Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs SEAT Arona - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (168 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 20700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or SEAT Arona?
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
SEAT Arona has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 20700 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4071 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: SEAT Arona manages with 5.30 L and is therefore barely noticeable more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.10 L per 100 km.
Arona
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a to a small extent edge – offering 168 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the SEAT Arona takes 8.30 s. That’s about 0.90 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls somewhat stronger with 290 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, SEAT Arona is to a small extent lighter – 1188 kg compared to 1316 kg. The difference is around 128 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers distinct more room – 523 L compared to 400 L. That’s a difference of about 123 L.
When it comes to payload, SEAT Arona slightly takes the win – 522 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 53 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £24,800
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
2 (7 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
SEAT Arona
4.9 (1 Reviews)
The SEAT Arona is a cheeky urban crossover that mixes sharp styling with sensible practicality, making it an appealing choice for buyers who want personality without fuss. It’s zippy in traffic, comfortable enough for daily driving, and brings enough character to make routine journeys feel a little more fun.
details
Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
20700 - 30500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
120 - 132 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1188 - 1268 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
400 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1780 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
502 - 522 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 11.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
SEAT
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.