VS

Ford Puma vs SEAT Arona comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 20,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or SEAT Arona?

Ford Puma vs SEAT Arona: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit more power
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
details

SEAT Arona

4.9 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly cheaper
  • very slightly more efficient
  • moderately lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Puma

Matchup at a glance

Ford Puma VS SEAT Arona set up a neat duel in the subcompact crossover ring, pitting the Puma’s sporty personality against the Arona’s sensible charm. If you’re searching for a comparison of two city-friendly crossovers, this is the page that frames their characters before the spreadsheets take over. The Puma presents itself as the cheeky, more extroverted option while the Arona trades bravado for a quietly practical package. Think of this as the soft intro to the fight — style, comfort and daily usability will decide the rounds rather than raw numbers.

Arona

Vibe and road personality

The Ford Puma leans into a sporty, playful vibe with sharper steering and a cabin that feels a touch more driver-focused, while the SEAT Arona wears understatement as its badge: calm, competent and easy to live with. On twisty roads the Puma wants to entertain, on town streets the Arona prefers to get you there with minimal fuss. Interior ambience follows the same script — the Puma aims for a slightly more premium, sporty feel; the Arona keeps things practical and straightforward. Both have their own kind of charm, but they aim it at different moods behind the wheel.

Puma

How they cope with everyday life

For daily commutes and school runs the SEAT Arona feels like the shoe that fits most days—simple ergonomics, sensible packaging and an easy driving position that removes stress. The Ford Puma makes mundane trips more enjoyable thanks to its livelier handling and a cabin that rewards a more engaged driver, so longer runs feel less like a chore. Both are compact enough for city parking yet offer enough adaptability for weekend shopping and escape plans, but the Arona nudges practicality while the Puma leans toward driver comfort. If real-world usability is your priority, watch how each one treats luggage, ingress/egress and rear-seat life rather than headline specs.

Arona

Buying with your ego in mind

Choose the Ford Puma if you want a car that says you enjoy driving and appreciate a flash of style without being ostentatious; it’s the one that makes you smile reversing into a café. Pick the SEAT Arona if your decision is quieter, more about ticking boxes: efficient, unshowy and hard to argue with when spreadsheets come out. The Puma is easier to justify when the drive itself is part of the appeal, while the Arona’s strengths are the sensible, everyday gains that add up over time. Neither is about bling for bling’s sake, but they sell very different kinds of satisfaction.

Puma

Who should test-drive the Puma first

If you’re more drawn to style, a cozier cockpit and a car that behaves like it enjoys cornering, the Ford Puma should be near the top of your test-drive list — ideal for style-conscious commuters and weekend drivers who value a bit of sparkle. Buyers who prize perceived quality and a slightly more engaging drive will find the Puma more emotionally satisfying than the Arona. That said, bring the SEAT Arona along for the comparison so you can feel the difference in everyday calm and ergonomics. Try both back-to-back: the contrast between playfulness and pragmatism is the point of this duel.

Arona

Who should prefer the Arona — and why you’ll still look back at the Puma

The SEAT Arona is aimed squarely at pragmatic buyers who want a compact crossover that behaves like a grown-up: economical, easy to live with and pleasantly unobtrusive, making it a great fit for budget-minded families and city-first drivers. Its sensible layout and approachable character suit anyone who values low fuss over theatrical flair, yet the Ford Puma will still turn heads when you park beside it. If you want reassurance and everyday logic, the Arona is the safe, steady pick; if you crave a touch of drama on your commute, that’s where the Puma re-enters the conversation. Read on for the detailed numbers if you want to turn these impressions into an exact shopping shortlist.

Frequently compared as well

SEAT Arona
VW T-Cross
VS
The SEAT Arona and VW T‑Cross duke it out in the small SUV ring: the Arona brings punchy styling and a driver-focused feel, while the T‑Cross leans on roomy practicality and Volkswagen calm. Pick the Arona for a bit more sparkle and sporty character, or the T‑Cross if cargo space, refinement and …
SEAT Arona
Skoda Kamiq
VS
Between the sporty, streetwise SEAT Arona and the sensible Škoda Kamiq, the Arona wins hearts with sharper styling and a livelier chassis that makes every corner a little more fun. The Kamiq, however, is the adult in the room — smarter storage, a bigger boot and a calmer cabin, the pragmatic choice …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

SEAT Arona is slightly cheaper – starting at 20,700 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,214 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the SEAT Arona uses 5.3 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.

Arona

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers a bit more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the SEAT Arona takes 8.3 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers slightly more torque with 290 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, SEAT Arona is moderately lighter – 1,188 kg compared to 1,316 kg. The difference is around 128 kg.

When it comes to payload, the SEAT Arona carries slightly more – 522 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 53 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma is clearly ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 404 - 417 km
details
Ford Puma
SEAT Arona

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

SEAT Arona

The SEAT Arona is a cheeky urban crossover that mixes sharp styling with sensible practicality, making it an appealing choice for buyers who want personality without fuss. It’s zippy in traffic, comfortable enough for daily driving, and brings enough character to make routine journeys feel a little more fun.

details
seat-arona-One-car-countless-possibilities_07_HQ
seat-arona-One-car-countless-possibilities_06_HQ
seat-arona-One-car-countless-possibilities_04_HQ
seat-arona-One-car-countless-possibilities_02_HQ

Reviews SEAT Arona

4.9 (3 Reviews)
rate
Jorge Soares
26 Mar 2026, 01:31:22

Comprei há 2 meses o Seat Arona novo DE 95 cv... ´Trata-se da versão base...
Estou muito contente com o mesmo...
Tem um ótima posição elevada da condução, é económico, tem uma bagageira com uma boa capacidade de arrumação...
Considero que este B Suv tem uma aparência bem desportiva e atraente...
Só tenho pena deste carro não ter instalados de fábrica os faróis dianteiros de nevoeiro, nem a câmara de ré acho que isto faz muita falta a nível da segurança da condução... Só a versão superior do carro é que traz instalada isto tudo...

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

SEAT Arona
VW T-Roc
VS
Sibling rivalry in compact-SUV clothing: the SEAT Arona and VW T‑Roc go head-to-head — one brings Spanish spice and value, the other German polish and refinement. We’ll compare driving feel, practicality, tech and running costs so you can pick the compact crossover that deserves a spot in your …
Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
SEAT Arona
SEAT Ibiza
VS
Think of the SEAT Arona as the chunky crossover that gives you a higher view of the road, more boot space and practical family-friendly packaging, while the SEAT Ibiza is the sharper, lighter hatch that’s more fun to hustle through town and returns better fuel economy. Pick the Arona if you want …
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
Renault Captur
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV market, the Renault Captur and SEAT Arona stand out with their unique blends of style and practicality. While the Captur offers a versatile interior with impressive customization options, the Arona impresses with its sporty design and agile handling. Ultimately, …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
SEAT Arona
VW Taigo
VS
The SEAT Arona is the zesty city crossover that trades bravado for practicality, while the VW Taigo dresses up the same bones with a sleeker, coupé-like roofline — pick Arona for everyday sense and Taigo if style tops your shopping list. Both share VW Group underpinnings and efficient engines, so …
Ford Puma
SEAT Arona

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
20,700 - 30,500 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
120 - 132 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,188 - 1,268 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
400 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,780 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
502 - 522 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 11.1 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
Brand
Ford
Brand
SEAT
What drivetrain options does the Ford Puma have?

The Ford Puma is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.