more spacious package while the Vitara focuses on light off-road ability, efficiency and city-friendly …
MG ZS
Vauxhall Frontera

Costs and Consumption
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
Price
20,700 - 30,000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 18.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
308 - 400 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
115 - 145 g/km
co2
0 - 118 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
Curb weight
1,394 - 1,610 kg
Trunk capacity
443 L
Trunk capacity
460 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,818 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
375 - 470 kg
Payload
436 - 570 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
Power HP
110 - 145 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 - 14.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
148 Nm
Torque
125 - 230 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
Power kW
81 - 107 kW
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
Brand
MG
Brand
Vauxhall
What drive types are available for the MG ZS?

The MG ZS is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.