@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Nissan Juke – Which model is better for everyday use?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Mazda CX-30 or Nissan Juke?

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-30 vs. Nissan Juke: Clash of the Compact SUVs

In the highly competitive world of compact SUVs, two vehicles have managed to stand out for their unique blend of performance, comfort, and design innovation: the Mazda CX-30 and the Nissan Juke. Both are fresh contenders in the 2024 lineup, bringing something distinct to the table for SUV enthusiasts. In this article, we'll delve into their technical specifics and compare their key innovations to see how they stack up against each other.

Juke @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Performance and Power

The Mazda CX-30 offers a robust performance with its petrol MHEV engine available in both manual and automatic transmissions. The engine delivers a substantial power range of up to 186 HP with torque reaching 240 Nm, promising a spirited driving experience. The CX-30 boasts superior acceleration, reaching 0-100 km/h in about 8.3 seconds with a maximum speed of up to 204 km/h, making it a strong contender in its category.

On the other side, the Nissan Juke provides a more modest power output range, with its petrol and full hybrid options delivering up to 143 HP and 200 Nm of torque. Despite having a slower acceleration of up to 10.1 seconds for 0-100 km/h, it’s designed for efficiency and urban utility rather than pure speed, with a maximum speed of 180 km/h.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Fuel Efficiency and Environmental Impact

Efficiency is a critical factor for many SUV buyers today. The Mazda CX-30 offers a respectable fuel consumption range of 5.7 to 6.6 L/100km and CO2 emissions ranging from 129 to 148 g/km, classifying it in the D to E CO2 efficiency classes.

The Nissan Juke scores slightly better in terms of carbon footprint, especially with its full hybrid variant, achieving a low consumption of 4.7 L/100km and CO2 emissions down to 107 g/km, earning it a C efficiency classification. This makes the Juke a compelling option for environmentally conscious drivers.

Juke @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Design and Space

Both SUVs share a sleek five-door design, although they differ in dimensions. The Mazda CX-30 is larger overall, with measurements of 4395 mm in length, 1795 mm in width, and 1540 mm in height. This space allows for a trunk capacity of up to 430 liters, slightly more than the Juke's offering, and is ideal for those needing extra cargo space.

The Nissan Juke is slightly more compact, with a length of 4210 mm and a greater height of 1593 mm, providing a quirkier, more dynamic design that favors tight city navigation. Its trunk varies between 354 to 422 liters, balancing urban agility with utility.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Drivetrain and Handling

Drive preferences are crucial when selecting an SUV. The Mazda CX-30 offers flexibility with both front-wheel and all-wheel drive options, catering to those who enjoy off-road excursions as much as city driving. The all-wheel-drive system provides enhanced stability and control across diverse terrains.

The Nissan Juke, focusing primarily on front-wheel drive, gears more towards city performance and efficiency, providing nimble handling suited for urban lifestyles. Its dual-clutch automatic gearbox in automatic variants ensures smooth transitions and a more engaging drive.

Juke @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Final Verdict

The choice between the Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Juke ultimately comes down to personal preference and intended use. If you seek power, versatility, and a spacious interior, the Mazda CX-30 is an excellent choice, capable of delivering more in terms of performance and off-road capabilities.

However, if your priorities lie in urban efficiency, cutting-edge hybrid technology, and a distinctive design, the Nissan Juke may be your ideal match. Its excellent fuel economy and innovative features make it particularly well-suited for city dwellers looking for style and sustainability.

Both models have made notable strides in technology and design, ensuring they are worthy choices in their segment. Your decision might just rely on whether you prioritize the thrill of driving or the practicality of everyday use.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Nissan Juke has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21400 £, while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25200 £. That’s a price difference of around 3849 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Nissan Juke manages with 4.70 L and is therefore clearly perceptible more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 1 L per 100 km.

Juke @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 has a evident edge – offering 186 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 43 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 8.30 s, while the Nissan Juke takes 10.10 s. That’s about 1.80 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-30 performs slightly better – reaching 204 km/h, while the Nissan Juke tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 24 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-30 pulls a bit stronger with 240 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Nissan Juke is somewhat lighter – 1274 kg compared to 1455 kg. The difference is around 181 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers hardly perceptible more room – 430 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 8 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-30 performs minimal better – up to 1406 L, which is about 101 L more than the Nissan Juke.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-30 to a small extent takes the win – 496 kg compared to 427 kg. That’s a difference of about 69 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Mazda CX-30 shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £25,200
CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.7 - 6.6 L
details

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Nissan Juke

The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.

details
Fahraufnahmen (7) @ Nissan Motor Corporation
Exterieur statisch (2) @ Nissan Motor Corporation
Exterieur statisch (12) @ Nissan Motor Corporation
Interieur (25) @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Juke
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Corsa
VS
In the competitive world of compact crossovers and hatchbacks, the Nissan Juke and Vauxhall Corsa stand as popular choices, each catering to distinct preferences. The Nissan Juke, with its bold and quirky design, offers an elevated driving position and distinctive character, suitable for those …
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Juke
CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
Juke @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Price
21400 - 30100 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
107 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
Fuel tank capacity
46 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Curb weight
1274 - 1405 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
Length
4395 mm
Length
4210 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1800 mm
Height
1540 mm
Height
1593 mm
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Max trunk capacity
1237 - 1305 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
405 - 427 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Max Speed
166 - 180 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
200 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1598 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Nissan

Similar Comparisons

@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Juke
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Mokka
VS
The Nissan Juke is a cheeky, compact crossover with bulging arches, zesty handling and personality to spare, while the Opel Mokka takes a more grown-up route — solid, spacious and quietly efficient with a neater cabin and calmer ride. Pick the Juke if you want to stand out and have fun on twisty …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and SEAT Arona stand out with their unique design philosophies and driving dynamics. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and smooth handling, while the Arona offers agile performance and a sporty character. Ultimately, both models …
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Juke
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota C-HR
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Nissan Juke and Toyota C-HR both offer unique appeal but cater to different driving preferences. The Juke stands out with its distinctive design and agile handling, appealing to those who favor a more spirited drive. Meanwhile, the C-HR impresses with its …
@ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
Lexus LBX
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-5
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 and Mazda CX-5 both showcase the brand's signature blend of style and performance. While the CX-30 offers a more agile driving experience with its smaller footprint, the CX-5 impresses with its spacious interior and powerful engine options. Ultimately, …
@ Kia Corporation
Kia XCeed
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Juke
VS
In the latest showdown between compact crossovers, the Kia XCeed and Nissan Juke take center stage with distinctive features that cater to diverse needs. The Kia XCeed impresses with its sleek design and upscale interior, providing a smooth and comfortable ride that appeals to those who value a …
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.