Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs VW ID.3 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (168 HP vs 326 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 28600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or VW ID.3?
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Puma has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £ , while the VW ID.3 costs 28600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3797 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s slightly more efficient than the VW ID.3 with 14.50 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.40 kWh.
As for electric range, the VW ID.3 performs distinct better – achieving up to 605 km, about 229 km more than the Ford Puma.
ID.3
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the VW ID.3 has a significantly edge – offering 326 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 158 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW ID.3 is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 5.70 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 1.70 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs barely noticeable better – reaching 210 km/h, while the VW ID.3 tops out at 200 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: VW ID.3 pulls clearly stronger with 545 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 255 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is clearly perceptible lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1787 kg. The difference is around 471 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers distinct more room – 523 L compared to 385 L. That’s a difference of about 138 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs minimal better – up to 1283 L, which is about 16 L more than the VW ID.3.
When it comes to payload, VW ID.3 slight takes the win – 473 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 4 kg.
Who wins the race?
The VW ID.3 proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
VW ID.3 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £28,600
VW ID.3
Ford Puma
VW ID.3
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
2 (7 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
VW ID.3
5 (2 Reviews)
The VW ID.3 is a crisply styled electric hatch that masks serious practicality behind a friendly, modern face, making city runs and longer trips pleasantly fuss free. For buyers seeking a sensible, well-equipped EV that doesn't take itself too seriously, the ID.3 strikes a neat balance of comfort, tech and everyday usability with a cheeky smile.
details
Ford Puma
VW ID.3
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
28600 - 49300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.5 - 15.8 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
383 - 605 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
52 - 79 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1787 - 1993 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
385 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4264 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1809 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1564 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1267 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
437 - 473 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
170 - 326 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 8.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 200 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
310 - 545 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
125 - 240 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
VW
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.