Is the Skoda Scala offered with different drivetrains?

The Skoda Scala is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Skoda Scala's engine?

Up to 150 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

How much fuel does the Skoda Scala use?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 5 L.

How big is the Skoda Scala overall?

The Skoda Scala measures 4362 mm long, 1793 mm wide and 1514 mm high.

What drivetrain options does the VW Polo have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the VW Polo?

The VW Polo reaches a peak output of 207 HP, depending on the model.

How much fuel does the VW Polo use?

On average, the VW Polo consumes 5.10 L.

What are the dimensions of the VW Polo?

The VW Polo measures 4074 mm long, 1751 mm wide and 1451 mm high.

Skoda Scala vs VW Polo – Which car gives you more for your money? Specs, differences & prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Scala @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

VW Polo has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 17000 £, while the Skoda Scala costs 20900 £. That’s a price difference of around 3904 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Scala manages with 5 L and is therefore hardly perceptible more efficient than the VW Polo with 5.10 L. The difference is about 0.10 L per 100 km.

Polo @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the VW Polo has a evident edge – offering 207 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 57 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW Polo is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 6.50 s, while the Skoda Scala takes 8.20 s. That’s about 1.70 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the VW Polo performs barely noticeable better – reaching 240 km/h, while the Skoda Scala tops out at 221 km/h. The difference is around 19 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: VW Polo pulls distinct stronger with 320 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm difference.

Scala @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, VW Polo is barely noticeable lighter – 1143 kg compared to 1199 kg. The difference is around 56 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Scala offers evident more room – 467 L compared to 351 L. That’s a difference of about 116 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Scala performs evident better – up to 1410 L, which is about 285 L more than the VW Polo.

When it comes to payload, VW Polo barely noticeable takes the win – 457 kg compared to 431 kg. That’s a difference of about 26 kg.

Who wins the race?

The VW Polo proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
VW Polo is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

Reviews Skoda Scala

5 (2 Reviews)

Reviews VW Polo

Top Car Comparisons

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Fabia

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Scala

VS

Think of the Skoda Fabia as the scrappy city wizard: compact, cheap to run and brilliantly easy to park, while the Skoda Scala feels like an adult hatchback with more space, sharper tech and a calmer, more composed ride. If you want thrift and cheeky agility, go Fabia; if you need room, refinement …

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Kamiq

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Scala

VS

The Skoda Kamiq is a city‑friendly crossover that trades a bit of sportiness for higher seating, clever storage tricks and SUV looks — great if you want practical versatility and a confident view of the road. The Skoda Scala, meanwhile, is the sharper, more car‑like hatchback with better driving …

Costs and Consumption
Price 20900 - 30700 £	Price 17000 - 30400 £
Consumption L/100km 5 - 5.6 L	Consumption L/100km 5.1 - 6.5 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 114 - 126 g/km	co2 116 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 50 L	Fuel tank capacity 40 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type Hatchback	Body Type Hatchback
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1199 - 1271 kg	Curb weight 1143 - 1378 kg
Trunk capacity 467 L	Trunk capacity 351 L
Length 4362 mm	Length 4074 mm
Width 1793 mm	Width 1751 mm
Height 1514 mm	Height 1431 - 1451 mm
Max trunk capacity 1410 L	Max trunk capacity 1125 L
Payload 403 - 431 kg	Payload 432 - 457 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol	Engine Type Petrol
Transmission Manuel, Automatic	Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic	Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 95 - 150 HP	Power HP 80 - 207 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.2 - 10.8 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 6.5 - 15.6 s
Max Speed 192 - 221 km/h	Max Speed 171 - 240 km/h
Torque 175 - 250 Nm	Torque 93 - 320 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3 - 4	Number of Cylinders 3 - 4
Power kW 70 - 110 kW	Power kW 59 - 152 kW
Engine capacity 999 - 1498 cm3	Engine capacity 999 - 1984 cm3