VS

Ford Puma vs Toyota Yaris Cross comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 130 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 23,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Toyota Yaris Cross?

Ford Puma vs Toyota Yaris Cross: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly more trunk space
details

Toyota Yaris Cross

4.2 (19 Reviews)
rate
  • barely cheaper
  • noticeably more efficient
  • a bit lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Puma

Ford Puma VS Toyota Yaris Cross — quick take for shoppers

Ford Puma VS Toyota Yaris Cross set up a classic choice in the small‑SUV aisle: the Puma leans into driving enjoyment and inventive loadspace, while the Yaris Cross prioritises hybrid efficiency and everyday calm. The Puma feels younger and more engaging to drive, with a surprisingly practical boot solution that wins points for active owners. The Yaris Cross answers with a very forgiving hybrid drivetrain, a raised seat that makes city traffic less tiring and an option for extra traction where you need it. This piece teases the real‑world trade‑offs — you’ll see where each car actually shines in daily life rather than on paper.

Yaris Cross

Character and highway behaviour

The Ford Puma drives with a pronounced wag of enthusiasm: direct steering, eager responses and more shove when you ask for it, so it feels more exciting on sweeping roads and confident on motorways. The Toyota Yaris Cross is more reserved by design — it steadies the driver with predictability and a hybrid system that masks much of the work in town but becomes noticeably vocal under sustained hard acceleration. Puma’s sportier setup rewards someone who enjoys cornering or the sensation of a sharper chassis, whereas Yaris Cross rewards steady, relaxed progress and fuel thrift. Each car therefore sends a clear message: Puma for involvement, Yaris Cross for composed efficiency on longer hauls.

Puma

Comfort, cabin feel and usability

Up front, the Puma tends to serve firmer, supportive seats that suit longer stints when you want body control; its cabin reads modern thanks to large displays but sacrifices a few tactile buttons, which some drivers find fussy. The Yaris Cross offers a slightly more conventional, reassuring interior layout with solid materials and an upright seating position that makes getting in and out easy and visibility forward comfortable. Both cars feel compact behind the front row, but the Puma’s rear is notably tighter for taller passengers while the Yaris Cross’s rear doors and layout make ingress and child seat fitting marginally simpler. In short, Puma prioritises driver engagement and contemporary tech, Toyota prioritises straightforward comfort and ergonomic clarity.

Yaris Cross

Practicality and everyday cargo use

When it comes to hauling real things, the Ford Puma brings a clever edge: a washable, deep storage area and a very usable opening that turns awkward luggage into something easy to load. The Toyota Yaris Cross counters with a well‑shaped boot and a practical load floor that is genuinely helpful for groceries and weekend bags, though choosing the all‑wheel option does eat into that space. Puma’s cargo innovations reward active owners who carry muddy boots or wet kit, while Yaris Cross’s layout rewards families and commuters who want predictable, easy loading day after day. Visibility and parking also differ: Puma’s rear view is more restricted but camera systems help, while Yaris Cross’s higher seating and simpler surroundings make town manoeuvres feel more relaxed.

Puma

City friendliness versus long‑distance living

In urban life the Yaris Cross is the more civilised companion: its hybrid system and automatic behaviour make stop‑and‑go traffic effortless and very economical, which translates to fewer fuel stops and less stress. The Puma remains city‑capable and is notably nimble, but its dual‑clutch transmission can be fidgety in slow traffic and its firmer suspension transmits more of the road into the cabin. On longer trips the Puma’s sharper power delivery and composed chassis make it a more engaging and confident cruiser for overtakes and motorway cruising, whereas the Yaris Cross is quieter and more relaxed at moderate speeds but becomes more audible and strained under hard load. So choose the Yaris Cross for economy and calm in the city; choose the Puma when you value involvement and stronger motorway manners.

Yaris Cross

Who should pick which and why — a buyer fit guide

If you want something that feels alive to drive, carries outdoor gear intelligently and presents a contemporary infotainment package, the Ford Puma is the more compelling match and suits solo buyers or active couples who prioritise fun and boot cleverness. If your priority is the lowest day‑to‑day running cost, simple, fatigue‑reducing urban commuting and a stable, reliable package—possibly with extra traction in winter—the Toyota Yaris Cross fits better. Both cars compromise on rear passenger space, but they do so differently: Puma tightens the back for its sportier posture, Toyota does so to preserve efficiency and packaging. Read on to the technical comparison for the concrete trade‑offs in powertrain, consumption and dimensions that explain those real‑world differences.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Toyota Yaris Cross is barely cheaper – starting at 23,700 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 223 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota Yaris Cross uses 4.5 L/100km and is noticeably more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.9 L/100km.

Yaris Cross

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers noticeably more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 38 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Toyota Yaris Cross takes 10.7 s. That’s about 3.3 s quicker.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Toyota Yaris Cross is a bit lighter – 1,180 kg compared to 1,316 kg. The difference is around 136 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers visibly more boot space – 523 L compared to 397 L. That’s a difference of about 126 L.

When it comes to payload, the Toyota Yaris Cross carries marginally more – 510 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 41 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 404 - 417 km
Ford Puma
Toyota Yaris Cross

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details

Toyota Yaris Cross

The Toyota Yaris Cross blends the maneuverability of a small hatch with the higher driving position and practicality of a crossover, wrapped in Toyota's dependable build quality. It suits urban buyers who need easy parking, flexible cargo space and a comfortable, economical daily driver.

details
Ford Puma
Toyota Yaris Cross

Costs and Consumption

Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
23,700 - 34,300 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 4.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
101 - 108 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,180 - 1,290 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
320 - 397 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,765 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
485 - 510 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
116 - 130 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.7 - 11.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
85 - 96 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1,490 cm3

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Ford
Brand
Toyota
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.