Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Hyundai Kona - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (168 HP vs 218 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 23100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Hyundai Kona?
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Hyundai Kona has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23100 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1714 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Hyundai Kona manages with 4.60 L and is therefore to a small extent more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.80 L per 100 km.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s a bit more efficient than the Hyundai Kona with 14.60 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.50 kWh.
As for electric range, the Hyundai Kona performs clearly perceptible better – achieving up to 514 km, about 138 km more than the Ford Puma.
Kona
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Hyundai Kona has a noticeable edge – offering 218 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 50 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Hyundai Kona takes 7.80 s. That’s about 0.40 s faster.
There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 210 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls hardly perceptible stronger with 290 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is minimal lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1370 kg. The difference is around 54 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers somewhat more room – 523 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 57 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Hyundai Kona performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1300 L, which is about 17 L more than the Ford Puma.
When it comes to payload, Hyundai Kona hardly perceptible takes the win – 490 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 21 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Hyundai Kona shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £23,100
Hyundai Kona
Ford Puma
Hyundai Kona
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
2 (7 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Hyundai Kona
5 (1 Reviews)
The Hyundai Kona wears its personality on the outside with bold styling and sprightly handling that turns city driving into something a little more fun than a commute. It blends practical space, modern tech and sensible running costs into a compact, stylish package — a smart pick if you want flair without paying luxury prices.
details
Ford Puma
Hyundai Kona
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
23100 - 41600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.8 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
377 - 514 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
1.3 - 65.4 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 - 163 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
38 - 47 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1370 - 1773 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
466 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4350 - 4385 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1825 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1580 - 1585 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1300 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
420 - 490 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 218 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 - 11.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
162 - 210 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 160 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C, E, F
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Hyundai
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.