Ford Puma vs Renault R5 - Differences and prices compared

Q: What is the maximum horsepower of the Ford Puma?

Up to 168 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

Q: What is the fuel consumption of the Ford Puma according to the manufacturer?

On average, the Ford Puma consumes 5.40 L.

Q: How much electricity does the Ford Puma use per 100 km?

According to the manufacturer, the Ford Puma requires 13.10 kWh.

Q: What is the Ford Puma’s maximum WLTP range?

The WLTP range is up to 376 km.

Q: What is the battery capacity of the Ford Puma?

The Ford Puma comes with a 43 kWh battery.

Q: What is the top speed of the Ford Puma?

The Ford Puma reaches up to 210 km/h.

Q: What are the Ford Puma’s length, width and height?

Overall, the Ford Puma is 4214 mm long, 1805 mm wide and 1555 mm high.

Q: What drive types are available for the Renault R5?

The Renault R5 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

Q: How powerful is the Renault R5's engine?

Depending on the version, the Renault R5 delivers up to 540 HP.

Compare performance (168 HP vs 540 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 23900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Renault R5?

scroll down

Puma

City Swagger vs Retro Chic

The compact crossover attitude of the Ford Puma reads like a modern city companion — poised, practical and a touch sporty — while the Renault R5 arrives with a wink to classic motoring and a design that doubles as a conversation starter. In short, one leans into familiar SUV cues and everyday usefulness, the other trades convention for personality and retro-futurist charm. Both will turn heads for different reasons, and choosing between them often comes down to whether you want understated utility or characterful identity.

What It Feels Like Behind the Wheel

The driving experience of the Ford Puma is set up to reassure: composed body control, predictable steering and a planted feel that suits busy streets and sweeping suburban roads alike. The Renault R5, by contrast, is punchy and eager, delivering a more animated and theatrical response that rewards enthusiastic inputs. If you prefer a calm, confidence-inspiring commute you’ll appreciate the Puma’s manners; if you like theatre and immediacy when you prod the throttle, the R5 brings more theatrics to the table.

Puma

Comfort and Everyday Life

On the comfort front the Ford Puma feels like the practical choice for daily chores and family routines, with a forgiving ride and a layout that makes loading and living with the car straightforward. The Renault R5 takes a cosier approach, with cabin styling that feels boutique and clever packaging that suits urban dwellers, though it can be a little tighter for taller passengers in the back. Both manage to balance comfort with their distinct characters, so your priorities — cargo versus charm, space versus style — will tip the scales.

scroll down

Controls, Screens and Everyday Usability

The Ford Puma favours familiar ergonomics and quick-to-use controls that reduce fuss on a hectic weekday, while the Renault R5 embraces a more modern, sometimes playful digital layout that rewards exploration and looks cutting-edge on the pavement. Practical touches and user-friendliness lean slightly toward the Puma’s pragmatic setup, but if you enjoy clever interfaces and a characterful infotainment experience the R5 will keep you entertained. Both cars are useable day-to-day, it’s just a question of whether you prefer straightforward or stylish interactions.

Puma

Style, Presence and Personality

The Ford Puma projects contemporary SUV attitude — muscular lines and a purposeful stance that say “I’m ready for life’s errands” — whereas the Renault R5 trades that anonymity for personality, a look that’s deliberately nostalgic yet modern. Your choice here signals more than a design preference: it’s a statement about whether you blend in with practical polish or stand out with retro flair. Either way, both have strong visual identities that will attract very different kinds of compliments at the traffic lights.

Who Should Drive Each One?

City commuters and buyers who prize everyday practicality, easy loading and unflappable manners will find a natural home with the Ford Puma, which leans into familiar versatility and comfort. Style-conscious drivers, early adopters and those who want a distinctive, characterful urban machine would be more at ease with the Renault R5, which rewards those who enjoy making an entrance and living with something a bit different. Consider how you spend most of your miles: steady, flexible usefulness or personality-packed urban driving will point you in the right direction.

Puma

Stick Around for the Final Verdict

Both cars bring clear personalities and sensible strengths to the showroom floor, leaving the choice to your lifestyle and taste rather than a single clear advantage — and that’s precisely why this matchup is so interesting. Read on to see the full DriveDuel assessment and find out which contender takes the crown in our detailed comparison — the DriveDuel Champion will be revealed afterwards.

Ford Puma

2.4 (8 Reviews)

Renault R5

5 (1 Reviews)

You can find all user reviews further down on this page.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Renault R5 has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23900 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 857 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s to a small extent more efficient than the Renault R5 with 14.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.70 kWh.

