In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Kona and Nissan Qashqai stand out for their unique blend of style and practicality. The Kona offers a more youthful design and engaging driving dynamics, while the Qashqai boasts a reputation for comfort and spaciousness. Ultimately, the choice between these two popular models comes down to personal preferences in aesthetics and driving experience.
In the ever-competitive compact SUV segment, the 2024 Hyundai Kona and Nissan Qashqai stand out with their distinctive features and capabilities. Both vehicles cater to the needs of modern drivers, offering a mix of performance, technology, and practicality. This article delves into a detailed comparison of these two popular models, focusing on their technical aspects and innovations.
The Hyundai Kona boasts a versatile lineup, offering options ranging from petrol to full hybrid and electric variants. Drivers can choose between a manual gearbox or sophisticated automatic options like a dual-clutch transmission. Power outputs vary from 100 to 218 HP, while the acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h ranges from a leisurely 13.3 seconds to an impressive 7.8 seconds for the sportier versions.
On the other hand, the Nissan Qashqai also presents a strong engine lineup, featuring petrol mild-hybrid and full hybrid configurations, with power outputs between 140 and 190 HP. With acceleration times peaking at 7.9 seconds, it's evident that Nissan's offering is designed for those who prioritize both performance and efficiency.
Efficiency is an important factor in today’s automotive market. The Hyundai Kona shines with impressive fuel consumption figures, ranging from 4.5 to 6.7 L/100 km, depending on the chosen engine. The electric variant further enhances efficiency with a consumption rate of approximately 14.6 kWh/100 km and an electric range of up to 514 km.
The Nissan Qashqai, while slightly less fuel-efficient than the Kona, still offers competitive consumption figures between 5.1 and 6.3 L/100 km. This makes it a viable option for the environmentally conscious consumer. The larger fuel tank capacity of 55 liters also means fewer stops at the pump during longer journeys.
Both the Hyundai Kona and Nissan Qashqai prioritize interior space and comfort. The Kona provides ample trunk capacity of 466 liters, which can easily accommodate everyday luggage. Its compact dimensions contribute to a sporty yet spacious cabin experience.
The Qashqai takes practicality a step further with a slightly larger trunk capacity of 504 liters, ensuring that it can handle both family adventures and daily commuting needs. The additional height of the Qashqai, which stands at 1625 mm compared to the Kona's 1585 mm, gives it a more commanding view of the road.
Hyundai has outfitted the Kona with cutting-edge technology, including advanced connectivity features, a comprehensive driver-assistance system, and a user-friendly infotainment interface. Innovations such as lane-keeping assist and adaptive cruise control enhance safety while driving.
The Nissan Qashqai does not lag in this department either, showcasing its ProPILOT Assist technology, which combines cruise control and lane-keeping assistance for a semi-autonomous driving experience. The Qashqai’s advanced infotainment system is designed to keep drivers connected and informed on the move.
Choosing between the Hyundai Kona and the Nissan Qashqai ultimately depends on personal preferences and priorities. If you're looking for a diverse engine lineup with outstanding electric options and dynamic driving performance, the Kona may be the better fit. Conversely, if you prioritize a spacious interior, innovative semi-autonomous features, and a slightly larger trunk capacity, the Qashqai might be your SUV of choice.
In conclusion, both vehicles offer a unique blend of style, performance, and practicality, catering to the diverse needs of compact SUV enthusiasts. Depending on your specific requirements, either model could be an excellent addition to your driveway.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 22600 - 41600
£
|
Price
about 29300 - 42400
£
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6.7
L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.8
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.8
kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
377 - 514
km
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
1.3 - 65.4
kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
128, 103, 141, 152, 0
g/km
|
co2
116 - 154
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
38 - 47
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1370 - 1773
kg
|
Curb weight
1420 - 1665
kg
|
Trunk capacity
466
L
|
Trunk capacity
479 - 504
L
|
Length
4350 - 4385
mm
|
Length
4425
mm
|
Width
1825
mm
|
Width
1835
mm
|
Height
1580 - 1585
mm
|
Height
1625
mm
|
Payload
420 - 490
kg
|
Payload
466 - 520
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
100 - 218
HP
|
Power HP
140 - 190
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 - 13.3
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 - 10.2
s
|
Max Speed
162 - 208
km/h
|
Max Speed
170 - 206
km/h
|
Torque
200 - 265
Nm
|
Torque
240 - 330
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Power kW
74 - 160
kW
|
Power kW
103 - 140
kW
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1598
cm3
|
Engine capacity
1332 - 1497
cm3
|
Top speed
162 - 208
km/h
|
Top speed
170 - 206
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
|
Brand
Hyundai
|
Brand
Nissan
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.