In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 captivates with its premium interior and refined performance, appealing to buyers looking for a more upscale experience in this class.
In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out as impressive contenders. Both vehicles offer unique features, innovative technology, and refined driving experiences. In this comparison, we will delve into the technical specifications, performance metrics, and innovations that set these two models apart.
The Ford Puma offers a range of engine options, including petrol MHEV and an electric variant. The power outputs range from 125 to 168 HP, with impressive torque figures of up to 290 Nm. This translates to acceleration times as quick as 7.4 seconds from 0 to 100 km/h, showcasing it as a spirited performer in its class. Furthermore, the Puma boasts fuel consumption figures between 5.4 to 6 L/100km, making it a fuel-efficient option for daily drivers.
In contrast, the Mazda CX-30 is equipped with a petrol MHEV engine that provides up to 186 HP and 240 Nm of torque. While it may not have the same power range as the Puma, it still offers respectable acceleration times, peaking at 8.3 seconds. Fuel consumption for the CX-30 hovers around 5.7 to 6.6 L/100km, which positions it as a competitive alternative in terms of efficiency.
Both vehicles come equipped with manual and automatic transmission options. The Ford Puma is particularly notable for its advanced Dual-Clutch Automatic transmission, which enhances responsiveness and improves driving dynamics. Meanwhile, the CX-30 offers a traditional Automatic Gearbox, ensuring a smooth ride, with the added option of All-Wheel Drive for enhanced traction on challenging terrains.
In terms of drive configurations, the Puma is limited to Front-Wheel Drive, while the CX-30 provides the flexibility of both Front-Wheel and All-Wheel Drive, appealing to a wider audience who may seek off-road capability.
When comparing dimensions, the Ford Puma measures at lengths between 4186 and 4226 mm, while the Mazda CX-30 is slightly longer at 4395 mm. The wider stance of the Puma, at 1805 mm compared to the CX-30’s 1795 mm, may offer a more stable driving experience. Both vehicles come with spacious interiors and can seat up to five passengers comfortably.
In terms of trunk capacity, the Ford Puma leads with options ranging from 456 to 523 liters, allowing for practical storage solutions. The CX-30, although slightly lower with 422 to 430 liters, still provides adequate space for everyday needs.
One of the standout features of the Ford Puma is its incorporation of advanced technology, including the latest Ford SYNC infotainment system that integrates seamlessly with smartphones. It offers various driver-assist technologies designed to enhance safety and comfort.
The Mazda CX-30 does not fall short in the tech department either, featuring the Mazda Connect system which provides a user-friendly interface coupled with premium sound systems. Additionally, its interior design emphasizes quality materials and a driver-focused layout, ensuring a luxurious feel.
Both the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 excel in different areas, catering to diverse preferences among compact SUV buyers. The Puma offers a more extensive power range, better fuel efficiency, and versatile interior space. On the other hand, the CX-30 provides a balance of performance, AWD capability, and upscale interior features.
Ultimately, your choice will come down to specific driving needs and personal preferences. Each model brings its own strengths to the table, ensuring that whether you are looking for practicality in the Ford Puma or the refined luxury of the Mazda CX-30, both vehicles are worthy contenders in the compact SUV segment.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 24800 - 34800
£
|
Price
about 24800 - 36300
£
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6
L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.7
kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
364 - 376
km
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
43
kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
121, 129, 128, 136, 0
g/km
|
co2
129 - 148
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
42
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563
kg
|
Curb weight
1455 - 1587
kg
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523
L
|
Trunk capacity
422 - 430
L
|
Length
4186 - 4226
mm
|
Length
4395
mm
|
Width
1805
mm
|
Width
1795
mm
|
Height
1550 - 1555
mm
|
Height
1540
mm
|
Payload
367 - 469
kg
|
Payload
458 - 496
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
125 - 168
HP
|
Power HP
140 - 186
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3
s
|
Max Speed
160 - 210
km/h
|
Max Speed
191 - 204
km/h
|
Torque
170 - 290
Nm
|
Torque
238 - 240
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Power kW
92 - 124
kW
|
Power kW
103 - 137
kW
|
Engine capacity
999
cm3
|
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488
cm3
|
Top speed
160 - 210
km/h
|
Top speed
191 - 204
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mazda
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.