As for electric range, the Renault R5 performs minimal better – achieving up to 405 km, about 29 km more than the Ford Puma.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault R5 has a clearly edge – offering 540 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 372 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault R5 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.50 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 3.90 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Renault R5 performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 270 km/h, while the Ford Puma tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 60 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Renault R5 pulls clearly stronger with 4800 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 4510 Nm difference.

scroll down

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Puma is hardly perceptible lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1447 kg. The difference is around 131 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers noticeable more room – 523 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 197 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs a bit better – up to 1283 L, which is about 177 L more than the Renault R5.

When it comes to payload, Ford Puma to a small extent takes the win – 469 kg compared to 418 kg. That’s a difference of about 51 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault R5 sits well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Ford Puma

Renault R5

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Price

Consumption kWh/100km

Electric Range

Battery Capacity

co2

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Power HP

Acceleration 0-100km/h

Max Speed

Torque

Power kW

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Seats

Curb weight

Trunk capacity

Max trunk capacity

Payload

from about £23,900

Renault R5

Price : 23900 - 137100 £
Body Type : Hatchback
Engine Type : Electric
Transmission : Automatic
Transmission Detail : Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP : 122 - 540 HP
Consumption kWh/100km : 14.8 - 15.2 kWh
Electric Range : 307 - 405 km
Battery Capacity : 40 - 52 kWh
Seats : 2 - 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h : 3.5 - 9 s
Model Year : 2025 - 2027
Max Speed : 150 - 270 km/h
Torque : 225 - 4800 Nm
Doors : 3 - 5
Model : R5
Modell : R5 E-Tech Electric 150 Comfort Range (52 kWh), R5 E-Tech Electric 120 Urban Range (40 kWh), R5 Turbo 3E
CO2 Efficiency Class : A
Trim Level : Iconic Five, Techno, Evolution, Roland-Garros
Power kW : 90 - 397 kW
co2 : 0 g/km
Curb weight : 1447 - 1524 kg
Trunk capacity : 326 L
Length : 3922 - 4080 mm
Width : 1744 - 2030 mm
Height : 1380 - 1498 mm
Brand : Renault
Max trunk capacity : 1106 L
Payload : 396 - 418 kg

details

Ford Puma

2.4 (8 Reviews)

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details

Renault R5

5 (1 Reviews)

The Renault 5 is a cheeky city car that marries retro charm with modern flair, its playful looks promising smiles before you even start the engine. Practical enough for daily life yet lively enough to make short trips feel like mini adventures, it’s an irresistible choice for buyers who prefer personality to bland practicality.

details

Reviews Ford Puma

2.4 (8 Reviews)

Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

Show detailed rating

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)

Efficiency / Consumption & Range

Comfort & Interior

Driving Fun / Performance

Technology & Infotainment

Safety

Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use

Value for Money

Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

Show detailed rating

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business

Efficiency / Consumption & Range

Comfort & Interior

Driving Fun / Performance

Technology & Infotainment

Safety

Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use

Value for Money

Top Car Comparisons

Ford Puma

Mazda CX-30

In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …

Renault Clio

Renault R5

Renault Clio and Renault R5 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.

Ford Puma

Renault R5

Costs and Consumption
Price 24800 - 36300 £	Price 23900 - 137100 £
Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 5.9 L	Consumption L/100km -
Consumption kWh/100km 13.1 - 13.9 kWh	Consumption kWh/100km 14.8 - 15.2 kWh
Electric Range 361 - 376 km	Electric Range 307 - 405 km
Battery Capacity 43 kWh	Battery Capacity 40 - 52 kWh
co2 0 - 135 g/km	co2 0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 42 L	Fuel tank capacity -

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type Hatchback
Seats 5	Seats 2 - 5
Doors 5	Doors 3 - 5
Curb weight 1316 - 1563 kg	Curb weight 1447 - 1524 kg
Trunk capacity 456 - 523 L	Trunk capacity 326 L
Length 4186 - 4226 mm	Length 3922 - 4080 mm
Width 1805 mm	Width 1744 - 2030 mm
Height 1550 - 1555 mm	Height 1380 - 1498 mm
Max trunk capacity 1216 - 1283 L	Max trunk capacity 1106 L
Payload 367 - 469 kg	Payload 396 - 418 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Electric, Petrol MHEV	Engine Type Electric
Transmission Automatic, Manuel	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic	Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP 125 - 168 HP	Power HP 122 - 540 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.4 - 9.8 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 3.5 - 9 s
Max Speed 160 - 210 km/h	Max Speed 150 - 270 km/h
Torque 170 - 290 Nm	Torque 225 - 4800 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3	Number of Cylinders -
Power kW 92 - 124 kW	Power kW 90 - 397 kW
Engine capacity 999 cm3	Engine capacity -