Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Renault Rafale or Skoda Kodiaq?
In the bustling SUV segment, the Renault Rafale and Skoda Kodiaq are two contenders vying for the attention of discerning drivers. Both models boast innovative features and impressive technical specifications, catering to a growing market that craves comfort, efficiency, and performance. Let’s dive into a comparative analysis of these two notable SUVs.
The Renault Rafale showcases a cutting-edge engine lineup with both full and plug-in hybrid options. The full hybrid variant produces a remarkable 200 HP, while the plug-in hybrid version pushes the limit to 300 HP. This provides a significant level of performance, allowing the Rafale to accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in just 6.4 seconds.
On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq offers a range of engine choices, including petrol, diesel, and plug-in hybrid variants. The most powerful option, the petrol engine, boasts an impressive output of 265 HP. With varying performance metrics, it can reach 100 km/h in as quick as 6.3 seconds. However, the Kodiaq's petrol variant consumes more fuel, with an average consumption of up to 8.2 L/100 km compared to the Rafale’s efficient 4.7 L/100 km for hybrids.
The Renault Rafale equips drivers with a smooth automatic gearbox and a front-wheel-drive configuration, ensuring a seamless driving experience. Its design focuses on providing comfort and precision, ideal for urban and highway driving alike.
In contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq features a dual-clutch automatic transmission, providing quick shifts and enhanced driving dynamics. It offers both front-wheel and all-wheel drive configurations, making it versatile for various terrains and driving conditions. This adaptability could be crucial for drivers in regions where weather conditions often change.
When it comes to cabin space, the Rafale comfortably seats five passengers and offers ample trunk capacity at 627 liters, featuring a well-organized layout for practical storage solutions. The dimensions of the Rafale play a significant role in providing a spacious environment for its occupants.
The Kodiaq, slightly larger with a trunk capacity of up to 910 liters, shines in terms of space efficiency. Both vehicles are designed to prioritize passenger comfort without compromising cargo space, but the Kodiaq edges ahead in the luggage department.
Renault has infused the Rafale with modern tech features, focusing on driver convenience and connectivity. Advanced infotainment systems and hybrid-specific driving modes cater to tech-savvy drivers looking for an interactive experience. The electric range of up to 97 km enhances its appeal, making it suitable for short commutes without depending on fossil fuels.
Meanwhile, the Kodiaq is not one to be outdone, incorporating a plethora of advanced safety features and driver assistance systems. It provides electric ranges of about 123 km for its plug-in hybrid variant, effectively minimizing ecological footprints. Skoda’s tech-savvy focus includes smart navigation systems and a seamless infotainment experience.
The Rafale proudly holds a CO2 efficiency class rating of B and C, demonstrating its commitment to reducing emissions with figures reaching as low as 14 g/km for the most efficient models. This makes the Rafale a favorable option for environmentally conscious drivers.
Conversely, the Kodiaq exhibits mixed emissions ratings, ranging from 9 to 186 g/km. It’s essential for buyers to consider which engine and drivetrain they choose, as it impacts the overall environmental footprint of the vehicle.
Pricing will generally vary based on specifications and market conditions. The Renault Rafale is positioned competitively within the hybrid SUV market, while the Kodiaq occupies a broader spectrum, catering to a diverse audience looking for a robust, family-friendly SUV.
Ultimately, the choice between the Renault Rafale and Skoda Kodiaq will depend on individual preferences and requirements. Those seeking a cutting-edge hybrid experience with impressive efficiency may lean towards the Rafale, whereas buyers looking for a versatile, spacious family SUV with various engine options might find the Kodiaq to be their ideal match. Each model brings unique advantages to the table, making both a worthy consideration in the crowded SUV market.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Skoda Kodiaq has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £, while the Renault Rafale costs 37500 £. That’s a price difference of around 694 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 0.40 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Renault Rafale with 0.60 L. The difference is about 0.20 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Skoda Kodiaq performs noticeable better – achieving up to 123 km, about 26 km more than the Renault Rafale.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Renault Rafale has a somewhat edge – offering 300 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 35 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Renault Rafale takes 6.40 s. That’s about 0.10 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs noticeable better – reaching 231 km/h, while the Renault Rafale tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 51 km/h.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is minimal lighter – 1684 kg compared to 1734 kg. The difference is around 50 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers noticeable more room – 910 L compared to 627 L. That’s a difference of about 283 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs hardly perceptible better – up to 2105 L, which is about 195 L more than the Renault Rafale.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Kodiaq noticeable takes the win – 563 kg compared to 444 kg. That’s a difference of about 119 kg.
Overall, the Skoda Kodiaq shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
The Renault Rafale dresses bold coupé-inspired lines around a practical crossover body, turning heads without trying too hard. Inside it serves up a comfortable, well-equipped cabin and engaging driving manners, making it a clever choice for buyers who want a bit of panache with their daily commute.
details
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
|
@ Renault Group Media
|
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
37500 - 49500 £
|
Price
36800 - 49600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
0.6 - 5 L
|
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 8.2 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
97 km
|
Electric Range
113 - 123 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
|
|
co2
14 - 109 g/km
|
co2
9 - 186 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1734 - 2025 kg
|
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
539 - 627 L
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
|
Length
4710 mm
|
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
|
|
Width
1886 mm
|
Width
1864 mm
|
|
Height
1613 mm
|
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1826 - 1910 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1945 - 2105 L
|
|
Payload
415 - 444 kg
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
200 - 300 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 8.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
|
|
Torque
-
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
147 - 221 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, F, G, E
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Skoda
|
The Renault Rafale is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España