VS

Vauxhall Mokka vs VW T-Roc comparison

Compare performance (281 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (23,000 £ vs 26,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Vauxhall Mokka or VW T-Roc?

Vauxhall Mokka vs VW T-Roc: Key differences

Vauxhall Mokka

4.3 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat cheaper
  • significantly more power
  • a bit more efficient
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately lighter
  • slightly more trunk space
details

VW T-Roc

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Mokka

Quick take: Vauxhall Mokka VS VW T‑Roc

Vauxhall Mokka VS VW T-Roc puts a stylish, city‑biased compact SUV against a more grown‑up, space‑oriented rival. The Vauxhall Mokka projects personality and tight‑city agility, while the VW T‑Roc leans into quiet confidence and everyday practicality. Buyers notice the Mokka first for its bold looks and easy urban manners; the T‑Roc wins hearts with a calmer ride and a more substantial interior. Choosing between them is about prioritising style and manoeuvrability (Mokka) or space and perceived quality (T‑Roc).

T-Roc

Comfort and long‑distance behaviour

The Vauxhall Mokka feels composed around town and rewards relaxed, low‑speed cruising with a quiet electric option, but its ride can get fussy over long motorway miles. By contrast, the VW T‑Roc is engineered for longer runs: better sound insulation, a steadier posture at speed and an adaptive suspension that soothes big road undulations. In everyday commuting the Mokka’s softer, city‑tuned manners are pleasant, yet repeat long‑distance drivers will appreciate the T‑Roc’s composed highway demeanour. If motorway serenity and low cabin noise matter most, the T‑Roc takes the edge; if short trips and a tranquil electric city commute are the norm, the Mokka holds strong appeal.

Mokka

City friendliness and everyday usability

In tight streets the Vauxhall Mokka is noticeably easier to place, with compact footprint and parking aids that make city chores less stressful. The VW T‑Roc manages urban driving too but presents a taller stance and slightly larger footprint that trade off a touch of manoeuvrability for a better view over traffic. Cockpit ergonomics differ: the Mokka aims for a clean, modern layout with some touch reliance, while the T‑Roc brings familiar Volkswagen controls that feel predictable and less fiddly. For apartment dwellers and frequent parkers the Mokka’s city‑centric packaging is more user‑friendly, whereas the T‑Roc suits buyers who want city ability plus a more practical daily cabin.

T-Roc

Cabin feel and perceived quality

The VW T‑Roc clearly outpoints the Vauxhall Mokka on material quality and the sense of solidity when you close the doors; soft trims and tidy joins give the T‑Roc a near‑premium aura. The Mokka trades some of that tactile refinement for a more graphic, contemporary dashboard and visually fresh touches that appeal to style‑minded buyers. Controls in the T‑Roc tend to feel heavier and more precise, whereas the Mokka’s interface is simpler but occasionally less responsive in its touch sections. If a grown‑up, reassuring interior is a priority the T‑Roc will satisfy more often; if modern looks and a youthful cockpit matter, the Mokka makes a stronger first impression.

Mokka

Practicality, rear space and load carrying

The VW T‑Roc wins the practicality battle in day‑to‑day terms: more usable rear legroom, a flexible rear seat layout and a larger, easier‑loaded boot make it the better family companion. The Vauxhall Mokka’s boot and rear cabin are tighter, with a higher lip and less forgiving access that curtails bulky shopping or holiday gear. For couples or singles who rarely carry rear passengers or big loads the Mokka’s compact advantages outweigh its storage limits, but for parents and those who prioritise cargo versatility the T‑Roc’s packaging is the smarter choice. Both cars offer sensible cabin storage, yet the T‑Roc simply stretches usefulness further for real‑world hauling.

T-Roc

Buyer fit — who should choose which, and why

If your life is city‑centric, you value distinctive styling and effortless parking, the Vauxhall Mokka matches that lifestyle and rewards short trips with a relaxed, efficient character. If you regularly carry passengers, do motorway miles or want a cabin that feels a step up in finish, the VW T‑Roc fits better and scales more comfortably with family needs. The trade‑off is clear: pick the Mokka for personality, ease in tight spaces and a fresher design; pick the T‑Roc for composure, interior quality and everyday utility. Use that checklist to frame the deeper technical comparison that follows — drivetrain choices, boot measurements and equipment will confirm which set of compromises you prefer.

Frequently compared as well

VW Golf
VW T-Roc
VS
Deciding between the VW Golf and the VW T‑Roc is about choosing whether you prefer a classic, driver-focused hatchback or a compact SUV with higher ride height and added practicality. The Golf delivers sharper handling and refined efficiency, while the T‑Roc brings more interior space and a more …
Opel Frontera
Opel Mokka
VS
Comparing the Opel Frontera and the Opel Mokka highlights two very different takes on the SUV idea: the Frontera is a rugged, older off‑road capable SUV, while the Mokka is a modern compact crossover built for city life and efficiency. This short guide will walk through their real‑world strengths …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mokka

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Vauxhall Mokka is somewhat cheaper – starting at 23,000 £ , while the VW T-Roc costs 26,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,390 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Vauxhall Mokka uses 4.9 L/100km and is a bit more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.6 L/100km.

T-Roc

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Vauxhall Mokka offers significantly more power – delivering 281 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 131 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Vauxhall Mokka is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.9 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.9 s. That’s about 3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Vauxhall Mokka delivers visibly more torque with 345 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 95 Nm more.

