VS

Ford Puma vs Hyundai Kona comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 204 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 23,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Hyundai Kona?

Ford Puma vs Hyundai Kona: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly more efficient
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly lighter
  • slightly more trunk space
details

Hyundai Kona

4.4 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • moderately more power
  • a bit more efficient
  • slightly more electric range
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Puma

Overview: Ford Puma and Hyundai Kona in one glance

Ford Puma and Hyundai Kona start the comparison as two small SUVs with very different priorities: the Ford Puma VS Hyundai Kona debate is really about sporty character versus everyday space and calm. The Ford Puma positions itself as the more engaging car, with sharp handling and a clever, practical boot solution that suits active owners. The Hyundai Kona leans toward comfort, rear-seat space and straightforward usability that fit small families and commuters. Choosing between the Ford Puma and Hyundai Kona means prioritising feel and fun or cabin room and relaxed daily usability.

Kona

Character and driving dynamics

The Ford Puma is the livelier choice: steering is direct, body control feels tight and it rewards a more involved driving style, so the Puma appeals to those who enjoy cornering and responsive feedback. The Hyundai Kona is calmer and more neutral on the road, delivering predictable steering and a composed ride that sacrifices excitement for ease. The Puma’s liveliness can expose firmer suspension and some engine buzz at low revs, while the Kona masks imperfections with a softer setup and more forgiving balance. For drivers who value engagement the Ford Puma is the clear tilt, whereas those who prefer relaxed, commuter-friendly manners will favour the Hyundai Kona.

Puma

Comfort and long-distance behaviour

On long runs the Hyundai Kona generally feels less tiring: its suspension soaks up motorway seams more gently and rear-seat passengers benefit from noticeably more head- and legroom than in the Ford Puma. The Ford Puma is comfortable up front with supportive seats but transmits sharper hits in sportier trims and can sound a bit thrummy under load, which makes longer stints slightly more fatiguing for sensitive passengers. Both cars are competent on the motorway, but the Kona’s quieter, composed character makes it better suited to relaxed touring while the Puma keeps things brisk and engaged. If long-distance serenity matters more than steering feel, the Hyundai Kona nudges ahead in everyday comfort.

Kona

Practicality and everyday usability

Practical differences are a major decision point: the Ford Puma excels with an unusually usable, washable under-floor storage solution that turns the boot into a real utility space for muddy gear, whereas the Hyundai Kona offers a larger basic luggage area and, in higher trims, flexible split-seat options that help families. The Puma’s cargo cleverness benefits owners with bikes, dog crates or outdoor kit who value clever details over raw litres, while the Kona’s straightforward larger load area and roomier rear bench suit regular passenger duties and longer back-seat occupants. Both are compact enough for city life, but the Puma’s ability to hide bulky items in its MegaBox is a feature-level trump for active lifestyles. If you frequently carry people and wide loads, the Kona is more conventional and accommodating; if you need smart, washable cargo space the Puma stands out.

Puma

Cabin feel, controls and perceived quality

Inside, the Hyundai Kona favours clear ergonomics with physical knobs and a structured layout that feels immediately familiar and less distracting during driving, while the Ford Puma pushes a more modern, screen-focused cockpit that looks sharper but forces more interactions through touch. The Kona tends to feel a little more grown-up in the rear-seat and overall packaging, with a roomier ambience; the Puma’s cabin is sportier up front but uses harder plastics in places that can undermine the premium impression. Infotainment in the Puma is newer and feature-rich, yet the Kona’s straightforward control logic often wins in everyday usability. For buyers who prize tactile controls and a calmer interior feel the Hyundai Kona will feel more composed, while tech-first drivers who don’t mind fewer physical buttons will appreciate the Ford Puma’s up-to-date digital suite.

Kona

Buyer fit: who should pick which car

If you prioritise driving enjoyment, weekend adventures with washable cargo and a cockpit that feels lively, the Ford Puma is more likely to satisfy that profile and reward enthusiastic owners in city and backroad use. If you need rear-seat space, family practicality, a quieter long-distance companion and a no-nonsense control layout, the Hyundai Kona maps better to daily life and multi-person routines. Urban buyers who park and manoeuvre frequently will find both easy, but the Puma’s tighter handling is for those who like to move the car with intent while the Kona delivers stress-free, predictable behaviour. The next technical comparison will show how these real-world differences translate into drivetrain choices, consumption and equipment — choose Puma for engagement, Kona for calm and room.

