In the battle of the compact SUVs, the Renault Rafale and Volkswagen Tiguan each showcase their unique strengths. While the Rafale impresses with its bold styling and advanced technology features, the Tiguan offers a more established reputation for reliability and a spacious interior. Ultimately, the choice between these two will depend on whether buyers prioritize innovative design or practicality in their everyday driving experience.
The SUV segment is highly competitive, with many models vying for the top spot in the hearts of consumers. In this article, we’ll explore the Renault Rafale and the VW Tiguan, two distinct contenders that have captured significant attention for their blend of technology, efficiency, and performance. While both vehicles aim to cater to a modern audience, they approach engineering and innovation from different angles.
The Renault Rafale boasts an impressive lineup of hybrid engines, including both full hybrid and plug-in hybrid options, with power outputs of 200 HP and 300 HP respectively. It features a front-wheel drive system and comes equipped with an automatic gearbox, ensuring smooth transitions and an enjoyable driving experience. One of its key highlights is the remarkable fuel consumption, at just 4.7 L/100 km, alongside a CO2 output of only 106 g/km.
On the other hand, the VW Tiguan offers a broader selection of engines, including petrol, diesel, and hybrid options. Power outputs range from 130 HP up to a whopping 272 HP, catering to a diverse range of drivers. Unlike the Rafale, the Tiguan features both front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive configurations, enhancing its versatility. The Tiguan's consumption rates vary but generally hover around 6.1 L/100 km for petrol variants.
An intriguing detail of the Rafale is its electric range, which extends up to 97 km when utilizing the hybrid modes, coupled with a seamless transition between electric and combustion power. This makes it a great choice for urban commutes and short trips without relying on fuel.
The Tiguan, however, defines modern hybrid capability with an electric range of up to 113 km on its plug-in hybrid models. With a battery capacity of 19.7 kWh and comprehensive driving options, the Tiguan provides flexibility for drivers who seek an eco-friendlier option without sacrificing performance.
When it comes to design, both SUVs present unique aesthetics and functionalities. The Renault Rafale stands at 4710 mm in length, with a width of 1886 mm and a height of 1613 mm. Its bold silhouette and contemporary styling make it an eye-catcher on the road. Inside, it comfortably accommodates five passengers and offers a notable trunk capacity of 627 liters, which can be a strong selling point for families or those needing extra cargo space.
In contrast, the VW Tiguan has slightly more compact dimensions, measuring 4539 mm long, 1842 mm wide, and 1658 mm high. Nonetheless, it doesn’t compromise on interior space, offering a trunk capacity of 652 liters. The interior design focuses on sophistication and practicality, akin to many VW models, and the quality of materials used stands out in its class.
Acceleration is another noteworthy aspect of consideration. The Rafale accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in just 8.9 seconds for the hybrid model, while the more potent variant can achieve this in 6.4 seconds. This performance caters to more dynamic drivers who value quick responses and exhilarating drives.
On the other hand, the Tiguan impresses with its nimbleness, particularly in its sportier configurations, achieving 0-100 km/h in as little as 5.9 seconds. It provides an exceptional driving experience equipped with advanced driving assist technologies, ensuring safety and comfort on every journey.
Choosing between the Renault Rafale and VW Tiguan ultimately comes down to individual preferences and needs. The Rafale shines with its hybrid efficiency and stylish design, making it an attractive option for eco-conscious buyers. Meanwhile, the Tiguan’s broader engine lineup, all-wheel drive options, and outstanding performance metrics cater to a segment that values versatility and power. Both models have carved their niche in the competitive SUV market, and prospective buyers would do well to assess their specific requirements against the strengths of each.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 37500 - 49500
£
|
Price
about 32800 - 51000
£
|
Consumption L/100km
0.6 - 4.7
L
|
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 8.5
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
97
km
|
Electric Range
112 - 113
km
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
19.7
kWh
|
co2
14 - 106
g/km
|
co2
8 - 193
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
55
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1728 - 2025
kg
|
Curb weight
1598 - 1890
kg
|
Trunk capacity
539 - 627
L
|
Trunk capacity
490 - 652
L
|
Length
4710
mm
|
Length
4539
mm
|
Width
1886
mm
|
Width
1842 - 1859
mm
|
Height
1613
mm
|
Height
1656 - 1658
mm
|
Payload
415 - 447
kg
|
Payload
467 - 533
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel, Petrol
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automat. Schaltgetriebe (Doppelkupplung)
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
200 - 300
HP
|
Power HP
130 - 272
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 8.9
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 10.6
s
|
Max Speed
180
km/h
|
Max Speed
198 - 242
km/h
|
Torque
-
|
Torque
220 - 400
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Power kW
147 - 221
kW
|
Power kW
96 - 200
kW
|
Engine capacity
1199
cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984
cm3
|
Top speed
180
km/h
|
Top speed
198 - 242
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B, F, G
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
VW
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.