Ford Puma vs Mazda CX-30 - Differences and prices compared

Q: What is the maximum horsepower of the Ford Puma?

Up to 168 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

Q: What is the fuel consumption of the Ford Puma according to the manufacturer?

On average, the Ford Puma consumes 5.40 L.

Q: How much electricity does the Ford Puma use per 100 km?

According to the manufacturer, the Ford Puma requires 13.10 kWh.

Q: What is the Ford Puma’s maximum WLTP range?

The WLTP range is up to 376 km.

Q: What is the battery capacity of the Ford Puma?

The Ford Puma comes with a 43 kWh battery.

Q: What is the top speed of the Ford Puma?

The Ford Puma reaches up to 210 km/h.

Q: What are the Ford Puma’s length, width and height?

Overall, the Ford Puma is 4214 mm long, 1805 mm wide and 1555 mm high.

Q: What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

Q: How powerful is the Mazda CX-30's engine?

The Mazda CX-30 reaches a peak output of 186 HP, depending on the model.

Compare performance (168 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 25200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Mazda CX-30?

scroll down

Puma

The compact-crossover clash

On one side there’s the Ford Puma, the cheeky, sporty compact that wants to turn grocery runs into small adventures; on the other is the Mazda CX-30, a more composed, design-led compact crossover that leans into presence and polish. This is less about class warfare and more about attitude: nimble, playful packaging versus calm, sculpted refinement. Think of it as a sparring match between a sprightly street fox and a poised urbanist — and your driveway is the ring.

CX-30

Personality and presence

The Puma wears its intentions on its sleeve — perky lines, a hint of aggression, and a driving demeanor that prioritises engagement and city agility. The CX-30 plays the long game, with understated elegance, harmonious surfaces and an interior that feels like a small, grown-up refuge. One talks loudly with quick moves, the other whispers premium calm and asks you to notice the details rather than the drama.

scroll down

Puma

Daily life — who handles what better

In everyday use the Puma’s compact footprint and punchy character make it easy to hustle through traffic, park in tight bays and feel connected behind the wheel when the road tightens. The CX-30 rewards time spent on the road with a composed ride, a cabin that cocoons passengers and controls that are arranged for calm, longer stints away from the city. Families, commuters and weekend gear-haulers will find different strengths in each: one is built around agility and usability, the other around comfort and presence.

CX-30

What it says about you

Pick the Puma and you’re signalling that practicality doesn't have to be boring — you want something that’s useful but still a bit cheeky, the car equivalent of a smart-casual outfit. Choose the CX-30 and you’re opting for crafted restraint: tastefully styled, quietly confident and less keen on flash than on lasting refinement. Neither choice is about proving anything dramatic — it’s about what you want your daily companion to feel like when you slide behind the wheel.

Puma

If what matters to you is getting the most from everyday life, consider the Ford Puma

If what matters to you is compact agility, fuss-free packaging and a car that makes errands and tight-city driving feel like less of a chore, the Ford Puma is the one to examine closely. It suits buyers who prioritise sensible use of space, economical running and a lively driving character that keeps the commute interesting. This is the kind of car that rewards practical thinking with a bit of personality for free.

CX-30

If what matters to you is crafted comfort and image, consider the Mazda CX-30

If what matters to you is a refined cabin, a composed on-road manner and a design that says you care about styling and interior quality, the Mazda CX-30 should be near the top of your list. It appeals to those who value comfort on longer journeys, a premium-feeling interior and a presence that feels a touch more grown-up. Still undecided? Scroll on and check the detailed figures to match your instincts with the facts.

Ford Puma

2.9 (10 Reviews)

Mazda CX-30

4.4 (2 Reviews)

You can find all user reviews further down on this page.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Ford Puma has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £ , while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 463 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Puma manages with 5.40 L and is therefore slight more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 0.30 L per 100 km.

