@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
VS

Ford Puma vs SEAT Arona – Which model is better for everyday use?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Ford Puma or SEAT Arona fits your lifestyle better.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

When it comes to the burgeoning compact SUV market, two models are making significant waves: the Ford Puma and the SEAT Arona. Both vehicles boast modern designs, efficient engines, and a host of cutting-edge technologies, making them worthy contenders in their segment. This article provides a comprehensive comparison of these two popular models, focusing on technical specifications, performance metrics, and innovative features.

Arona @ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center

Powertrains and Performance

The Ford Puma offers a range of options that cater to different preferences and driving styles. With engine choices including petrol MHEV (Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle) variants, the Puma provides power outputs that range from 125 to 168 HP. Its acceleration capabilities also impress, with times as low as 7.4 seconds for the 0-100 km/h sprint. In terms of efficiency, the Puma showcases a remarkable fuel consumption range of 5.4 to 6 L/100 km, which is competitive in its class.

On the other hand, the SEAT Arona is powered exclusively by petrol engines, with power outputs ranging from 95 to 150 HP. It demonstrates solid performance, reaching 0-100 km/h in as low as 8.4 seconds with the more powerful engine option. The Arona's fuel consumption is comparable to the Puma, with values ranging from 5.4 to 5.6 L/100 km. Both models utilize front-wheel drive layouts, although the Puma’s hybrid variant may offer additional efficiency benefits in certain driving conditions.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Dimensions and Cargo Space

In terms of size, the Ford Puma measures between 4186 mm to 4226 mm in length, 1805 mm wide, and has a height of 1550 to 1555 mm. It provides ample trunk capacity ranging from 456 to 523 liters, making it practical for everyday use or family outings.

The SEAT Arona, while slightly smaller with a length of 4153 mm and a width of 1780 mm, still manages to offer competitive space. Its trunk capacity sits at a respectable 400 liters. While it may not surpass the Puma in cargo volume, the Arona’s compact size can be advantageous for city driving and parking.

Arona @ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center

Technological Innovations

Ford has incorporated multiple technological advancements into the Puma, including an advanced infotainment system that supports Android Auto and Apple CarPlay. Additionally, its hybrid powertrain features regenerative braking technology, which enhances energy efficiency. The Puma also boasts a 43 kWh battery on its electric variants, allowing for an electric range of up to 376 km.

SEAT, on the other hand, emphasizes connectivity and driver assistance systems in the Arona. It features a user-friendly infotainment system, along with multiple connectivity options. While SEAT may not offer a hybrid variant, the Arona is designed to be light and nimble, affording a dynamic driving experience.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Driving Experience and Comfort

The driving experience in both vehicles is designed to be engaging and comfortable. The Ford Puma is equipped with features like adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assistance, and enhanced suspension that caters to both spirited drives and daily commutes. It is built with a focus on comfort, promising a smooth ride regardless of road conditions.

The SEAT Arona offers a similarly inviting driving experience, with responsive steering and a well-tuned suspension system. The cabin benefits from quality materials and ergonomic design, ensuring passengers enjoy a comfortable journey. While it leans towards a sporty feel, the Arona does not compromise on comfort.

Arona @ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Ford Puma and SEAT Arona each offer unique advantages and appeal to different types of drivers. The Puma stands out with its hybrid offerings and superior cargo space, while the Arona shines in its dynamic driving experience and connectivity features. Ultimately, the choice between these two compact SUVs will depend on individual preferences regarding efficiency, space, and driving style. Regardless, both models are illustrious representations of their brands, setting high standards in the competitive compact SUV market.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

SEAT Arona has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 19300 £, while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £. That’s a price difference of around 5469 £.

Both cars consume an average of 5.40 L per 100 km – no difference here.

Arona @ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a to a small extent edge – offering 168 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the SEAT Arona takes 8.40 s. That’s about 1 s faster.

There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 210 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls somewhat stronger with 290 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, SEAT Arona is to a small extent lighter – 1188 kg compared to 1316 kg. The difference is around 128 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers distinct more room – 523 L compared to 400 L. That’s a difference of about 123 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs minimal better – up to 1283 L, which is about 3 L more than the SEAT Arona.

When it comes to payload, SEAT Arona slightly takes the win – 522 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 53 kg.

Who wins the race?

The SEAT Arona proves to be shows small but notable strengths and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
SEAT Arona is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £19,300
Arona @ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center

SEAT Arona

  • Engine Type : Petrol
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 95 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 5.6 L
details

Ford Puma

5 (1)
rate

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

SEAT Arona

The SEAT Arona is a cheeky urban crossover that mixes sharp styling with sensible practicality, making it an appealing choice for buyers who want personality without fuss. It’s zippy in traffic, comfortable enough for daily driving, and brings enough character to make routine journeys feel a little more fun.

details
seat-arona-One-car-countless-possibilities_07_HQ @ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
seat-arona-One-car-countless-possibilities_06_HQ @ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
seat-arona-One-car-countless-possibilities_04_HQ @ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
seat-arona-One-car-countless-possibilities_02_HQ @ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center

Top Car Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
MG MG4
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered compact crossover that feels taut and practical — with Ford's lively chassis, a roomy MegaBox boot and mild‑hybrid frugality — the Puma is the small SUV to live with. But if you're ready to go electric without blowing the budget, the MG4 serves up surprising …
Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Arona @ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center

Costs and Consumption
Price
24800 - 36300 £
Price
19300 - 29300 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
122 - 128 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
Fuel tank capacity
40 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Curb weight
1188 - 1268 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
400 L
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Length
4153 mm
Width
1805 mm
Width
1780 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Height
1537 mm
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Max trunk capacity
1280 L
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
502 - 522 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.3 s
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
182 - 210 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
Brand
Ford
Brand
SEAT

Similar Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Renault Group Media
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Frontera
VS
The Ford Puma feels like a sprightly urban fox — compact, efficient and packed with modern tech, perfect if you want lively handling and low running costs for daily driving. The Opel Frontera is all rugged charm and chunky presence, built for dirt tracks and weekend hauls rather than tight city …
@ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT Arona
@ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT Ibiza
VS
Think of the SEAT Arona as the chunky crossover that gives you a higher view of the road, more boot space and practical family-friendly packaging, while the SEAT Ibiza is the sharper, lighter hatch that’s more fun to hustle through town and returns better fuel economy. Pick the Arona if you want …
@ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT Arona
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kamiq
VS
Between the sporty, streetwise SEAT Arona and the sensible Škoda Kamiq, the Arona wins hearts with sharper styling and a livelier chassis that makes every corner a little more fun. The Kamiq, however, is the adult in the room — smarter storage, a bigger boot and a calmer cabin, the pragmatic choice …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Golf
VS
In the competitive arena of compact cars, the Ford Puma and VW Golf stand out for their exceptional blend of style and performance. The Puma impresses with its sporty design and agile handling, while the Golf continues to be a benchmark for interior quality and tech features. Ultimately, choosing …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Focus
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
VS
In the realm of compact vehicles, the Ford Focus and Ford Puma present two compelling choices, each with its own unique appeal. The Focus is celebrated for its spacious interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it an ideal option for families and enthusiasts alike. On the other hand, the Puma …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
BYD Dolphin Surf
VS
The Ford Puma and the BYD Dolphin went head-to-head in a thrilling comparison, showcasing unique strengths for diverse drivers. The Ford Puma offers a smooth blend of performance and style with its more traditional compact SUV design, appealing to those who value a sporty driving experience. …
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.