Mokka

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Vauxhall Mokka is moderately lighter – 1,294 kg compared to 1,465 kg. The difference is around 171 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Vauxhall Mokka offers slightly more boot space – 350 L compared to 284 L. That’s a difference of about 66 L.

When it comes to payload, the VW T-Roc carries noticeably more – 515 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 115 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Vauxhall Mokka stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,000
Mokka

Vauxhall Mokka

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 136 - 281 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.4 - 18.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 336 - 403 km
details
Vauxhall Mokka
VW T-Roc

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Vauxhall Mokka

The Opel Mokka is a compact crossover that blends bold, modern styling with a practical, city-friendly footprint. It delivers a comfortable ride and a well-appointed interior with straightforward tech, making it a smart choice for urban drivers who want a stylish yet sensible small SUV.

details
001_Opel-Mokka-512749
006_Opel-Mokka-512753
005_Opel-Mokka-512752
015_Opel-Mokka-512759
011_Opel-Mokka-513096

Reviews Vauxhall Mokka

4.3 (5 Reviews)
rate
yannick
18 Apr 2026, 11:17:27

I've been an Opel owner for 34 years and am very satisfied with the brand — my choice will be an easy one.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

VW T-Roc

The Volkswagen T‑Roc is a stylish, well-proportioned crossover that blends hatchback agility with SUV presence. It delivers a comfortable cabin, user-friendly tech and a composed ride, making it a sensible choice for buyers who want practicality with a bit of character.

details
DB2025AU01832_medium
DB2025AU01833_medium
DB2025AU01840_medium
DB2025AU01844_medium
DB2025AU01835_medium
DB2025AU01866_medium
DB2025AU01834_medium
DB2025AU01852_medium

Reviews VW T-Roc

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
Ester
17 Sept 2025, 14:29:41

I've been driving the VW T‑Roc for a few months now and I'm totally satisfied. 🚗 The higher seating position gives me a great feeling of security and the visibility in city traffic is excellent. I especially like the modern infotainment system — everything works intuitively and quickly. On the motorway it feels very calm and stable, even at higher speeds. Overall a great car that's a lot of fun and still economical.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Kamiq and the VW T‑Roc comes down to whether you prioritise everyday practicality and value or a bolder, slightly sportier compact SUV. Both share similar underpinnings, but the Kamiq excels in interior space and efficiency while the T‑Roc offers sharper styling and a …
SEAT Arona
VW T-Roc
VS
Sibling rivalry in compact-SUV clothing: the SEAT Arona and VW T‑Roc go head-to-head — one brings Spanish spice and value, the other German polish and refinement. We’ll compare driving feel, practicality, tech and running costs so you can pick the compact crossover that deserves a spot in your …
Opel Astra
Opel Mokka
VS
The Opel Astra is the grown-up compact — practical, composed and roomy enough for weekend gear, while the Opel Mokka trades boot space for a higher driving position, sharper looks and crossover sass. Pick the Astra for better value, comfort and lower running costs; choose the Mokka if you crave …
SEAT Ateca
VW T-Roc
VS
The SEAT Ateca and the VW T‑Roc are two closely related compact crossover SUVs from the Volkswagen Group, each offering a blend of practicality, comfort and engaging driving manners. This comparison will highlight where the Ateca’s straightforward value and roomy practicality differ from the …
Lexus LBX
VW T-Roc
VS
The Lexus LBX feels like a posh city cocoon — whisper-quiet, well-stitched and leaning into hybrid efficiency and premium touches — while the VW T‑Roc is a cheeky, practical all-rounder that drives with more snap, offers more space and gives better value for the money. Choose the LBX if you want …
Nissan Qashqai
VW T-Roc
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, family-friendly compact SUV — roomy, quietly comfortable and packed with practical tech for long motorway miles. The VW T-Roc swaps a little rear-seat space for cheeky styling and sharper handling, so if you want personality and a bit more driver engagement it’s …
Opel Corsa
Opel Mokka
VS
The Opel Corsa is the cheeky city hatch that zips into parking spaces and pockets with equal ease, while the Opel Mokka trades that nimble charm for SUV attitude, a higher driving position and a few extra inches of boot space. If you want affordable fun and frugal running costs, pick the Corsa; if …
Nissan Juke
Opel Mokka
VS
The Nissan Juke is a cheeky, compact crossover with bulging arches, zesty handling and personality to spare, while the Opel Mokka takes a more grown-up route — solid, spacious and quietly efficient with a neater cabin and calmer ride. Pick the Juke if you want to stand out and have fun on twisty …
Vauxhall Mokka
VW T-Roc

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,000 - 40,500 £
Price
26,400 - 38,600 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.4 - 18.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
336 - 403 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 129 g/km
co2
126 - 143 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
4 - 5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,294 - 1,672 kg
Curb weight
1,465 - 1,539 kg
Trunk capacity
310 - 350 L
Trunk capacity
284 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,787 mm
Width
1,811 - 1,828 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
388 - 400 kg
Payload
368 - 515 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
136 - 281 HP
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
100 - 207 kW
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
Brand
Vauxhall
Brand
VW
What drive types are available for the Vauxhall Mokka?

The Vauxhall Mokka is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.