Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-30 vs Nissan Juke - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (186 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (25200 £ vs 21400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Nissan Juke?
CX-30
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Nissan Juke has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21400 £ , while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3849 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Nissan Juke manages with 4.70 L and is therefore clearly perceptible more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 1 L per 100 km.
Juke
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 has a evident edge – offering 186 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 43 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 8.30 s, while the Nissan Juke takes 10.10 s. That’s about 1.80 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-30 pulls a bit stronger with 240 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
CX-30
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Nissan Juke is somewhat lighter – 1274 kg compared to 1455 kg. The difference is around 181 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers hardly perceptible more room – 430 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 8 L.
When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-30 to a small extent takes the win – 496 kg compared to 427 kg. That’s a difference of about 69 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mazda CX-30 sits well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Juke
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £25,200
Mazda CX-30
Mazda CX-30
5 (1 Reviews)
The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.
details
Nissan Juke
5 (1 Reviews)
The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.
details
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Juke
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25200 - 36800 £
|
Price
21400 - 30100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
|
|
co2
129 - 148 g/km
|
co2
107 - 136 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
46 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
|
Curb weight
1274 - 1405 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
|
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4210 mm
|
|
Width
1795 mm
|
Width
1800 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1593 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1237 - 1305 L
|
|
Payload
458 - 496 kg
|
Payload
405 - 427 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
166 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
Torque
200 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Nissan
|
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?
The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.