VS

Ford Puma vs Renault R5 comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 24,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Renault R5?

Ford Puma vs Renault R5: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • barely cheaper
  • moderately more power
  • somewhat more efficient
  • barely more electric range
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely lighter
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

Renault R5

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Puma

City Swagger vs Retro Chic

The compact crossover attitude of the Ford Puma reads like a modern city companion — poised, practical and a touch sporty — while the Renault R5 arrives with a wink to classic motoring and a design that doubles as a conversation starter. In short, one leans into familiar SUV cues and everyday usefulness, the other trades convention for personality and retro-futurist charm. Both will turn heads for different reasons, and choosing between them often comes down to whether you want understated utility or characterful identity.

R5

What It Feels Like Behind the Wheel

The driving experience of the Ford Puma is set up to reassure: composed body control, predictable steering and a planted feel that suits busy streets and sweeping suburban roads alike. The Renault R5, by contrast, is punchy and eager, delivering a more animated and theatrical response that rewards enthusiastic inputs. If you prefer a calm, confidence-inspiring commute you’ll appreciate the Puma’s manners; if you like theatre and immediacy when you prod the throttle, the R5 brings more theatrics to the table.

Puma

Comfort and Everyday Life

On the comfort front the Ford Puma feels like the practical choice for daily chores and family routines, with a forgiving ride and a layout that makes loading and living with the car straightforward. The Renault R5 takes a cosier approach, with cabin styling that feels boutique and clever packaging that suits urban dwellers, though it can be a little tighter for taller passengers in the back. Both manage to balance comfort with their distinct characters, so your priorities — cargo versus charm, space versus style — will tip the scales.

R5

Controls, Screens and Everyday Usability

The Ford Puma favours familiar ergonomics and quick-to-use controls that reduce fuss on a hectic weekday, while the Renault R5 embraces a more modern, sometimes playful digital layout that rewards exploration and looks cutting-edge on the pavement. Practical touches and user-friendliness lean slightly toward the Puma’s pragmatic setup, but if you enjoy clever interfaces and a characterful infotainment experience the R5 will keep you entertained. Both cars are useable day-to-day, it’s just a question of whether you prefer straightforward or stylish interactions.

Puma

Style, Presence and Personality

The Ford Puma projects contemporary SUV attitude — muscular lines and a purposeful stance that say “I’m ready for life’s errands” — whereas the Renault R5 trades that anonymity for personality, a look that’s deliberately nostalgic yet modern. Your choice here signals more than a design preference: it’s a statement about whether you blend in with practical polish or stand out with retro flair. Either way, both have strong visual identities that will attract very different kinds of compliments at the traffic lights.

R5

Who Should Drive Each One?

City commuters and buyers who prize everyday practicality, easy loading and unflappable manners will find a natural home with the Ford Puma, which leans into familiar versatility and comfort. Style-conscious drivers, early adopters and those who want a distinctive, characterful urban machine would be more at ease with the Renault R5, which rewards those who enjoy making an entrance and living with something a bit different. Consider how you spend most of your miles: steady, flexible usefulness or personality-packed urban driving will point you in the right direction.

Puma

Stick Around for the Final Verdict

Both cars bring clear personalities and sensible strengths to the showroom floor, leaving the choice to your lifestyle and taste rather than a single clear advantage — and that’s precisely why this matchup is so interesting. Read on to see the full DriveDuel assessment and find out which contender takes the crown in our detailed comparison — the DriveDuel Champion will be revealed afterwards.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Ford Puma is barely cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Renault R5 costs 24,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 86 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is somewhat more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 14.8 kWh/100km for the Renault R5. That’s a difference of about 1.8 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers barely more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 12 km more than the Renault R5.

R5

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers moderately more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Renault R5 takes 8 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers a bit more torque with 290 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 45 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is barely lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,447 kg. The difference is around 131 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers noticeably more boot space – 523 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 197 L.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries somewhat more – 469 kg compared to 418 kg. That’s a difference of about 51 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 404 - 417 km
Ford Puma
Renault R5

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details

Renault R5

The Renault 5 blends classic styling cues with contemporary design, giving it a playful and characterful presence on the road. It’s a city-focused hatchback that feels nimble and cleverly packaged, ideal for drivers who want personality and practicality.

details
Ford Puma
Renault R5

Costs and Consumption

Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
24,000 - 27,000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 15.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
307 - 405 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,447 - 1,524 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
326 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,744 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
396 - 418 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
122 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
225 - 245 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
90 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Renault
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.