@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VS

Skoda Kamiq vs VW T-Cross – Which model is better for everyday use?

Two cars, one duel: Skoda Kamiq meets VW T-Cross.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Kamiq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Kamiq vs. VW T-Cross: A Comprehensive Comparison

In the growing compact SUV segment, the Skoda Kamiq and VW T-Cross have emerged as formidable contenders. Both models boast practicality, advanced technology, and stylish designs tailored for urban drivers and families alike. In this article, we will delve into a detailed comparison of these two vehicles, assessing their technical features, performance metrics, and innovations.

T-Cross @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Engine Specifications and Performance

The Skoda Kamiq offers a range of petrol engines with outputs of 95, 115, and 150 HP, while the VW T-Cross provides a slightly varied power landscape with 95, 116, and 150 HP options. Both vehicles have solid performance metrics, making them suitable for city driving and highway cruising. The Kamiq accelerates from 0-100 km/h in 8.3 to 11 seconds, whereas the T-Cross is marginally behind, taking between 8.4 and 11.2 seconds depending on the engine variant.

When it comes to torque, both models deliver a robust 175 to 250 Nm, translating to similar driving feel and agility. The transmission options include a manual gearbox or a dual-clutch automatic, catering to diverse driving preferences. Front-wheel drive is standard for both, ensuring confident handling in various conditions.

Kamiq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Fuel Efficiency and Emissions

Fuel consumption is a critical consideration for any vehicle buyer. The Kamiq showcases excellent fuel efficiency, with figures ranging from 5.4 to 5.7 L/100km, while the T-Cross presents slightly higher consumption levels at 5.6 to 6 L/100km. CO2 emissions are also comparable, with the Kamiq emitting between 121 and 130 g/km, versus the T-Cross's emissions which range from 127 to 135 g/km. Both cars fall within the CO2 Efficiency Class D, making them environmentally responsible choices within their class.

T-Cross @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Dimensions and Interior Space

In terms of size, the Kamiq measures 4241 mm in length, 1793 mm in width, and 1562 mm in height, whereas the T-Cross is slightly shorter at 4127 mm long, 1784 mm wide, and taller at 1573 mm. Despite the dimensions, both vehicles comfortably seat five passengers and offer a spacious interior.

The trunk capacity in the Kamiq stands at an impressive 400 L, while the T-Cross slightly surpasses it with 455 L, contributing to its practicality for families and travelers. Both models feature intelligently designed interiors, providing ample storage options and user-friendly interfaces with infotainment systems that support the latest technologies.

Kamiq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Innovations and Features

Both Skoda and VW are known for incorporating innovative technologies into their vehicles. The Kamiq features an array of driver assistance systems, including adaptive cruise control, lane assist, and city emergency braking, which enhance safety and driving convenience. Additionally, Skoda's Virtual Cockpit available on higher trims provides a customizable digital dashboard experience.

The T-Cross, meanwhile, impresses with its Gesture Control and a state-of-the-art infotainment system that offers connectivity with both Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. The T-Cross also includes features such as a digital instrument display and numerous driver assistance technologies, ensuring a confident drive on various terrains.

T-Cross @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Conclusion: Which One Should You Choose?

Ultimately, both the Skoda Kamiq and VW T-Cross have their unique strengths. The Kamiq stands out with its spacious trunk and efficiency, making it an ideal option for families and those seeking practicality. On the other hand, the T-Cross offers slightly higher technological innovation and an overall sporty design appeal.

Your final choice may hinge on brand preference, specific feature needs, and driving experience. Regardless of your decision, you can be assured that both vehicles will deliver a delightful driving experience, making them worthy competitors in the compact SUV market.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kamiq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

VW T-Cross has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21100 £, while the Skoda Kamiq costs 21700 £. That’s a price difference of around 634 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kamiq manages with 5.30 L and is therefore minimal more efficient than the VW T-Cross with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.10 L per 100 km.

T-Cross @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

Both models deliver identical power – 150 HP each.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kamiq is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 8.10 s, while the VW T-Cross takes 8.40 s. That’s about 0.30 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kamiq performs barely noticeable better – reaching 216 km/h, while the VW T-Cross tops out at 200 km/h. The difference is around 16 km/h.

Both models offer the same torque – 250 Nm.

Kamiq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Skoda Kamiq is hardly perceptible lighter – 1231 kg compared to 1267 kg. The difference is around 36 kg.

