@ Mazda Motor Corporation

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Mazda CX-30 vs Skoda Kamiq – Differences & prices compared

Q: How powerful is the Mazda CX-30's engine?

The Mazda CX-30 reaches a peak output of 186 HP, depending on the model.

Q: What is the fuel consumption of the Mazda CX-30 according to the manufacturer?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 5.70 L.

Q: How fast can the Mazda CX-30 go?

Depending on the model, top speed is 204 km/h.

Q: What are the dimensions of the Mazda CX-30?

Overall, the Mazda CX-30 is 4395 mm long, 1795 mm wide and 1540 mm high.

Q: What drive types are available for the Skoda Kamiq?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

Q: How much power does the Skoda Kamiq deliver on the road?

Up to 150 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

Q: What is the fuel consumption of the Skoda Kamiq according to the manufacturer?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 5.30 L.

Q: What maximum speed does the Skoda Kamiq reach?

Depending on the model, top speed is 216 km/h.

Q: What are the dimensions of the Skoda Kamiq?

Length 4241 mm, width 1793 mm, height 1562 mm – those are the dimensions of the Skoda Kamiq.

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Mazda CX-30 or Skoda Kamiq?

scroll down

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Street Style vs. Subtlety

From across the car park the Mazda cuts a low, sculpted silhouette that reads as quietly premium, while the Skoda prefers a crisp, upright stance that signals practicality and purpose. The Mazda’s design feels like a deliberate style statement, the Kamiq’s is more about sensible charm and everyday friendliness. Both have personality, but they speak to different tastes: one chases elegance, the other reliability with a wink.

Kamiq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

How They Earn Their Miles

Behind the wheel the Mazda leans into driver engagement with more planted manners and steering that rewards a bit of enthusiasm, making routine commutes feel less routine. The Skoda trades some of that theatricality for an easy, confidence-inspiring calm that suits longer journeys and city shuttling alike. Neither is a harsh companion; each simply chooses a different mood for the road.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Cabin Life and Everyday Comfort

Step inside the Mazda and you get a cockpit that prioritises feel — soft-touch surfaces, thoughtful detailing and a sense that someone cared about the tactile experience. The Kamiq’s interior is cheerfully pragmatic: layouts are logical, controls are friendly and storage is cleverly packaged for the small annoyances of daily life. Both cabins work well for real families, though they aim at slightly different ideas of comfort.

scroll down

Kamiq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Weekend Packing and Real-World Use

When the weekend calls for kit and chaos, the Mazda shows itself to be a versatile ally with a flexible layout that absorbs backpacks and gear without fuss. The Skoda answers with smart packaging and an intuitive approach to stowing things where you actually want them, which pays off on school runs and supermarket trips. Practicality is a tie in spirit — it’s more about how you live with the car than any single spec sheet number.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Owning One: Costs, Care and Sanity

Cost-conscious buyers will appreciate the Kamiq’s sensible positioning and straightforward ownership feel, while those who value a bit more flair in residuals and appointments may gravitate toward the Mazda’s perceived premium. Both brands have predictable service routines and dealer footprints that make weekend maintenance painless rather than dramatic. Think of the Kamiq as the thriftier, pragmatic partner and the Mazda as the one that feels a touch more special to look after.

Kamiq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Who Should Book a Test Drive?

If you’re a style-conscious driver who wants a small SUV that still rewards spirited cornering and looks the part in every neighbourhood, the Mazda deserves a spin. If you need a sensible, friendly companion for school runs, commuting and packing everything for life without drama, the Skoda is an attractive candidate. The right choice comes down to whether you prioritise poise or practicality in your daily routine.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Turn the Page

Curious which character takes the DriveDuel crown after our full evaluation? Keep reading — the DriveDuel Champion will be revealed afterwards and you won’t want to miss the final verdict.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kamiq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Skoda Kamiq has a to a small extent advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21700 £, while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25200 £. That’s a price difference of around 3523 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kamiq manages with 5.30 L and is therefore hardly perceptible more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 0.40 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 has a to a small extent edge – offering 186 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 36 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kamiq is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 8.10 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 0.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kamiq performs minimal better – reaching 216 km/h, while the Mazda CX-30 tops out at 204 km/h. The difference is around 12 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kamiq pulls minimal stronger with 250 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm difference.

