Compare performance (150 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (21700 £ vs 21400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kamiq or VW T-Cross?
In the growing compact SUV segment, the Skoda Kamiq and VW T-Cross have emerged as formidable contenders. Both models boast practicality, advanced technology, and stylish designs tailored for urban drivers and families alike. In this article, we will delve into a detailed comparison of these two vehicles, assessing their technical features, performance metrics, and innovations.
The Skoda Kamiq offers a range of petrol engines with outputs of 95, 115, and 150 HP, while the VW T-Cross provides a slightly varied power landscape with 95, 116, and 150 HP options. Both vehicles have solid performance metrics, making them suitable for city driving and highway cruising. The Kamiq accelerates from 0-100 km/h in 8.3 to 11 seconds, whereas the T-Cross is marginally behind, taking between 8.4 and 11.2 seconds depending on the engine variant.
When it comes to torque, both models deliver a robust 175 to 250 Nm, translating to similar driving feel and agility. The transmission options include a manual gearbox or a dual-clutch automatic, catering to diverse driving preferences. Front-wheel drive is standard for both, ensuring confident handling in various conditions.
Fuel consumption is a critical consideration for any vehicle buyer. The Kamiq showcases excellent fuel efficiency, with figures ranging from 5.4 to 5.7 L/100km, while the T-Cross presents slightly higher consumption levels at 5.6 to 6 L/100km. CO2 emissions are also comparable, with the Kamiq emitting between 121 and 130 g/km, versus the T-Cross's emissions which range from 127 to 135 g/km. Both cars fall within the CO2 Efficiency Class D, making them environmentally responsible choices within their class.
In terms of size, the Kamiq measures 4241 mm in length, 1793 mm in width, and 1562 mm in height, whereas the T-Cross is slightly shorter at 4127 mm long, 1784 mm wide, and taller at 1573 mm. Despite the dimensions, both vehicles comfortably seat five passengers and offer a spacious interior.
The trunk capacity in the Kamiq stands at an impressive 400 L, while the T-Cross slightly surpasses it with 455 L, contributing to its practicality for families and travelers. Both models feature intelligently designed interiors, providing ample storage options and user-friendly interfaces with infotainment systems that support the latest technologies.
Both Skoda and VW are known for incorporating innovative technologies into their vehicles. The Kamiq features an array of driver assistance systems, including adaptive cruise control, lane assist, and city emergency braking, which enhance safety and driving convenience. Additionally, Skoda's Virtual Cockpit available on higher trims provides a customizable digital dashboard experience.
The T-Cross, meanwhile, impresses with its Gesture Control and a state-of-the-art infotainment system that offers connectivity with both Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. The T-Cross also includes features such as a digital instrument display and numerous driver assistance technologies, ensuring a confident drive on various terrains.
Ultimately, both the Skoda Kamiq and VW T-Cross have their unique strengths. The Kamiq stands out with its spacious trunk and efficiency, making it an ideal option for families and those seeking practicality. On the other hand, the T-Cross offers slightly higher technological innovation and an overall sporty design appeal.
Your final choice may hinge on brand preference, specific feature needs, and driving experience. Regardless of your decision, you can be assured that both vehicles will deliver a delightful driving experience, making them worthy competitors in the compact SUV market.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
VW T-Cross has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21400 £ , while the Skoda Kamiq costs 21700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 317 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kamiq manages with 5.30 L and is therefore minimal more efficient than the VW T-Cross with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.10 L per 100 km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
Both models deliver identical power – 150 HP each.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kamiq is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 8.10 s, while the VW T-Cross takes 8.40 s. That’s about 0.30 s faster.
Both models offer the same torque – 250 Nm.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Skoda Kamiq is hardly perceptible lighter – 1231 kg compared to 1267 kg. The difference is around 36 kg.
In terms of boot space, the VW T-Cross offers a bit more room – 455 L compared to 400 L. That’s a difference of about 55 L.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Kamiq somewhat takes the win – 539 kg compared to 480 kg. That’s a difference of about 59 kg.
The Skoda Kamiq holds a very small edge in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Skoda Kamiq is a neatly packaged city crossover that pairs practical space with unshowy, thoughtful design. It’s easy to live with, economical to run and full of clever details that make daily driving feel intelligently sorted rather than flashy.
details
The VW T-Cross turns everyday practicality into a style statement, offering a roomy-feeling cabin, clever storage and playful design that suits town life and family duties alike. On the road it's composed and relaxed, rewarding buyers who want the raised seating and confident presence of an SUV without the weighty compromises.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21700 - 31900 £
|
Price
21400 - 32000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
121 - 128 g/km
|
co2
124 - 136 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1231 - 1340 kg
|
Curb weight
1267 - 1338 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
400 L
|
Trunk capacity
455 L
|
|
Length
4241 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1793 mm
|
Width
1784 mm
|
|
Height
1562 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1395 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
439 - 539 kg
|
Payload
463 - 480 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
183 - 216 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
VW
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España