Mazda VS Suzuki

In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who prioritize style and performance. In contrast, the Suzuki S-Cross offers a more practical approach with its spacious cabin and impressive fuel efficiency, making it a great choice for families and commuters alike. Ultimately, the decision between these two versatile SUVs will depend on whether buyers value sporty flair or functional reliability in their daily drives.

Mazda

Suzuki

Introducing the Mazda CX-30 and Suzuki S-Cross

In the competitive compact SUV market, two models have emerged that appeal to different types of drivers: the Mazda CX-30 and the Suzuki S-Cross. Both vehicles are packed with innovative features and advanced technology, making them top choices for potential buyers. Let's break down the key aspects of each SUV to determine which one reigns supreme.

Design and Dimensions

The Mazda CX-30 boasts a stylish design with dynamic lines and a sleek profile. Its dimensions measure 4395 mm in length, 1795 mm in width, and 1540 mm in height, providing a substantial presence on the road. In contrast, the Suzuki S-Cross is slightly smaller, measuring 4300 mm in length, 1785 mm in width, and 1580 mm in height. While both vehicles can comfortably seat five, the CX-30 offers a trunk capacity of 430 L, which matches that of the S-Cross. However, the S-Cross stands out with its boxier shape that may allow for better headroom.

Powertrain Options and Performance

Performance-wise, the Mazda CX-30 is equipped with petrol MHEV engines that produce up to 186 HP, with torque ratings of 240 Nm, allowing it to accelerate from 0-100 km/h in as little as 8.3 seconds. The CX-30 offers a choice of front-wheel drive or all-wheel drive, and its engine options include a 2.0L to a higher capacity 2.5L engine.

On the other hand, the Suzuki S-Cross features both full hybrid and petrol MHEV engines, generating up to 129 HP and a torque of 235 Nm. The acceleration from 0-100 km/h for the S-Cross is rated at 9.5 seconds, showing that it lags behind the CX-30 in terms of raw performance. Nevertheless, the S-Cross has an edge in fuel efficiency, with consumption figures as low as 5.1 L/100 km, compared to the CX-30's 5.7 to 6.5 L/100 km range.

Transmission and Driving Experience

Both models offer manual and automatic transmission options, catering to various driving preferences. The CX-30 features a more advanced automatic gearbox, enhancing its driving dynamics. In contrast, the S-Cross has an automated manual as one of its transmission options, which may offer a different driving feel. Both vehicles come with front-wheel and all-wheel drive systems, giving consumers the flexibility to choose their level of traction and control.

Interior and Technology

Stepping inside, the Mazda CX-30 offers a premium interior with a focus on driver comfort and usability. High-quality materials and modern technology features, like an intuitive infotainment system and advanced safety systems, enhance the driving experience. The cabin is designed with a sense of openness, complementing the overall sleek design of the vehicle.

The Suzuki S-Cross also provides a well-equipped interior, although it may lack the premium feel that the CX-30 possesses. The S-Cross ensures essential connectivity features are present, but its layout may not be as refined as that of the Mazda. However, Suzuki prioritizes practicality, allowing easy access to storage and functionality.

Fuel Efficiency and Emission Standards

Fuel efficiency is a significant factor for many buyers. The Mazda CX-30 offers respectable fuel consumption figures, depending on the variant, but the Suzuki S-Cross shines when it comes to lower emissions and a more economical stance. This places the S-Cross in a favorable position for environmentally conscious drivers. With CO2 emissions as low as 116 g/km for the Suzuki, it is clear that Suzuki’s hybrid options cater to modern sustainability demands.

Conclusion: Which Should You Choose?

The Mazda CX-30 and Suzuki S-Cross each have unique strengths catering to different audiences. If you prioritize performance, a premium interior, and a sporty design, the CX-30 stands out as the winner. However, for those looking for superior fuel efficiency, practicality, and a potentially lower cost of ownership, the Suzuki S-Cross represents a compelling alternative.

Ultimately, the best choice depends on individual preferences and driving needs. Both vehicles deliver on promise, making the compact SUV segment a vibrant area filled with options and opportunities for buyers.