VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Suzuki S-Cross comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 110 HP), boot space and price (25,200 £ vs 21,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Suzuki S-Cross?

Mazda CX-30 vs Suzuki S-Cross: Key differences

Mazda CX-30

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power

Suzuki S-Cross

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat cheaper
  • barely more efficient
  • somewhat lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

CX-30

Head-to-head: Mazda CX-30 VS Suzuki S-Cross in the compact crossover ring

Mazda CX-30 VS Suzuki S-Cross frames a direct comparison between two smart compact crossover choices aimed at buyers who want the utility of an SUV without the bulk. The Mazda CX-30 arrives with a more sculpted, near-premium feel while the Suzuki S-Cross trades flourish for straightforward, sensible packaging. This comparison spotlights how each model approaches everyday life, from perceived quality to driving character, so you can match car personality to lifestyle. If you’re researching small SUVs to live with day-to-day, these two offer distinct answers to the same brief.

S-Cross

Street personality: poised statement or plain-speaking pragmatism?

The Mazda CX-30 presents itself like the well-dressed guest at the party—taut lines, a driver-focused cockpit and an attitude that favours refinement over shouting. The Suzuki S-Cross is the reliable companion who shows up on time: less emphasis on flair, more on utility and ease of use. Mazda leans toward an expressive, slightly aspirational character, while Suzuki prioritises low-key competence and affordability. That tonal split shapes everything from interior materials to suspension tuning, and it’s obvious the moment you pull away.

CX-30

Daily life: which one copes better with commutes, school runs and trips?

On the daily grind the Suzuki S-Cross feels lighter and more manoeuvrable in town, making tight parking and stop-start traffic less of a chore, whereas the Mazda CX-30 rewards time on the open road with a more settled, composed ride. Families will appreciate the Mazda’s calmer cabin for longer journeys, yet Suzuki’s easy-to-use layout and lower-cost appeal make errands less stressful. Both cars are practical, but they prioritise different parts of real-world life: Suzuki for urban efficiency, Mazda for a more comfortable commute and longer-distance refinement. Choose depending on whether your week is mostly inner-city hops or regular A-road runs.

S-Cross

The story you’ll tell when people ask why you bought it

Choose the Mazda CX-30 and your explanation will likely be about style and how it simply feels nicer to drive—a purchase that reads as tasteful rather than purely sensible. Choose the Suzuki S-Cross and your reasoning will be refreshingly blunt: sensible price, sensible running costs, sensible layout—no drama, just practicality. Mazda sells an image of slightly elevated taste and driver engagement; Suzuki sells thrift and low-stress ownership. Both answers resonate differently at the school run, the office or on a weekend away.

CX-30

If you want the Mazda, who are you most like?

The Mazda CX-30 suits buyers who lean toward comfort and a touch of style—people who want their daily car to feel like a small luxury cocoon rather than a mere appliance. It’s a natural pick for drivers who prize cabin ambience, a composed ride and a cabin that feels a step up from the ordinary. Compared with the Suzuki S-Cross, the Mazda targets those willing to spend a little more for refinement and the pleasure of driving. If calm road manners and nicer materials top your list, the Mazda is the test drive you should book first.

S-Cross

If you want the Suzuki, who are you most like (and remember the Mazda too)?

The Suzuki S-Cross suits rational, pragmatic buyers who prioritise value, low fuss and sensible packaging above style points. It’s the sort of car that rewards the practical thinker: inexpensive to run, easy to live with and built around straightforward usability, whereas the Mazda CX-30 appeals to those ready to trade a bit more money for a refined cabin and sharper road manners. Try both at your dealer—S-Cross will convert the cost-conscious pragmatist, CX-30 the comfort- and design-minded driver. Read on for the detailed breakdown and numbers to see how these impressions stack up in the facts.

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
Suzuki’s compact crossover siblings square off: S-Cross vs Vitara. One leans practical and polished, the other flirts with adventure—let’s find out which Suzuki deserves your driveway and your fuel money.
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Suzuki S-Cross is somewhat cheaper – starting at 21,800 £ , while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,472 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Suzuki S-Cross uses 5.3 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.4 L/100km.

S-Cross

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 offers considerably more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 110 HP. That’s roughly 76 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-30 delivers only slightly more torque with 240 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 5 Nm more.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki S-Cross is somewhat lighter – 1,280 kg compared to 1,455 kg. The difference is around 175 kg.

Boot capacity is identical – both offer 430 L of storage.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-30 carries slightly more – 496 kg compared to 405 kg. That’s a difference of about 91 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-30 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,200
CX-30

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
details
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
Stefan Zapp
31 Jan 2026, 22:32:56

I drive a CX30 with 150 hp. I'm very satisfied with the car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Suzuki S-Cross

The Suzuki S-Cross is a neatly packaged crossover that puts everyday practicality ahead of showy theatrics, offering a comfortable cabin and predictable handling that suit family life and weekend errands alike. It’s not a headline-grabber, but its sensible packaging, low-key charm and reputation for reliability make it a shrewd choice for buyers who prefer smart value over flash.

details
Suzuki_S-Cross_001
Suzuki_S-Cross_004
Suzuki_S-Cross_016
Suzuki_S-Cross_037
Suzuki_S-Cross_040
Suzuki_S-Cross_049
S-CROSS_innen2

Reviews Suzuki S-Cross

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
Miroljub
6 Nov 2025, 11:17:36

best

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Qashqai
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Choosing a compact SUV is more about lifestyle than just luggage space, and in this matchup the Nissan Qashqai brings glossy tech, a classy cabin and composed road manners. The Suzuki S-Cross counters with sensible packaging, economical engines and value that won’t make your wallet faint — which …
Suzuki S-Cross
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross is the sensible family crossover: generous boot, honest equipment and wallet-friendly pricing that make it a practical pick if you prioritise space and value. The Toyota Yaris Cross is the clever city slicker — compact, refined, and available with efficient hybrid power and that …
Suzuki S-Cross
Toyota Corolla Cross
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross is the scrappy, value-packed compact SUV — cheaper to buy, nimbler in town and surprisingly practical, while the Toyota Corolla Cross trades a little driving sparkle for Toyota’s famed refinement, stronger safety kit and an efficient hybrid powertrain. Pick the S‑Cross if you …
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Mazda CX‑30 feels like a premium compact with sharp handling, a beautifully finished interior and a focus on driver enjoyment, while the Nissan Qashqai answers with roomy practicality, comfort and sensible tech for everyday family life. Choose the CX‑30 if you want style and engagement; pick …
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Mazda CX-30 feels like a little premium driver’s car with sharper handling, a beautifully put-together interior and just the sort of polish that makes daily drives more enjoyable, while the Toyota Yaris Cross leans hard into practicality and hybrid efficiency for city life. Pick the CX-30 if …
Mazda CX-30
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 and the VW T-Roc both bring distinct flavors to the table. The Mazda CX-30 is celebrated for its elegant design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a luxurious feel with its high-quality interior and impressive handling. Meanwhile, the …
Hyundai Kona
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Hyundai Kona impresses with its bold design, high-tech features, and engaging driving dynamics, making it a standout choice for those seeking a fun and stylish ride. Meanwhile, the Suzuki S-Cross offers a more practical approach, boasting a spacious …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,200 - 36,800 £
Price
21,800 - 34,200 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
119 - 138 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
47 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Curb weight
1,280 - 1,385 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
430 L
Length
-
Length
4,305 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,785 mm
Height
-
Height
1,580 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,230 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
395 - 405 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
110 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 - 185 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
235 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
81 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Suzuki
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.