CX-30

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 has a minimal edge – offering 186 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 0.90 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls somewhat stronger with 290 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm difference.

scroll down

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Puma is slightly lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1455 kg. The difference is around 139 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers a bit more room – 523 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 93 L.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-30 minimal takes the win – 496 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 27 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma stands out in the key areas in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Ford Puma

Mazda CX-30

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Price

Consumption L/100km

co2

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Power HP

Acceleration 0-100km/h

Torque

Number of Cylinders

Power kW

Engine capacity

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Seats

Curb weight

Trunk capacity

Payload

from about £24,800

Ford Puma

Price : 24800 - 36300 £
Body Type : SUV
Engine Type : Electric, Petrol MHEV
Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail : Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP : 125 - 168 HP
Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption kWh/100km : 13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Electric Range : 361 - 376 km
Battery Capacity : 43 kWh
Seats : 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h : 7.4 - 9.8 s
Model Year : 2025
Max Speed : 160 - 210 km/h
Torque : 170 - 290 Nm
Number of Cylinders : 3
Doors : 5
Model : Puma
Modell : Puma Gen-E, Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid, Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid ST
CO2 Efficiency Class : A, D
Trim Level : Sound Edition, Premium, Titanium, Titanium PowerShift Automatik, ST-Line, ST-Line PowerShift Automatik, ST-Line X, ST-Line X PowerShift Automatik, Sound Edition PowerShift Automatik, PowerShift Automatik
Power kW : 92 - 124 kW
co2 : 0 - 135 g/km
Engine capacity : 999 cm3
Curb weight : 1316 - 1563 kg
Fuel tank capacity : 42 L
Trunk capacity : 456 - 523 L
Length : 4186 - 4226 mm
Width : 1805 mm
Height : 1550 - 1555 mm
Brand : Ford
Max trunk capacity : 1216 - 1283 L
Payload : 367 - 469 kg

details

Ford Puma

2.9 (10 Reviews)

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details

Mazda CX-30

4.4 (2 Reviews)

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details

Reviews Ford Puma

2.9 (10 Reviews)

Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

Show detailed rating

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)

Efficiency / Consumption & Range

Comfort & Interior

Driving Fun / Performance

Technology & Infotainment

Safety

Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use

Value for Money

Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

Show detailed rating

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business

Efficiency / Consumption & Range

Comfort & Interior

Driving Fun / Performance

Technology & Infotainment

Safety

Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use

Value for Money

Top Car Comparisons

Mazda CX-30

Toyota Yaris Cross

In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. …

Mazda CX-30

Nissan Qashqai

In the compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai stand out with their distinctive qualities. The Mazda CX-30 impresses with its sporty styling and superior driving dynamics, making it a joy for those who value performance and aesthetics. In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai offers …

Ford Puma

Mazda CX-30

Costs and Consumption
Price 24800 - 36300 £	Price 25200 - 36800 £
Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 5.9 L	Consumption L/100km 5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km 13.1 - 13.9 kWh	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range 361 - 376 km	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity 43 kWh	Battery Capacity -
co2 0 - 135 g/km	co2 129 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 42 L	Fuel tank capacity -

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors -
Curb weight 1316 - 1563 kg	Curb weight 1455 - 1587 kg
Trunk capacity 456 - 523 L	Trunk capacity 422 - 430 L
Length 4186 - 4226 mm	Length -
Width 1805 mm	Width 1795 mm
Height 1550 - 1555 mm	Height -
Max trunk capacity 1216 - 1283 L	Max trunk capacity -
Payload 367 - 469 kg	Payload 458 - 496 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Electric, Petrol MHEV	Engine Type Petrol MHEV
Transmission Automatic, Manuel	Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic	Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 125 - 168 HP	Power HP 140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.4 - 9.8 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed 160 - 210 km/h	Max Speed -
Torque 170 - 290 Nm	Torque 238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 92 - 124 kW	Power kW 103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity 999 cm3	Engine capacity 1998 - 2488 cm3