Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Qashqai or Skoda Kamiq?
In the world of compact SUVs, the Nissan Qashqai and Skoda Kamiq each offer a compelling mix of features, performance, and style. As 2024 models hit the market, potential buyers face the delightful challenge of choosing between these two standout vehicles. Let's dive into a detailed comparison based on their technical specifications and innovative features.
The Nissan Qashqai is available with a versatile range of engines, including petrol mild hybrid (MHEV) and full hybrid options, catering to both manual and automatic preferences with transmissions such as the CVT and reduction gearbox. The power output varies from 140 to 190 HP, producing a torque between 240 to 330 Nm, depending on the selected model variant. This results in acceleration from 0-100 km/h between 7.9 to 10.2 seconds, making it a versatile performer capable of achieving a maximum speed of up to 206 km/h.
In contrast, the Skoda Kamiq offers a straightforward petrol engine lineup with models to choose from 95 to 150 HP. With a dual-clutch automatic option and manual gearbox, its torque peaks at 250 Nm. The Kamiq's acceleration shows a 0-100 km/h time ranging from 8.3 to 11 seconds and reaches a maximum speed of 214 km/h, ensuring it has the edge on those who favor speed.
The Nissan Qashqai sports a body that's 4425 mm long, 1835 mm wide, and 1625 mm high, which offers a spacious interior with a trunk capacity of up to 504 liters. With seating for five, this makes the Qashqai both family and travel-friendly, suitable for an active lifestyle with remarkable utility.
The Skoda Kamiq, slightly shorter at 4241 mm, 1793 mm in width, and 1562 mm in height, provides 400 liters of trunk capacity. Despite its more compact stature, it ensures a comfortable and functional environment for drivers and passengers alike, with its smart use of space and innovative design features.
The Qashqai achieves fuel consumption figures ranging between 5.1 to 6.8 L/100 km and falls into CO2 efficiency classes D to E. With a fuel tank capacity of 55 liters, it offers a commendable range for long trips.
The Kamiq presents an even more efficient profile, with fuel consumption from 5.4 to 5.7 L/100 km and CO2 output efficiently managed across an impressive array of figures within the class D category. Its 50-liter fuel tank ensures decent range while maintaining sustainable emissions.
Aside from performance, the Nissan Qashqai boasts cutting-edge technology, including advanced driver assistance systems, and a refined interior, which emphasizes user-centered comfort. Available in both front-wheel and all-wheel drive options, it offers flexibility and confidence across various terrains.
The Skoda Kamiq has made its mark with a user-friendly interface, excellent infotainment technology, and signature ‘Simply Clever’ solutions that enhance every drive. It excels in offering a front-wheel drive that balances everyday usability with an engaging driving experience.
Both the Nissan Qashqai and Skoda Kamiq offer their own unique blend of features, making them stand out in the compact SUV segment. The choice between them hinges on individual preferences, with the Qashqai appealing to those who desire more power options and a larger capacity, while the Kamiq is perfect for those who value efficiency, cutting-edge technology, and agile handling.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Skoda Kamiq has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21700 £, while the Nissan Qashqai costs 29600 £. That’s a price difference of around 7894 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Nissan Qashqai manages with 4.50 L and is therefore a bit more efficient than the Skoda Kamiq with 5.30 L. The difference is about 0.80 L per 100 km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Qashqai has a noticeable edge – offering 205 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 55 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Qashqai is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 7.60 s, while the Skoda Kamiq takes 8.10 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kamiq performs slight better – reaching 216 km/h, while the Nissan Qashqai tops out at 206 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Nissan Qashqai pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 330 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 80 Nm difference.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Skoda Kamiq is a bit lighter – 1231 kg compared to 1420 kg. The difference is around 189 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Nissan Qashqai offers noticeable more room – 504 L compared to 400 L. That’s a difference of about 104 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Nissan Qashqai performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1447 L, which is about 52 L more than the Skoda Kamiq.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Kamiq barely noticeable takes the win – 539 kg compared to 520 kg. That’s a difference of about 19 kg.
The Nissan Qashqai proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Nissan Qashqai is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
The Nissan Qashqai blends practical, family-friendly packaging with SUV styling that refuses to shout, making it a sensible and dependable choice for everyday life. It’s comfortable to live with, economical on the road, and neatly equipped enough to feel modern without ever feeling precious — perfect if you want crossover versatility without the drama.
details
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
The Skoda Kamiq is a neatly packaged city crossover that pairs practical space with unshowy, thoughtful design. It’s easy to live with, economical to run and full of clever details that make daily driving feel intelligently sorted rather than flashy.
details
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
|
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
|
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29600 - 39900 £
|
Price
21700 - 31900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
102 - 154 g/km
|
co2
121 - 128 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1420 - 1665 kg
|
Curb weight
1231 - 1340 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
|
Trunk capacity
400 L
|
|
Length
4425 mm
|
Length
4241 mm
|
|
Width
1835 mm
|
Width
1793 mm
|
|
Height
1625 mm
|
Height
1562 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1422 - 1447 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1395 L
|
|
Payload
466 - 520 kg
|
Payload
439 - 539 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 205 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 10.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11 s
|
|
Max Speed
170 - 206 km/h
|
Max Speed
183 - 216 km/h
|
|
Torque
240 - 330 Nm
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 151 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1332 - 1498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España