VS

VW T-Cross vs VW T-Roc – Which car suits you better?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: VW T-Cross or VW T-Roc?

T-Cross @ Volkswagen

The compact SUV segment has seen remarkable growth over the years, and Volkswagen has successfully carved its niche with two distinct models: the VW T-Cross and the VW T-Roc. While both vehicles boast a robust design and considerable features, they cater to different needs and preferences. This in-depth comparison explores their technical aspects, innovations, and overall value.

T-Roc @ Volkswagen

Design and Dimensions

Starting with dimensions, the VW T-Cross measures 4127 mm in length, 1784 mm in width, and 1573 mm in height, making it slightly smaller than the VW T-Roc, which ranges between 4236 mm and 4271 mm in length, with a width of 1811-1819 mm and a height of 1527-1584 mm. This difference in size contributes to the T-Roc's more aggressive stance on the road, while the T-Cross offers a more compact form that's ideal for city driving.

T-Cross @ Volkswagen

Engine Options and Performance

When it comes to powertrains, the T-Cross presents several petrol engine options: 95 HP, 116 HP, and 150 HP, coupled with a front-wheel drive system. The 1.5-liter engine can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in just 8.4 seconds, showcasing its sporty potential.

The T-Roc, on the other hand, offers a broader selection including petrol and diesel engines, ranging from 115 HP to a robust 300 HP variant. The top-end engine, a 2.0-liter unit, mated to an all-wheel-drive system, can sprint from 0 to 100 km/h in an astonishing 4.9 seconds, underscoring its high-performance capability.

T-Roc @ Volkswagen

Fuel Efficiency and Consumption

In terms of fuel consumption, both models perform admirably. The T-Cross achieves a range of fuel economy from 5.6 to 6.0 L/100km. The T-Roc, meanwhile, provides even more variety from 4.7 L to 8.5 L/100km, depending on the engine choice. This variance provides consumers with options tailored to their specific driving habits—those prioritizing efficiency may find the T-Roc’s diesel variants particularly appealing.

T-Cross @ Volkswagen

Interior Comfort and Technology

Both vehicles seat five passengers, providing ample room for occupants with stylish interiors. The T-Cross features a trunk capacity of 455 L, which is competitive for its category, while the T-Roc offers a slightly smaller range of trunk capacities (284 to 445 L), depending on configurations. However, the T-Roc's premium feel is enhanced with higher-end materials and an advanced infotainment system, providing a more luxurious experience.

T-Roc @ Volkswagen

Safety and Innovation

Safety is paramount in both models, with comprehensive driver-assistance systems. The T-Cross offers features such as lane-keeping assist and adaptive cruise control, while the T-Roc raises the bar with additional innovations like automatic emergency braking and park assist. Both vehicles meet modern standards, garnering high safety ratings in various markets.

T-Cross @ Volkswagen

Price and Value Proposition

Pricing is an essential factor in the decision-making process. The T-Cross typically starts at a lower price point compared to the T-Roc, which is positioned as a more premium offering. Buyers seeking a budget-friendly SUV may prefer the T-Cross, while those desiring extra power, features, and a touch of luxury might gravitate towards the T-Roc.

T-Roc @ Volkswagen

Final Thoughts

In conclusion, the choice between the VW T-Cross and VW T-Roc boils down to individual needs and preferences. The T-Cross shines with its compact size and efficiency, making it an ideal choice for urban drivers. Conversely, the T-Roc satisfies those looking for a thrilling drive with advanced features and more powerful engine options. Ultimately, both models reflect Volkswagen's commitment to quality and innovation in the competitive SUV market.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

T-Cross @ Volkswagen

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

VW T-Cross has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21100 £, while the VW T-Roc costs 26400 £. That’s a price difference of around 5361 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: VW T-Cross manages with 5.40 L and is therefore barely noticeable more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.50 L. The difference is about 0.10 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

Both models deliver identical power – 150 HP each.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW T-Cross is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 8.40 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.90 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the VW T-Roc performs slight better – reaching 212 km/h, while the VW T-Cross tops out at 200 km/h. The difference is around 12 km/h.

Both models offer the same torque – 250 Nm.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, VW T-Cross is slightly lighter – 1267 kg compared to 1465 kg. The difference is around 198 kg.

In terms of boot space, the VW T-Roc offers hardly perceptible more room – 475 L compared to 455 L. That’s a difference of about 20 L.

In maximum load capacity, the VW T-Roc performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1350 L, which is about 69 L more than the VW T-Cross.

