Compare performance (168 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 20700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or SEAT Arona?
When it comes to the burgeoning compact SUV market, two models are making significant waves: the Ford Puma and the SEAT Arona. Both vehicles boast modern designs, efficient engines, and a host of cutting-edge technologies, making them worthy contenders in their segment. This article provides a comprehensive comparison of these two popular models, focusing on technical specifications, performance metrics, and innovative features.
The Ford Puma offers a range of options that cater to different preferences and driving styles. With engine choices including petrol MHEV (Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle) variants, the Puma provides power outputs that range from 125 to 168 HP. Its acceleration capabilities also impress, with times as low as 7.4 seconds for the 0-100 km/h sprint. In terms of efficiency, the Puma showcases a remarkable fuel consumption range of 5.4 to 6 L/100 km, which is competitive in its class.
On the other hand, the SEAT Arona is powered exclusively by petrol engines, with power outputs ranging from 95 to 150 HP. It demonstrates solid performance, reaching 0-100 km/h in as low as 8.4 seconds with the more powerful engine option. The Arona's fuel consumption is comparable to the Puma, with values ranging from 5.4 to 5.6 L/100 km. Both models utilize front-wheel drive layouts, although the Puma’s hybrid variant may offer additional efficiency benefits in certain driving conditions.
In terms of size, the Ford Puma measures between 4186 mm to 4226 mm in length, 1805 mm wide, and has a height of 1550 to 1555 mm. It provides ample trunk capacity ranging from 456 to 523 liters, making it practical for everyday use or family outings.
The SEAT Arona, while slightly smaller with a length of 4153 mm and a width of 1780 mm, still manages to offer competitive space. Its trunk capacity sits at a respectable 400 liters. While it may not surpass the Puma in cargo volume, the Arona’s compact size can be advantageous for city driving and parking.
Ford has incorporated multiple technological advancements into the Puma, including an advanced infotainment system that supports Android Auto and Apple CarPlay. Additionally, its hybrid powertrain features regenerative braking technology, which enhances energy efficiency. The Puma also boasts a 43 kWh battery on its electric variants, allowing for an electric range of up to 376 km.
SEAT, on the other hand, emphasizes connectivity and driver assistance systems in the Arona. It features a user-friendly infotainment system, along with multiple connectivity options. While SEAT may not offer a hybrid variant, the Arona is designed to be light and nimble, affording a dynamic driving experience.
The driving experience in both vehicles is designed to be engaging and comfortable. The Ford Puma is equipped with features like adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assistance, and enhanced suspension that caters to both spirited drives and daily commutes. It is built with a focus on comfort, promising a smooth ride regardless of road conditions.
The SEAT Arona offers a similarly inviting driving experience, with responsive steering and a well-tuned suspension system. The cabin benefits from quality materials and ergonomic design, ensuring passengers enjoy a comfortable journey. While it leans towards a sporty feel, the Arona does not compromise on comfort.
In conclusion, the Ford Puma and SEAT Arona each offer unique advantages and appeal to different types of drivers. The Puma stands out with its hybrid offerings and superior cargo space, while the Arona shines in its dynamic driving experience and connectivity features. Ultimately, the choice between these two compact SUVs will depend on individual preferences regarding efficiency, space, and driving style. Regardless, both models are illustrious representations of their brands, setting high standards in the competitive compact SUV market.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
SEAT Arona has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 20700 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4071 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: SEAT Arona manages with 5.30 L and is therefore barely noticeable more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.10 L per 100 km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a to a small extent edge – offering 168 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the SEAT Arona takes 8.30 s. That’s about 0.90 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls somewhat stronger with 290 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm difference.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, SEAT Arona is to a small extent lighter – 1188 kg compared to 1316 kg. The difference is around 128 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers to a small extent more room – 456 L compared to 400 L. That’s a difference of about 56 L.
When it comes to payload, SEAT Arona slightly takes the win – 522 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 53 kg.
The Ford Puma leads convincingly in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
The SEAT Arona is a cheeky urban crossover that mixes sharp styling with sensible practicality, making it an appealing choice for buyers who want personality without fuss. It’s zippy in traffic, comfortable enough for daily driving, and brings enough character to make routine journeys feel a little more fun.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
20700 - 30500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
120 - 132 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1188 - 1268 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 L
|
Trunk capacity
400 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1780 mm
|
|
Height
1550 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
502 - 522 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 11.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
190 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025 - 2026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
SEAT
|
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España