@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Hyundai Motor Company
VS

Ford Puma vs Hyundai Kona – Which model is better for everyday use?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Ford Puma or Hyundai Kona?

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

The compact SUV market has exploded in popularity, and two noteworthy contenders in this space are the Ford Puma and the Hyundai Kona. Both offer modern aesthetics, advanced technology, and a variety of powertrain options, making it crucial for potential buyers to understand their differences. This article aims to provide an in-depth comparison covering technical aspects, innovation, and performance characteristics of these two popular models.

Kona @ Hyundai Motor Company

Engine and Performance

The Ford Puma offers a range of engine choices with an emphasis on efficiency. Its petrol line-up includes a mild-hybrid version, providing options such as 125 HP and more powerful variants up to 168 HP. The Puma is also available with an electric powertrain that allows for an electric range of up to 376 km, making it a strong option for environmentally conscious consumers. The 0-100 km/h acceleration times for the Puma range from 7.4 seconds for the quickest variant to 9.8 seconds.

In contrast, the Hyundai Kona features a diverse lineup that includes petrol engines, hybrids, and fully electric variants. The most powerful Kona can deliver up to 218 HP with an impressive 0-100 km/h time of just 7.8 seconds. The Kona electric boasts a remarkable range of up to 514 km, appealing to those who prioritize electric mobility. The combination of the Kona’s all-wheel-drive capability in certain variants also offers enhanced grip and driving security.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Fuel Economy

The Ford Puma scores commendably in fuel efficiency, with consumption figures ranging from 5.4 to 6 L/100 km depending on the variant. The electric version consumes about 13.1 kWh/100 km, making it competitive in its segment.

The Hyundai Kona, however, takes a slightly different approach with its efficiency. Its petrol variants consume between 4.5 and 6.7 L/100 km, while the electric variants see consumption figures as high as 16.8 kWh/100 km. Despite this, the Kona shines with its hybrid options, effectively balancing power and fuel economy.

Kona @ Hyundai Motor Company

Interior and Comfort

When it comes to interior space and comfort, both the Ford Puma and Hyundai Kona cater well to families. The Puma features a trunk capacity of 456 to 523 liters, providing ample storage for any adventure. Additionally, the interior design is sleek and equipped with modern technology, enhancing the driving experience.

The Hyundai Kona offers a trunk capacity of 466 liters, presenting a comparable space for cargo. However, the Kona excels with its layout and modern tech features, which include a user-friendly infotainment system and a suite of driver-assistance technologies. Both SUVs comfortably seat five passengers, making them practical choices for urban commuting or weekend getaways.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Safety and Innovations

Safety is a top priority for both manufacturers. The Ford Puma comes equipped with a broad array of features, including pre-collision assist and adaptive cruise control, which contribute to its solid safety credentials.

Similarly, the Hyundai Kona does not fall short in this area, boasting features such as autonomous emergency braking and lane-keeping assist. Both vehicles received respectable ratings from safety organizations, ensuring peace of mind for buyers.

Kona @ Hyundai Motor Company

Final Thoughts

Choosing between the Ford Puma and Hyundai Kona ultimately boils down to individual preferences and requirements. The Puma tends to emphasize a sportier drive with its mild-hybrid options, while the Kona presents a more versatile lineup catering to a variety of consumers, particularly those seeking electric and hybrid technologies.

In summary, both the Ford Puma and Hyundai Kona represent the best of what compact SUVs have to offer, combining style, performance, and technology in a way that appeals to a wide range of drivers. Whatever your choice, you can be assured that both models will deliver an engaging driving experience and a host of modern conveniences.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Hyundai Kona has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23100 £, while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £. That’s a price difference of around 1714 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Hyundai Kona manages with 4.60 L and is therefore to a small extent more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.80 L per 100 km.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s a bit more efficient than the Hyundai Kona with 14.60 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.50 kWh.

As for range, the Hyundai Kona performs clearly perceptible better – achieving up to 514 km, about 138 km more than the Ford Puma.