scroll down

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Skoda Kamiq is to a small extent lighter – 1231 kg compared to 1455 kg. The difference is around 224 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers barely noticeable more room – 430 L compared to 400 L. That’s a difference of about 30 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-30 performs minimal better – up to 1406 L, which is about 11 L more than the Skoda Kamiq.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Kamiq minimal takes the win – 539 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 43 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Mazda CX-30 shows itself to be has a very small edge and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £25,200

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-30

Price : 25200 - 36800 £
Body Type : SUV
Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail : Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
Consumption L/100km : 5.7 - 6.6 L
Seats : 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h : 8.3 - 10.3 s
Model Year : 2025
Max Speed : 191 - 204 km/h
Torque : 238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders : 4
Doors : 5
Model : CX-30
Modell : CX-30 2.5 e-SKYACTIV-G 140, CX-30 2.0 e-SKYACTIV-X 186
CO2 Efficiency Class : D, E
Trim Level : Prime-Line, Prime-Line Automatik, Center-Line, Center-Line Automatik, Homura, Homura Automatik, Nagisa, Nagisa Automatik, Exclusive-Line, Exclusive-Line Automatik, Takumi, Takumi Automatik, Center-Line AWD, Center-Line AWD Automatik, Homura AWD, Homura AWD Automatik, Nagisa AWD, Nagisa AWD Automatik, Exclusive-Line AWD, Exclusive-Line AWD Automatik, Takumi AWD, Takumi AWD Automatik
Power kW : 103 - 137 kW
co2 : 129 - 148 g/km
Engine capacity : 1998 - 2488 cm3
Curb weight : 1455 - 1587 kg
Fuel tank capacity : 48 - 51 L
Trunk capacity : 422 - 430 L
Length : 4395 mm
Width : 1795 mm
Height : 1540 mm
Brand : Mazda
Max trunk capacity : 1398 - 1406 L
Payload : 458 - 496 kg

details

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)

The Mazda CX-30 effortlessly combines sleek design with a sense of adventure, making it an appealing choice for urban explorers and countryside enthusiasts alike. Inside, the cabin is thoughtfully designed, offering both comfort and cutting-edge technology to enhance the driving experience. Its performance on the road is agile, providing a smooth and engaging journey for drivers and passengers.

details

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

Skoda Kamiq

5 (2)

The Skoda Kamiq is a neatly packaged city crossover that pairs practical space with unshowy, thoughtful design. It’s easy to live with, economical to run and full of clever details that make daily driving feel intelligently sorted rather than flashy.

details

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Der neue SKODA KAMIQ – Kofferraum_114870

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Top Car Comparisons

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Kamiq

@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

VW Taigo

In the compact crossover ring the Skoda Kamiq plays the sensible everyman—generous boot, clever storage and frugal engines—while the VW Taigo strikes a pose with coupe‑like styling and a slightly livelier, more characterful drive. If you need practical space and everyday value, pick the Kamiq; if …

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Kamiq

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Scala

In the battle of the Skoda Kamiq versus the Skoda Scala, buyers find themselves torn between functionality and style. The Kamiq, with its elevated stance and compact SUV appeal, offers a commanding driving position, making it an ideal choice for urban adventurers. Meanwhile, the Scala impresses …

Mazda CX-30

Skoda Kamiq

@ Mazda Motor Corporation	@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Costs and Consumption
Price 25200 - 36800 £	Price 21700 - 31900 £
Consumption L/100km 5.7 - 6.6 L	Consumption L/100km 5.3 - 5.7 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 129 - 148 g/km	co2 121 - 128 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 48 - 51 L	Fuel tank capacity 50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1455 - 1587 kg	Curb weight 1231 - 1340 kg
Trunk capacity 422 - 430 L	Trunk capacity 400 L
Length 4395 mm	Length 4241 mm
Width 1795 mm	Width 1793 mm
Height 1540 mm	Height 1562 mm
Max trunk capacity 1398 - 1406 L	Max trunk capacity 1395 L
Payload 458 - 496 kg	Payload 439 - 539 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol MHEV	Engine Type Petrol
Transmission Manuel, Automatic	Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 140 - 186 HP	Power HP 95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.3 - 10.3 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.1 - 11 s
Max Speed 191 - 204 km/h	Max Speed 183 - 216 km/h
Torque 238 - 240 Nm	Torque 175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4	Number of Cylinders 3 - 4
Power kW 103 - 137 kW	Power kW 70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity 1998 - 2488 cm3	Engine capacity 999 - 1498 cm3