VS

Ford Puma vs Vauxhall Frontera comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 145 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 20,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Vauxhall Frontera?

Ford Puma vs Vauxhall Frontera: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit more power
  • visibly more efficient
  • barely more electric range
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly lighter

Vauxhall Frontera

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat cheaper
  • very slightly more efficient

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Puma

City Cat Meets Country Muscle

The contrast between the Ford Puma and the Opel Frontera is almost cinematic: one plays the nimble urban athlete, the other the more purposeful, burly utility player. The Puma sashays through tight streets and parking garages with a light-footed attitude, while the Frontera projects an assured, take-it-anywhere demeanour that suits weekend adventures. Neither is ambiguous about its intentions—buying either asks you to pick a lifestyle rather than just a car. If you crave city charisma or rugged pragmatism, each makes that choice very easy to live with.

Frontera

Behind the Wheel Personality

On the road the Puma rewards quick inputs and feels eager to change direction, with a drivetrain that accentuates punch and responsiveness for drivers who want engagement. The Frontera leans toward a steadier, more composed delivery, smoothing out rough surfaces and favouring comfort over theatrical agility. Both instill confidence; it’s just a question of whether you prefer to play conductor or navigator. In everyday traffic their differing temperaments become a daily part of the experience rather than a technical note.

Puma

Cabin Comfort and Family Atmosphere

The Puma wraps occupants in a modern, driver-focused cabin that reads young and stylish, with materials and ergonomics aimed at short trips and commutes where neat packaging matters. The Frontera opts for a roomier, more utilitarian interior that prioritises space and long-haul comfort, making it the more forgiving companion for family duties or multiple passengers. Noise levels, seat comfort and perceived refinement each tilt the balance differently depending on whether you prize urban polish or spacious practicality. Both cabins succeed at serving particular daily needs rather than trying to be everything to everyone.

Frontera

Everyday Use and Loading Logic

Practicality is where character shows: the Puma hides clever storage and a fuss-free approach to daily chores, keeping routine trips tidy and predictable. The Frontera, meanwhile, feels built to swallow bulkier loads, handle weekend kit and shrug off the minor indignities of active lifestyles with less fuss. Access, visibility and the way each handles real-world cargo underline their differing priorities — one optimised for nimble living, the other for usefulness without drama. Choose the one that fits your weekly rituals rather than your idealised drive.

Puma

Looks That Talk

Styling is a loud part of the story: the Puma makes a statement with energetic proportions and youthful detailing that appeal to image-conscious buyers who want something playful. The Frontera prefers a more honest face — rugged, squared-off and unapologetically practical, which will attract owners who want presence and durability. Both designs send clear signals in parking lots and on approach, so the choice also says something about you to your neighbours. Taste will decide which language you prefer; neither is shy.

Frontera

Running Costs and the Ownership Mood

Buying and living with either car is as much about emotion as economics: the Puma carries a sense of modern convenience and refinement that can justify a premium in how it feels day-to-day. The Frontera projects value and utility, the kind of ownership experience that prioritises robustness over trend. Servicing, insurance and the way each car integrates into a routine will shape satisfaction more than any headline figures, so consider how you’ll use it across seasons. Think of this as choosing a partner for your typical week rather than a spec sheet exercise.

Puma

Who Should Walk Into the Dealership?

If your daily life is a mix of tight city chores, spirited driving and making an impression, the Ford Puma is crafted to please; if your priorities skew toward space, practicality and no-nonsense capability, the Opel Frontera will feel immediately sensible. Commuters, young professionals, style-conscious buyers and weekend warriors will each find a clear case for one or the other. Keep reading — the DriveDuel Champion will be revealed afterwards, and you won’t want to miss which car clinches the title.

Frequently compared as well

Citroen C3 Aircross
Opel Frontera
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Citroen C3 Aircross showcases its compact versatility and modern styling, appealing to urban drivers seeking practicality without compromising on flair. On the other hand, the Opel Frontera offers rugged capability and a robust design, perfect for those craving …
Opel Frontera
Opel Mokka
VS
The Opel Frontera is a rugged, old-school SUV that trades creature comforts for go-anywhere attitude—perfect for buyers after analogue charm, simple mechanics and mud under the wheel arches. The Opel Mokka is the polished city slicker: compact, efficient and loaded with modern tech and safety …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Vauxhall Frontera is somewhat cheaper – starting at 20,700 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,180 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Vauxhall Frontera uses 5.2 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.