Kona @ Hyundai Motor Company

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Hyundai Kona has a noticeable edge – offering 218 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 50 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Hyundai Kona takes 7.80 s. That’s about 0.40 s faster.

There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 210 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls hardly perceptible stronger with 290 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Puma is minimal lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1370 kg. The difference is around 54 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers somewhat more room – 523 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 57 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Hyundai Kona performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1300 L, which is about 17 L more than the Ford Puma.

When it comes to payload, Hyundai Kona hardly perceptible takes the win – 490 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 21 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Hyundai Kona shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £23,100
Kona @ Hyundai Motor Company

Hyundai Kona

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 218 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.6 - 7 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.6 - 16.8 kWh
  • Electric Range : 377 - 514 km
details

Ford Puma

5 (1)
rate

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Hyundai Kona

5 (1)
rate

The Hyundai Kona wears its personality on the outside with bold styling and sprightly handling that turns city driving into something a little more fun than a commute. It blends practical space, modern tech and sensible running costs into a compact, stylish package — a smart pick if you want flair without paying luxury prices.

details
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-07_jpg @ Hyundai Motor Company
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-10_jpg @ Hyundai Motor Company
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-02_jpg @ Hyundai Motor Company
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-21_jpg @ Hyundai Motor Company

Top Car Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
MG MG4
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered compact crossover that feels taut and practical — with Ford's lively chassis, a roomy MegaBox boot and mild‑hybrid frugality — the Puma is the small SUV to live with. But if you're ready to go electric without blowing the budget, the MG4 serves up surprising …
Ford Puma
Hyundai Kona
Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Kona @ Hyundai Motor Company

Costs and Consumption
Price
24800 - 36300 £
Price
23100 - 41600 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.8 kWh
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Electric Range
377 - 514 km
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
Battery Capacity
1.3 - 65.4 kWh
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
0 - 163 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
Fuel tank capacity
38 - 47 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Curb weight
1370 - 1773 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
466 L
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Length
4350 - 4385 mm
Width
1805 mm
Width
1825 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Height
1580 - 1585 mm
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Max trunk capacity
1300 L
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
420 - 490 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
115 - 218 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 - 11.9 s
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
162 - 210 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
85 - 160 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
998 - 1598 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C, E, F
Brand
Ford
Brand
Hyundai

Similar Comparisons

@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Kona
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Hyundai Kona serves up sharper handling, eye-catching design and punchier tech for drivers who want a bit of fun with their commute, while the Toyota Yaris Cross favours sensible virtues — class-leading hybrid economy, solid build and a more practical cabin for real-world family life. If you …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Renault Group Media
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma and the Renault 5 both offer unique appeals in the compact car segment. The Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and dynamic driving experience, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a blend of style and performance. In contrast, the Renault 5 charms with its iconic …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Bayon
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Kona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Hyundai Bayon and Hyundai Kona each offer distinct advantages tailored to different driver preferences. The Bayon impresses with its sleek urban design and efficient use of space, making it an ideal choice for city dwellers. Meanwhile, the Kona stands …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Frontera
VS
The Ford Puma feels like a sprightly urban fox — compact, efficient and packed with modern tech, perfect if you want lively handling and low running costs for daily driving. The Opel Frontera is all rugged charm and chunky presence, built for dirt tracks and weekend hauls rather than tight city …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Focus
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
VS
In the realm of compact vehicles, the Ford Focus and Ford Puma present two compelling choices, each with its own unique appeal. The Focus is celebrated for its spacious interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it an ideal option for families and enthusiasts alike. On the other hand, the Puma …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
BYD Dolphin Surf
VS
The Ford Puma and the BYD Dolphin went head-to-head in a thrilling comparison, showcasing unique strengths for diverse drivers. The Ford Puma offers a smooth blend of performance and style with its more traditional compact SUV design, appealing to those who value a sporty driving experience. …
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.