@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Suzuki S-Cross – Differences & prices compared

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Suzuki S-Cross?

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Introducing the Mazda CX-30 and Suzuki S-Cross

In the competitive compact SUV market, two models have emerged that appeal to different types of drivers: the Mazda CX-30 and the Suzuki S-Cross. Both vehicles are packed with innovative features and advanced technology, making them top choices for potential buyers. Let's break down the key aspects of each SUV to determine which one reigns supreme.

S-Cross @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Design and Dimensions

The Mazda CX-30 boasts a stylish design with dynamic lines and a sleek profile. Its dimensions measure 4395 mm in length, 1795 mm in width, and 1540 mm in height, providing a substantial presence on the road. In contrast, the Suzuki S-Cross is slightly smaller, measuring 4300 mm in length, 1785 mm in width, and 1580 mm in height. While both vehicles can comfortably seat five, the CX-30 offers a trunk capacity of 430 L, which matches that of the S-Cross. However, the S-Cross stands out with its boxier shape that may allow for better headroom.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Powertrain Options and Performance

Performance-wise, the Mazda CX-30 is equipped with petrol MHEV engines that produce up to 186 HP, with torque ratings of 240 Nm, allowing it to accelerate from 0-100 km/h in as little as 8.3 seconds. The CX-30 offers a choice of front-wheel drive or all-wheel drive, and its engine options include a 2.0L to a higher capacity 2.5L engine.

On the other hand, the Suzuki S-Cross features both full hybrid and petrol MHEV engines, generating up to 129 HP and a torque of 235 Nm. The acceleration from 0-100 km/h for the S-Cross is rated at 9.5 seconds, showing that it lags behind the CX-30 in terms of raw performance. Nevertheless, the S-Cross has an edge in fuel efficiency, with consumption figures as low as 5.1 L/100 km, compared to the CX-30's 5.7 to 6.5 L/100 km range.

S-Cross @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Transmission and Driving Experience

Both models offer manual and automatic transmission options, catering to various driving preferences. The CX-30 features a more advanced automatic gearbox, enhancing its driving dynamics. In contrast, the S-Cross has an automated manual as one of its transmission options, which may offer a different driving feel. Both vehicles come with front-wheel and all-wheel drive systems, giving consumers the flexibility to choose their level of traction and control.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Interior and Technology

Stepping inside, the Mazda CX-30 offers a premium interior with a focus on driver comfort and usability. High-quality materials and modern technology features, like an intuitive infotainment system and advanced safety systems, enhance the driving experience. The cabin is designed with a sense of openness, complementing the overall sleek design of the vehicle.

The Suzuki S-Cross also provides a well-equipped interior, although it may lack the premium feel that the CX-30 possesses. The S-Cross ensures essential connectivity features are present, but its layout may not be as refined as that of the Mazda. However, Suzuki prioritizes practicality, allowing easy access to storage and functionality.

S-Cross @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Fuel Efficiency and Emission Standards

Fuel efficiency is a significant factor for many buyers. The Mazda CX-30 offers respectable fuel consumption figures, depending on the variant, but the Suzuki S-Cross shines when it comes to lower emissions and a more economical stance. This places the S-Cross in a favorable position for environmentally conscious drivers. With CO2 emissions as low as 116 g/km for the Suzuki, it is clear that Suzuki’s hybrid options cater to modern sustainability demands.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Conclusion: Which Should You Choose?

The Mazda CX-30 and Suzuki S-Cross each have unique strengths catering to different audiences. If you prioritize performance, a premium interior, and a sporty design, the CX-30 stands out as the winner. However, for those looking for superior fuel efficiency, practicality, and a potentially lower cost of ownership, the Suzuki S-Cross represents a compelling alternative.

Ultimately, the best choice depends on individual preferences and driving needs. Both vehicles deliver on promise, making the compact SUV segment a vibrant area filled with options and opportunities for buyers.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

S-Cross @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Suzuki S-Cross has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21800 £, while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25200 £. That’s a price difference of around 3472 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Suzuki S-Cross manages with 5.10 L and is therefore to a small extent more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 0.60 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 has a distinct edge – offering 186 HP compared to 129 HP. That’s roughly 57 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is to a small extent quicker – completing the sprint in 8.30 s, while the Suzuki S-Cross takes 9.50 s. That’s about 1.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-30 performs slight better – reaching 204 km/h, while the Suzuki S-Cross tops out at 195 km/h. The difference is around 9 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-30 pulls barely noticeable stronger with 240 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 5 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Suzuki S-Cross is a bit lighter – 1280 kg compared to 1455 kg. The difference is around 175 kg.

Boot capacity is identical – both offer 430 L of storage.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-30 performs slightly better – up to 1406 L, which is about 176 L more than the Suzuki S-Cross.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-30 to a small extent takes the win – 496 kg compared to 405 kg. That’s a difference of about 91 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda CX-30 proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-30 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £25,200
CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.7 - 6.6 L

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 effortlessly combines sleek design with a sense of adventure, making it an appealing choice for urban explorers and countryside enthusiasts alike. Inside, the cabin is thoughtfully designed, offering both comfort and cutting-edge technology to enhance the driving experience. Its performance on the road is agile, providing a smooth and engaging journey for drivers and passengers.

details

Suzuki S-Cross

4.5 (2)
rate

The Suzuki S-Cross emerges as a versatile crossover, blending urban agility with a rugged presence suited for diverse terrains. Its design combines sleek, modern aesthetics with practicality, offering a spacious interior that comfortably accommodates passengers and cargo for varied journeys. Drivers will appreciate the advanced technology features that enhance both driving pleasure and safety, making the S-Cross a well-rounded option for those seeking reliability and style in a compact SUV.

details
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
S-Cross @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption

Price
25200 - 36800 £
Price
21800 - 33700 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 5.8 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
116 - 131 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
Fuel tank capacity
47 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Curb weight
1280 - 1435 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
430 L
Length
4395 mm
Length
4300 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1785 mm
Height
1540 mm
Height
1580 mm
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Max trunk capacity
1230 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
375 - 405 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automated Manual, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
116 - 129 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.50 s
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Max Speed
175 - 195 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
235 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
85 - 95 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
1373 - 1462 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Suzuki
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.