In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is visibly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 15.8 kWh/100km for the Vauxhall Frontera. That’s a difference of about 2.8 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers barely more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 9 km more than the Vauxhall Frontera.

Frontera

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers a bit more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 145 HP. That’s roughly 23 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Vauxhall Frontera takes 9.1 s. That’s about 1.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers noticeably more torque with 290 Nm compared to 230 Nm. That’s about 60 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Vauxhall Frontera offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is only slightly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,394 kg. The difference is around 78 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Vauxhall Frontera carries somewhat more – 570 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 101 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma sits just ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 404 - 417 km
details
Ford Puma
Vauxhall Frontera

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Vauxhall Frontera

The Opel Frontera wears its rugged, go-anywhere intentions proudly, serving up a simple, no-nonsense package that feels as comfortable off the beaten track as it does at the supermarket. It won’t set hearts racing with glamour, but its honest practicality and rugged charm make it a smart pick for buyers who prefer substance over style.

details
NewOpelFronteraElectric
NewOpelFronteraElectric (1)
NewOpelFronteraElectric (2)
NewOpelFronteraElectric (3)
NewOpelFronteraElectric (4)
NewOpelFronteraElectric (5)
NewOpelFronteraElectric (7)

Reviews Vauxhall Frontera

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
H. P.
19 Dec 2025, 13:27:19

Opel has clearly skimped here. Misaligned panel gaps, no position/parking light, patchy workmanship and ill‑fitting parts — for example the partition between the passenger footwell and the engine bay — the owner's manual is inadequate and at times reads like a fairy tale; many of the functions it describes are nowhere to be found. They simply don't exist. And the claimed fuel consumption? Even with normal driving — that is, without acceleration orgies — it's unattainable.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Opel Frontera
Opel Grandland
VS
The Frontera feels like a bruiser from the analogue era — raw, rugged and surprisingly capable off-road, ideal if you crave adventure and don't mind a bit of mechanical charm. The Grandland, by contrast, is a slick, family-friendly crossover loaded with modern tech, efficient engines and a …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In one corner, the Ford Puma brings sporty flair and sharp handling to the small-SUV ring; in the other, the SEAT Arona sticks to sensible practicality and wallet-friendly charm. Which one wins your city commute, weekend escape and resale cheque comes down to whether you want fun on twisty roads or …
Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
Ford Puma
VW T-Cross
VS
The Ford Puma and VW T‑Cross go head-to-head in the compact crossover class — one flirty and fun, the other sensible and steady — both promising SUV looks without the bulk. We’ll pit the Puma’s lively handling and clever storage tricks against the T‑Cross’s comfort-first setup and family-friendly …
Ford Puma
Lexus LBX
VS
Small crossover clash: the Ford Puma brings cheeky driving dynamics and clever practicality, while the Lexus LBX counters with quiet refinement and premium flair. Pick the Puma if you want fun and value, choose the LBX if you crave comfort and a luxury badge — either way, you’ll be trading up from …
Jeep Avenger
Opel Frontera
VS
The Jeep Avenger is a cheeky, compact crossover that dresses up like an off-roader but thrives in the city — zippy, efficient and ideal if you want Jeep styling without the gas-guzzling bravado. The Opel Frontera, by contrast, is a more grown-up SUV: roomier, practical and better suited to family …
Ford Puma
Vauxhall Frontera

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
20,700 - 30,000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 5.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 18.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
305 - 408 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
0 - 119 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,394 - 1,610 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
460 L
Length
-
Length
4,385 mm
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Height
-
Height
1,635 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,600 L
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
436 - 570 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
110 - 145 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 - 14.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
143 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
125 - 230 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
81 - 107 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
Brand
Ford
Brand
Vauxhall
What drivetrain options does the Ford Puma have?

The Ford Puma is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.