When it comes to payload, VW T-Roc barely noticeable takes the win – 515 kg compared to 480 kg. That’s a difference of about 35 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the VW T-Cross shows itself to be has a very small edge and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £21,100
DB2021AU01108_medium

VW T-Cross

  • Engine Type : Petrol
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 95 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 6 L
details

VW T-Cross

4 (1)
rate

The VW T-Cross stands out as a versatile compact SUV that combines practicality with style. Its interior design offers a spacious and flexible layout, ideal for both city driving and weekend adventures. With its modern infotainment system, the T-Cross ensures drivers and passengers stay connected throughout their journeys.

details
DB2021AU01108_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2021AU01109_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2021AU01111_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2021AU01114_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2021AU01120_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2021AU01124_medium @ Volkswagen

VW T-Roc

5 (2)
rate

The VW T-Roc seamlessly blends stylish design with practical functionality, making it an ideal choice for those who enjoy both urban and countryside driving. Its modern interior features intuitive technology and comfortable seating, enhancing the overall driving experience. With its robust build and dynamic performance, the T-Roc is equipped to handle various road conditions with confidence.

details
DB2022AU00087_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2022AU00088_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2022AU00086_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2022AU00095_medium @ Volkswagen

Similar Comparisons

VW Golf
VW T-Roc
VS
The VW Golf still sets the benchmark in the compact class — a composed, all‑round hatch that rewards drivers with precise steering, efficient engines and sensible practicality for daily life. The VW T‑Roc trades a bit of that pinch‑perfect poise for SUV style, a higher seating position and a roomier boot, so choose the Golf for sharper handling and economy or the T‑Roc if you want presence, flexibility and the delightful illusion of being an inch taller.
Audi Q3
VW T-Roc
VS
The Audi Q3 plays the compact‑premium role perfectly — a hushed, well‑built cabin, polished manners and a level of refinement that makes the higher price feel like an investment in peace of mind. The VW T‑Roc, meanwhile, is the cheekier, better‑value sibling: bolder styling, sprightlier handling and sensible practicality combine to make it the smarter pick if you want SUV looks and fun without paying for the badge.
VW T-Cross
VW T-Roc
T-Cross
T-Roc

Costs and Consumption
Price
21100 - 31500 £
Price
26400 - 38000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6 L
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
124 - 136 g/km
co2
126 - 143 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
40 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
4 - 5
Doors
5
Doors
2 - 5
Curb weight
1267 - 1338 kg
Curb weight
1465 - 1539 kg
Trunk capacity
455 L
Trunk capacity
284 - 475 L
Length
4127 mm
Length
4271 - 4373 mm
Width
1784 mm
Width
1811 - 1828 mm
Height
1573 mm
Height
1527 - 1573 mm
Max trunk capacity
1281 L
Max trunk capacity
1350 L
Payload
463 - 480 kg
Payload
368 - 515 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
180 - 200 km/h
Max Speed
187 - 212 km/h
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
Brand
VW
Brand
VW

Similar Comparisons

Kia Niro
VW T-Roc
VS
Kia Niro plays the sensible card with roomy packaging, excellent hybrid economy and impressively low running costs, while the VW T‑Roc is the flashier, more dynamic compact SUV that delivers sharper handling and a slightly more premium cabin. If you’re after thrift and family practicality go Niro; if you want style, a bit of fun and a nicer interior, the T‑Roc is the one to tempt you.
Citroen C3 Aircross
VW T-Cross
VS
Volvo XC40
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Volvo XC40 stands out with its stylish Scandinavian design and commitment to safety, offering a serene driving experience complemented by a high-quality interior. On the other hand, the VW T-Roc impresses with its sportier dynamics and customizable features, appealing to drivers who prioritize a more engaging ride. Ultimately, the choice between the XC40 and T-Roc boils down to personal preferences in style, comfort, and driving experience.
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kamiq holds its ground against the VW T-Roc by offering excellent value for money without sacrificing essential features. While the T-Roc boasts a more premium interior and sportier styling, the Kamiq impresses with its practicality and spacious cabin, making it a favorite among families. Ultimately, choosing between these two contenders will hinge on whether drivers prioritize style or functionality in their everyday rides.
Ford Puma
VW T-Cross
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Ford Puma showcases a sporty design and dynamic handling, appealing to those who crave a fun driving experience. Meanwhile, the VW T-Cross emphasizes practicality and interior space, making it a top choice for families seeking comfort on the road. Both vehicles offer impressive tech features, but their differing approaches to style and functionality make this comparison a compelling one for potential buyers.
Vauxhall Frontera
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of SUVs, the Opel Frontera stands as a solid, robust option with a storied history of off-road capability, making it appealing to adventure seekers. Meanwhile, the VW T-Roc offers a more modern aesthetic with a focus on stylish urban driving, advanced safety features, and tech-savvy interior appointments. When choosing between the two, potential buyers will weigh the Frontera's rugged legacy against the T-Roc's contemporary flair and agility.
Toyota C-HR
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV market, the Toyota C-HR stands out with its striking design and hybrid efficiency, appealing to eco-conscious drivers. In contrast, the VW T-Roc offers a more traditional, yet stylish approach with a focus on practicality and customizable features, catering to those who value versatility. Ultimately, both vehicles bring unique strengths to the table, making the choice between them largely dependent on personal preference and lifestyle needs.
Nissan Qashqai
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive segment of compact SUVs, the Nissan Qashqai and VW T-Roc stand out for their unique styling and diverse feature sets. While the Qashqai is celebrated for its spacious interior and user-friendly technology, the T-Roc appeals to those seeking a sportier performance and premium interior options. Ultimately, choosing between these two best-sellers will depend on whether practicality or a dynamic driving experience takes precedence for the buyer.
What drive types are available for the VW T-Cross?

The VW T-Cross is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.