Two cars, one duel: Ford Puma meets Mazda CX-30.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out as impressive contenders. Both vehicles offer unique features, innovative technology, and refined driving experiences. In this comparison, we will delve into the technical specifications, performance metrics, and innovations that set these two models apart.
The Ford Puma offers a range of engine options, including petrol MHEV and an electric variant. The power outputs range from 125 to 168 HP, with impressive torque figures of up to 290 Nm. This translates to acceleration times as quick as 7.4 seconds from 0 to 100 km/h, showcasing it as a spirited performer in its class. Furthermore, the Puma boasts fuel consumption figures between 5.4 to 6 L/100km, making it a fuel-efficient option for daily drivers.
In contrast, the Mazda CX-30 is equipped with a petrol MHEV engine that provides up to 186 HP and 240 Nm of torque. While it may not have the same power range as the Puma, it still offers respectable acceleration times, peaking at 8.3 seconds. Fuel consumption for the CX-30 hovers around 5.7 to 6.6 L/100km, which positions it as a competitive alternative in terms of efficiency.
Both vehicles come equipped with manual and automatic transmission options. The Ford Puma is particularly notable for its advanced Dual-Clutch Automatic transmission, which enhances responsiveness and improves driving dynamics. Meanwhile, the CX-30 offers a traditional Automatic Gearbox, ensuring a smooth ride, with the added option of All-Wheel Drive for enhanced traction on challenging terrains.
In terms of drive configurations, the Puma is limited to Front-Wheel Drive, while the CX-30 provides the flexibility of both Front-Wheel and All-Wheel Drive, appealing to a wider audience who may seek off-road capability.
When comparing dimensions, the Ford Puma measures at lengths between 4186 and 4226 mm, while the Mazda CX-30 is slightly longer at 4395 mm. The wider stance of the Puma, at 1805 mm compared to the CX-30’s 1795 mm, may offer a more stable driving experience. Both vehicles come with spacious interiors and can seat up to five passengers comfortably.
In terms of trunk capacity, the Ford Puma leads with options ranging from 456 to 523 liters, allowing for practical storage solutions. The CX-30, although slightly lower with 422 to 430 liters, still provides adequate space for everyday needs.
One of the standout features of the Ford Puma is its incorporation of advanced technology, including the latest Ford SYNC infotainment system that integrates seamlessly with smartphones. It offers various driver-assist technologies designed to enhance safety and comfort.
The Mazda CX-30 does not fall short in the tech department either, featuring the Mazda Connect system which provides a user-friendly interface coupled with premium sound systems. Additionally, its interior design emphasizes quality materials and a driver-focused layout, ensuring a luxurious feel.
Both the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 excel in different areas, catering to diverse preferences among compact SUV buyers. The Puma offers a more extensive power range, better fuel efficiency, and versatile interior space. On the other hand, the CX-30 provides a balance of performance, AWD capability, and upscale interior features.
Ultimately, your choice will come down to specific driving needs and personal preferences. Each model brings its own strengths to the table, ensuring that whether you are looking for practicality in the Ford Puma or the refined luxury of the Mazda CX-30, both vehicles are worthy contenders in the compact SUV segment.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Puma has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25200 £. That’s a price difference of around 463 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Puma manages with 5.40 L and is therefore slight more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 0.30 L per 100 km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 has a minimal edge – offering 186 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 0.90 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs slight better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Mazda CX-30 tops out at 204 km/h. The difference is around 6 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls somewhat stronger with 290 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm difference.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is slightly lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1455 kg. The difference is around 139 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers a bit more room – 523 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 93 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-30 performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1406 L, which is about 123 L more than the Ford Puma.
When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-30 minimal takes the win – 496 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 27 kg.
Overall, the Mazda CX-30 shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
The Ford Puma presents itself as a stylish compact SUV with a distinctive design that combines practicality with a dynamic driving experience. Its sleek lines and sporty aesthetics make it stand out on the road, while the interior offers a comfortable and tech-savvy environment. With an emphasis on efficiency and a smooth drive, the Ford Puma is well-suited for both urban commutes and countryside adventures.
details
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
The Mazda CX-30 effortlessly combines sleek design with a sense of adventure, making it an appealing choice for urban explorers and countryside enthusiasts alike. Inside, the cabin is thoughtfully designed, offering both comfort and cutting-edge technology to enhance the driving experience. Its performance on the road is agile, providing a smooth and engaging journey for drivers and passengers.
details
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
|
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
|
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
25200 - 36800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
129 - 148 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4395 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1795 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1540 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
458 - 496 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mazda
|
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España