@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VS

Mazda CX-30 vs VW T-Roc – Which model is better for everyday use?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Mazda CX-30 or VW T-Roc fits your lifestyle better.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Elegant Compact Crossovers: Mazda CX-30 vs. VW T-Roc

The compact SUV market has exploded in recent years, offering customers an attractive combination of style, performance, and utility. In this segment, the Mazda CX-30 and Volkswagen T-Roc stand out as two prominent contenders. Both vehicles deliver a compelling package; however, they come with their distinct personalities and technical specifications.

T-Roc @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Engine and Performance

The Mazda CX-30 is equipped with a robust petrol MHEV engine. Available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, it offers a choice between Front-Wheel and All-Wheel Drive, producing either 186 HP or 140 HP. This SUV accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in a range of 8.3 to 10.3 seconds, topped off with a maximum speed between 191 and 204 km/h. Its efficient design allows for a consumption rate between 5.7 and 6.6 L/100km, depending on the configuration.

In contrast, the Volkswagen T-Roc offers diversity with both petrol and diesel engine types. With power options ranging from 115 HP up to a sporty 300 HP, the T-Roc can suit a variety of driving styles. The 0 to 100 km/h acceleration varies from a moderate 12.3 seconds in the lower models to a zippy 4.9 seconds in the top-performance variant. Like the CX-30, it offers front-wheel and all-wheel drive options, consuming between 4.7 and 8.5 L/100km.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Design and Dimensions

The Mazda CX-30, measuring 4395 mm in length, 1795 mm wide, and standing 1540 mm high, provides a sleek and assertive presence on the road. It embraces Mazda’s signature design language with a beautifully sculpted body that stands out among its peers.

Meanwhile, the VW T-Roc boasts a compact form at 4236 to 4271 mm in length, and a width of either 1819 or 1811 mm. Its height varies between 1527 and 1584 mm. The T-Roc is noted for its bold visual stance and vibrant aesthetic options that appeal to a youthful and adventurous audience.

T-Roc @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Interior and Practicality

On the inside, the Mazda CX-30 and VW T-Roc both cater to comfort and utility with seating for up to five passengers. The CX-30 offers a trunk capacity of 422 to 430 liters, ideal for daily errands and short trips alike. It is designed with ergonomic excellence and refined material quality, aimed at creating an upscale ambiance.

The T-Roc, however, edges ahead with a slightly broader trunk capacity of 392 to 445 liters in the five-door versions, providing a practical edge for those valuing space efficiency. Its interior is characterized by practicality and intuitive technology that ensure a connected journey.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Efficiency and Environmental Impact

Both models deliver strong performances in terms of environmental impact. The Mazda CX-30 has a CO2 efficiency class ranging from D to E, with CO2 emissions spanning from 129 to 148 g/km. The T-Roc, on the other hand, spans a wider range from D to G class, with emissions tracking between 125 and 194 g/km, offering more variability within its engine choices.

T-Roc @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Conclusion

The Mazda CX-30 and VW T-Roc both represent compelling choices in the compact SUV category, each aiming to capture the hearts of drivers with distinct strengths. The CX-30 is inclined towards those valuing refinement and a smooth driving experience, while the T-Roc appeals to those seeking versatility, power, and bold styling. Ultimately, the choice between these two will depend on individual preferences and requirements, along with their respective design and driving dynamics.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-30 has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £, while the VW T-Roc costs 26400 £. That’s a price difference of around 1204 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: VW T-Roc manages with 5.50 L and is therefore slight more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 0.20 L per 100 km.

T-Roc @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 has a to a small extent edge – offering 186 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 36 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 8.30 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.90 s. That’s about 0.60 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the VW T-Roc performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 212 km/h, while the Mazda CX-30 tops out at 204 km/h. The difference is around 8 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: VW T-Roc pulls hardly perceptible stronger with 250 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is slight lighter – 1455 kg compared to 1465 kg. The difference is around 10 kg.

In terms of boot space, the VW T-Roc offers hardly perceptible more room – 475 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 45 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-30 performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1406 L, which is about 56 L more than the VW T-Roc.

When it comes to payload, VW T-Roc minimal takes the win – 515 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 19 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda CX-30 proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-30 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £25,200
CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.7 - 6.6 L

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details

VW T-Roc

5 (2)
rate

The VW T-Roc mixes cheeky, coupe-like styling with the everyday sense and space of an SUV, so it looks fun without sacrificing family sense. It’s a likeable all-rounder with tidy road manners and plenty of personality, ideal if you want a car that’s practical enough for chores but entertaining enough to enjoy.

details
Mazda CX-30
VW T-Roc
CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
T-Roc @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Costs and Consumption

Price
25200 - 36800 £
Price
26400 - 38000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
126 - 143 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
4 - 5
Doors
5
Doors
2 - 5
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Curb weight
1465 - 1539 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
284 - 475 L
Length
4395 mm
Length
4271 - 4373 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1811 - 1828 mm
Height
1540 mm
Height
1527 - 1573 mm
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Max trunk capacity
1350 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
368 - 515 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Max Speed
187 - 212 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
Brand
Mazda
Brand
VW
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.