In terms of boot space, the VW T-Cross offers a bit more room – 455 L compared to 400 L. That’s a difference of about 55 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kamiq performs barely noticeable better – up to 1395 L, which is about 114 L more than the VW T-Cross.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Kamiq somewhat takes the win – 539 kg compared to 480 kg. That’s a difference of about 59 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Skoda Kamiq shows itself to be wins solidly and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £21,700
Kamiq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Kamiq

  • Engine Type : Petrol
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 95 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.3 - 5.7 L
details

Skoda Kamiq

5 (2)
rate

The Skoda Kamiq is a neatly packaged city crossover that pairs practical space with unshowy, thoughtful design. It’s easy to live with, economical to run and full of clever details that make daily driving feel intelligently sorted rather than flashy.

details
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ dynamisch_114819 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ dynamisch_114822 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ _114865 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ – Kofferraum_114870 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ Interieur_114688 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

VW T-Cross

4 (1)
rate

The VW T-Cross turns everyday practicality into a style statement, offering a roomy-feeling cabin, clever storage and playful design that suits town life and family duties alike. On the road it's composed and relaxed, rewarding buyers who want the raised seating and confident presence of an SUV without the weighty compromises.

details
DB2021AU01108_medium @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
DB2021AU01109_medium @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
DB2021AU01111_medium @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
DB2021AU01114_medium @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
DB2021AU01120_medium @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
DB2021AU01124_medium @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Top Car Comparisons

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kamiq
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Taigo
VS
In the compact crossover ring the Skoda Kamiq plays the sensible everyman—generous boot, clever storage and frugal engines—while the VW Taigo strikes a pose with coupe‑like styling and a slightly livelier, more characterful drive. If you need practical space and everyday value, pick the Kamiq; if …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kamiq
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Scala
VS
In the battle of the Skoda Kamiq versus the Skoda Scala, buyers find themselves torn between functionality and style. The Kamiq, with its elevated stance and compact SUV appeal, offers a commanding driving position, making it an ideal choice for urban adventurers. Meanwhile, the Scala impresses …
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Cross
Kamiq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
T-Cross @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Costs and Consumption
Price
21700 - 31900 £
Price
21100 - 31500 £
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
121 - 128 g/km
co2
124 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
Fuel tank capacity
40 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1231 - 1340 kg
Curb weight
1267 - 1338 kg
Trunk capacity
400 L
Trunk capacity
455 L
Length
4241 mm
Length
4127 mm
Width
1793 mm
Width
1784 mm
Height
1562 mm
Height
1573 mm
Max trunk capacity
1395 L
Max trunk capacity
1281 L
Payload
439 - 539 kg
Payload
463 - 480 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.3 s
Max Speed
183 - 216 km/h
Max Speed
180 - 200 km/h
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Skoda
Brand
VW

Similar Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
@ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT Arona
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kamiq
VS
Between the sporty, streetwise SEAT Arona and the sensible Škoda Kamiq, the Arona wins hearts with sharper styling and a livelier chassis that makes every corner a little more fun. The Kamiq, however, is the adult in the room — smarter storage, a bigger boot and a calmer cabin, the pragmatic choice …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Fabia
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kamiq
VS
In the latest showdown between the Skoda Fabia and the Skoda Kamiq, both models showcase Skoda's commitment to practicality and style. While the Fabia excels with its compact design and agile handling, making it ideal for urban environments, the Kamiq offers a more rugged stature and higher ride …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kamiq
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kamiq holds its ground against the VW T-Roc by offering excellent value for money without sacrificing essential features. While the T-Roc boasts a more premium interior and sportier styling, the Kamiq impresses with its practicality and spacious cabin, …
@ Citroën / Stellantis Media
Citroen C3 Aircross
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Cross
VS
Citroen C3 Aircross and VW T-Cross go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Cross
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Ford Puma showcases a sporty design and dynamic handling, appealing to those who crave a fun driving experience. Meanwhile, the VW T-Cross emphasizes practicality and interior space, making it a top choice for families seeking comfort on the road. Both …
@ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT Arona
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Cross
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the SEAT Arona and VW T-Cross offer distinct personalities while sharing a similar platform. The Arona embodies a sporty spirit with its dynamic styling and vibrant color options, appealing to a younger audience, while the T-Cross emphasizes practicality …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kamiq
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Skoda Kamiq and Suzuki Vitara stand out in the competitive compact SUV segment, each offering unique strengths. The Kamiq impresses with its refined interior and advanced technology features, catering to those who prioritize comfort and connectivity. Meanwhile, the Vitara boasts robust off-road …
What drive types are available for the Skoda Kamiq?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.