@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Renault Group Media
VS

Ford Puma vs Renault R5 – Which one offers the better deal?

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Renault R5?

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Fierce Competition: Ford Puma Versus Renault R5

In the electric-driven era of modern automobiles, two contenders have electrified the streets with their innovative technologies and appealing designs – the Ford Puma and the Renault R5. These models, representing their respective brands, Ford and Renault, have become popular choices for automotive enthusiasts. Each car offers unique strengths, ensuring versatile options for potential buyers.

R5 @ Renault Group Media

Design and Dimensions

The Ford Puma exudes presence with its robust SUV design, offering a modern aesthetic suitable for urban jungles and weekend adventures alike. The Puma measures between 4186 mm and 4226 mm in length, flaunting a width of 1805 mm and a height of up to 1555 mm. This allows for a spacious interior, promoting comfort for up to five passengers.

Renault, on the other hand, stays true to its roots with the Renault R5's iconic hatchback silhouette. At 3922 mm in length, 1744 mm in width, and 1498 mm in height, its compact design makes it ideal for city travel while still supporting comfort for a five-passenger configuration.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Engine and Performance

In terms of powertrains, the Ford Puma leads the way with both petrol MHEV and full-electric options. The petrol model boasts an engine capacity of 999 cm3, generating power between 125 HP and 168 HP, supported by a manual gearbox or dual-clutch automatic transmission. Electric variants offer smooth rides with power ranging up to 160 HP, boasting electric ranges of up to 376 km and showcasing an ultra-efficient consumption of 13.1 to 13.7 kWh/100 km.

The Renault R5 relies solely on electric power, offering options between 95 HP and 150 HP, with consumption at 14.8 kWh/100 km. The R5 demonstrates prowess on the road with a maximum speed of 150 km/h and acceleration times ranging from 8 to 9 seconds, making it quick off the line. The electric range peaks at an impressive 405 km, providing ample freedom for long journeys.

R5 @ Renault Group Media

Technical Innovations

Both contenders have placed significant emphasis on technological advancements. The Ford Puma's implementation of MHEV technology blends the benefits of internal combustion engines with the environmental advantages of electric motors, promoting an efficient and eco-conscious driving experience. Coupled with CO2 efficiency classes ranging from D to A, the Puma strives for a balance between performance and sustainability.

The Renault R5 shines with a zero-emission electric drive, securing its CO2 efficiency class A rating. Through its reduction gearbox and efficient electric motor architectures, it aims to provide a greener footprint without sacrificing power and thrill. This aligns with environmental norms and the push toward sustainable transportation solutions.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Practicality and Usability

The Puma’s trunk capacity varies from 456 L to 523 L, catering well to those who require ample space for luggage or sports equipment. The curb weight ranges from 1316 kg to 1563 kg, with a payload of up to 469 kg, ensuring versatility in carrying additional loads.

Meanwhile, the R5 offers a trunk capacity of 326 L, slightly more modest but sufficient for daily needs or short vacations. With a curb weight of 1447 kg to 1524 kg and a payload ranging up to 418 kg, the Renault R5 remains a practical choice for urban dwellers.

R5 @ Renault Group Media

Conclusion

Both the Ford Puma and the Renault R5 have carved their niches in the automotive landscape. The Puma presents a robust SUV experience with varied powertrain selections, while the Renault R5 offers an endearing, purely electric alternative with a nod to its storied heritage. Ultimately, the choice lies in the beholder's needs — whether it's the expansive versatility of the Puma or the Renault R5’s impressive urban simplicity and sustainable drive.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Renault R5 has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23900 £, while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £. That’s a price difference of around 857 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s to a small extent more efficient than the Renault R5 with 14.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.70 kWh.

As for range, the Renault R5 performs minimal better – achieving up to 405 km, about 29 km more than the Ford Puma.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault R5 has a clearly edge – offering 540 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 372 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault R5 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.50 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 3.90 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Renault R5 performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 270 km/h, while the Ford Puma tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 60 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Renault R5 pulls clearly stronger with 4800 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 4510 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Puma is hardly perceptible lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1447 kg. The difference is around 131 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers noticeable more room – 523 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 197 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs a bit better – up to 1283 L, which is about 177 L more than the Renault R5.

