@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VS

Ford Puma vs VW ID.3 – Differences & prices compared

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or VW ID.3?

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

City flirt or silent boulevard cruiser?

The Ford Puma wears its personality on its sleeve — a compact crossover with a cheeky stance that feels at home threading through tight urban streets and catching admiring glances at the lights. The VW ID.3, by contrast, is the portrait of composed modernity: quiet, purposeful and designed to dissolve the bustle rather than compete with it. Choosing between them is as much about attitude as it is about need — one invites you to play, the other to unwind. Both have urban virtues, just packaged for different tastes.

ID.3 @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Behind the wheel: grin or zen?

Drive the Puma and you notice a playful chassis that rewards quick inputs and makes everyday cornering feel engaging rather than routine, with a steering feel that keeps you involved. The ID.3 offers a far more serene experience, trading overt thrills for a smooth, linear delivery and a calming sense of control that’s ideal for covering ground without fuss. In short, the Puma excites your inner driver while the ID.3 soothes it — two very different driving therapies. Which one resonates depends on whether you want to be entertained or simply arrive refreshed.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Practicalities that actually matter

For shoppers who value flexible packing and a raised driving position, the Puma’s packaging feels intentionally useful and easy to live with day-to-day, turning grocery runs and weekend kit-hauls into low-stress affairs. The ID.3 leverages clever electric-era packaging to deliver a surprisingly airy cabin and comfortable rear seating that favors passengers and longer stints. Both cabins are thoughtfully arranged for everyday usability, but they prioritise different kinds of practicality: adaptable cargo and visibility versus passenger comfort and cabin space. Your routine will tip the balance more than raw capacity numbers ever could.

ID.3 @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Touchpoints: who uses the buttons and how it feels

Inside the Puma you get a friendly mix of tactile switches and sporty cues that make the cockpit feel familiar and immediate, with materials and details aimed at making each interaction pleasant rather than clinical. The ID.3 adopts a minimalist, tech-forward layout where screens and clean surfaces dominate, delivering a modern, calming ambience that some will find elegant and others a touch distant. Both approaches work, but they send different signals about who the car is for — one more analogue and approachable, the other forward-thinking and minimalist. Ergonomics and personal taste will quickly sort which interior feels like home.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Fueling, charging and everyday ownership

Owning either car comes with its own practical rhythm: one rewards you with the familiarity and flexibility of quick refuelling and a lower entry cost of purchase, while the other pays dividends in day-to-day energy cost and the convenience of home-based recharging for many owners. Maintenance rhythms and long-term running expectations differ too, and practical buyers should think about where they live and how they drive before choosing. Both offer sensible ownership stories, but the best financial fit depends on your lifestyle rather than headline figures. Read the fine print on local incentives and infrastructure to make the choice truly yours.

ID.3 @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Who will love which car?

Commuters wanting quiet, low-fuss mile-eating and a modern cabin will likely be drawn to the ID.3, while buyers after a confident, slightly cheeky crossover with flexible daily usability will find the Puma hard to resist. Families seeking versatile packing and an elevated sense of control may lean to the Puma’s practical nature, whereas style-conscious, tech-forward buyers who prioritise a calm cabin and modern silhouette will see the ID.3 as a more natural fit. Ultimately, it’s a question of lifestyle — pick the character that matches your day-to-day priorities.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Turn the page and pick your favourite

Both cars bring strong, honest propositions to the table: one lively and engaging, the other calm and forward-looking, and neither is a one-size-fits-all answer. If you’ve got a clear image of how your days look, the right choice will feel obvious; if not, keep reading for the side-by-side verdict. Stay with us — the DriveDuel Champion will be revealed afterwards and it might just change how you see both of them.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ID.3 @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Ford Puma has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the VW ID.3 costs 28600 £. That’s a price difference of around 3797 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s slightly more efficient than the VW ID.3 with 14.50 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.40 kWh.

As for range, the VW ID.3 performs distinct better – achieving up to 605 km, about 229 km more than the Ford Puma.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the VW ID.3 has a significantly edge – offering 326 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 158 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW ID.3 is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 5.70 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 1.70 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs barely noticeable better – reaching 210 km/h, while the VW ID.3 tops out at 200 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: VW ID.3 pulls clearly stronger with 545 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 255 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Puma is clearly perceptible lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1787 kg. The difference is around 471 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers distinct more room – 523 L compared to 385 L. That’s a difference of about 138 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs minimal better – up to 1283 L, which is about 16 L more than the VW ID.3.

When it comes to payload, VW ID.3 slight takes the win – 473 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 4 kg.

Who wins the race?

The VW ID.3 proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
VW ID.3 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £28,600
ID.3 @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

VW ID.3

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 170 - 326 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.5 - 15.8 kWh
  • Electric Range : 383 - 605 km

Ford Puma

5 (1)
rate

The Ford Puma presents itself as a stylish compact SUV with a distinctive design that combines practicality with a dynamic driving experience. Its sleek lines and sporty aesthetics make it stand out on the road, while the interior offers a comfortable and tech-savvy environment. With an emphasis on efficiency and a smooth drive, the Ford Puma is well-suited for both urban commutes and countryside adventures.

details

VW ID.3

5 (2)
rate

The VW ID.3 represents Volkswagen's entry into the world of electric vehicles, offering a modern design that combines functionality with sustainability. Inside, you'll find a spacious and tech-forward interior, providing a comfortable driving experience while maintaining a focus on environmentally friendly materials. The ID.3's performance delivers a smooth and responsive feel on the road, making it a strong contender in the growing electric car market.

details
Ford Puma
VW ID.3
Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
ID.3 @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Costs and Consumption

Price
24800 - 36300 £
Price
28600 - 49300 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
14.5 - 15.8 kWh
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Electric Range
383 - 605 km
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
Battery Capacity
52 - 79 kWh
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Curb weight
1787 - 1993 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
385 L
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Length
4264 mm
Width
1805 mm
Width
1809 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Height
1564 mm
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Max trunk capacity
1267 L
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
437 - 473 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
170 - 326 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 8.2 s
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
160 - 200 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
310 - 545 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
125 - 240 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
VW
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.