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Kona
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Hyundai Kona and Toyota Yaris Cross are two leading subcompact crossover SUVs that suit buyers wanting compact size, efficient powertrains and easy city driving. This comparison looks at how the Kona and Yaris Cross differ in driving feel, interior space, practicality and ownership costs so you …
Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In one corner, the Ford Puma brings sporty flair and sharp handling to the small-SUV ring; in the other, the SEAT Arona sticks to sensible practicality and wallet-friendly charm. Which one wins your city commute, weekend escape and resale cheque comes down to whether you want fun on twisty roads or …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Hyundai Kona is marginally cheaper – starting at 23,600 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 343 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Hyundai Kona uses 4.6 L/100km and is a bit more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.8 L/100km.

In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is slightly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 14.6 kWh/100km for the Hyundai Kona. That’s a difference of about 1.6 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Hyundai Kona offers slightly more range – reaching up to 510 km, about 93 km more than the Ford Puma.

Kona

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Hyundai Kona offers moderately more power – delivering 204 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 36 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Hyundai Kona takes 8.1 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers marginally more torque with 290 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is very slightly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,370 kg. The difference is around 54 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers slightly more boot space – 523 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 57 L.

When it comes to payload, the Hyundai Kona carries marginally more – 490 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 21 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Hyundai Kona holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,600
Kona

Hyundai Kona

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 115 - 204 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.6 - 7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 380 - 510 km
details
Ford Puma
Hyundai Kona

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Hyundai Kona

The Hyundai Kona is a compact crossover that pairs bold styling with practical everyday usability, offering a comfortable cabin and intuitive tech for modern drivers. Available in both conventional and electrified versions, Kona brings lively handling and strong value for buyers who want crossover versatility and standout character.

details
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-07_jpg
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-10_jpg
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-02_jpg
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-21_jpg

Reviews Hyundai Kona

4.4 (7 Reviews)
rate
Austin
21 May 2026, 19:30:33

Better fit for is 6'3" people

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
TOTO
20 May 2026, 11:23:42

The Kona is an SUV that delivers, especially in terms of driving comfort. It's noticeably easier to get into and settle into as you get older. Less feisty than the MG4 but slightly more economical.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Hans
23 Apr 2026, 11:02:05

More modern car with much more advanced technology than the S-Cross. The S-Cross is functional, economical and good, but dated.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Gorguet
10 Apr 2026, 07:38:34

Good car overall, but the finish isn't top‑notch — the paint is very fragile and chips at the slightest knock.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
Hyundai Kona
Kia EV3
VS
Choosing between the Hyundai Kona and the Kia EV3 comes down to whether you prefer a well-established compact crossover with a proven track record or a newer electric contender focused on efficiency and modern tech. I’ll walk you through how they compare across range, practicality, driving feel and …
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
Ford Puma
CUPRA Raval
VS
Comparing the Ford Puma and the Cupra Raval pits a practical, compact crossover known for clever packaging and everyday efficiency against a bolder, sport-oriented compact that emphasizes sharper handling, tech and aggressive styling. Your choice comes down to whether you prioritise comfort, …
Hyundai Kona
Kia Niro
VS
The Hyundai Kona and Kia Niro are two popular compact crossovers that appeal to buyers deciding between sportier looks and practical efficiency. Though they share similar underpinnings and offer hybrid and electric options, they differ in driving dynamics, interior space, and feature priorities — …
Hyundai Kona
Kia EV2
VS
Here’s a head-to-head look at the Hyundai Kona and the Kia EV2, two compact crossovers that aim to deliver efficient electric driving with practical everyday usability. I’ll compare the essentials—range, charging, interior space, driving feel and running costs—so you can pick the one that fits your …
Hyundai Bayon
Hyundai Kona
VS
The Hyundai Bayon and Hyundai Kona are closely related compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want a small SUV, but they take different approaches to size, style and capability. This comparison will help you decide whether the Bayon’s city-focused practicality and value or the Kona’s wider engine …
Ford Puma
Hyundai Kona

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
23,600 - 41,900 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
380 - 510 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
0 - 163 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,370 - 1,773 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
466 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,825 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
420 - 490 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
115 - 204 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
85 - 150 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E, F, A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Hyundai
What drivetrain options does the Ford Puma have?

The Ford Puma is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.