When it comes to payload, Ford Puma to a small extent takes the win – 469 kg compared to 418 kg. That’s a difference of about 51 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Renault R5 proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Renault R5 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £23,900
R5 @ Renault Group Media

Renault R5

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 122 - 540 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.8 - 15.2 kWh
  • Electric Range : 307 - 405 km
details

Ford Puma

5 (1)
rate

The Ford Puma presents itself as a stylish compact SUV with a distinctive design that combines practicality with a dynamic driving experience. Its sleek lines and sporty aesthetics make it stand out on the road, while the interior offers a comfortable and tech-savvy environment. With an emphasis on efficiency and a smooth drive, the Ford Puma is well-suited for both urban commutes and countryside adventures.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Renault R5

5 (1)
rate

The Renault R5 is a classic hatchback that captured the imagination of drivers with its distinctive design and compact versatility. Its agile handling and efficient performance made it a popular choice in urban settings and winding country roads alike. With a blend of style and practicality, the Renault R5 remains a beloved icon in automotive history.

details
D9BB3E56-4B0D-4E48-A734-11A1714B92A5 @ Renault Group Media
79A3C149-BC71-4BE3-A149-986DD84D251C @ Renault Group Media
DDEACB99-545B-4C72-B12C-AB35E7B77365 @ Renault Group Media

Top Car Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
MG MG4
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered compact crossover that feels taut and practical — with Ford's lively chassis, a roomy MegaBox boot and mild‑hybrid frugality — the Puma is the small SUV to live with. But if you're ready to go electric without blowing the budget, the MG4 serves up surprising …
Ford Puma
Renault R5
Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
R5 @ Renault Group Media

Costs and Consumption
Price
24800 - 36300 £
Price
23900 - 137100 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 15.2 kWh
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Electric Range
307 - 405 km
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
Battery Capacity
40 - 52 kWh
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
2 - 5
Doors
5
Doors
3 - 5
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Curb weight
1447 - 1524 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
326 L
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Length
3922 - 4080 mm
Width
1805 mm
Width
1744 - 2030 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Height
1380 - 1498 mm
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
396 - 418 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
122 - 540 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.5 - 9 s
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
150 - 270 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
225 - 4800 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
90 - 397 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025 - 2027
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Renault

Similar Comparisons

@ Renault Group Media
Renault R5
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo EX30
VS
The Renault 5 brings playful retro charm and clever city-sized packaging, while the Volvo EX30 feels like a pocket rocket from the future with serious EV range and safety tech. If you want personality and urban thrift go R5, but if you crave rapid electric shove, cutting-edge gadgets and …
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
BYD Dolphin
@ Renault Group Media
Renault R5
VS
In the evolving landscape of electric vehicles, the BYD Dolphin and Renault R5 stand out as compelling options for eco-conscious drivers. The Dolphin impresses with its spacious interior and cutting-edge technology, making it a practical choice for urban commuting. Meanwhile, the Renault R5 …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Frontera
VS
The Ford Puma feels like a sprightly urban fox — compact, efficient and packed with modern tech, perfect if you want lively handling and low running costs for daily driving. The Opel Frontera is all rugged charm and chunky presence, built for dirt tracks and weekend hauls rather than tight city …
@ Renault Group Media
Renault R5
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW ID.3
VS
In the battle of retro charm versus modern innovation, the Renault R5 and VW ID.3 both offer distinct approaches to electric mobility. The R5 captivates with its nostalgic design and playful driving dynamics, while the ID.3 impresses with its advanced technology and spacious interior. Ultimately, …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Focus
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
VS
In the realm of compact vehicles, the Ford Focus and Ford Puma present two compelling choices, each with its own unique appeal. The Focus is celebrated for its spacious interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it an ideal option for families and enthusiasts alike. On the other hand, the Puma …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
BYD Dolphin Surf
VS
The Ford Puma and the BYD Dolphin went head-to-head in a thrilling comparison, showcasing unique strengths for diverse drivers. The Ford Puma offers a smooth blend of performance and style with its more traditional compact SUV design, appealing to those who value a sporty driving experience. …
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.