VS

SsangYong Rexton vs Mercedes C Class Sedan comparison

Compare performance (202 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (41,100 £ vs 41,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – SsangYong Rexton or Mercedes C Class Sedan?

SsangYong Rexton vs Mercedes C Class Sedan: Key differences

SsangYong Rexton

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly cheaper
  • substantially more trunk space
details

Mercedes C Class Sedan

  • considerably more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Rexton

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

SsangYong Rexton is very slightly cheaper – starting at 41,100 £ , while the Mercedes C Class Sedan costs 41,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 191 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mercedes C Class Sedan uses 4.5 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the SsangYong Rexton with 8.2 L/100km. The difference is about 3.7 L/100km.

C Class Sedan

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes C Class Sedan offers considerably more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 202 HP. That’s roughly 478 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes C Class Sedan is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.4 s, while the SsangYong Rexton takes 10.6 s. That’s about 7.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes C Class Sedan delivers significantly more torque with 1,020 Nm compared to 441 Nm. That’s about 579 Nm more.

Rexton

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: SsangYong Rexton offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mercedes C Class Sedan is noticeably lighter – 1,695 kg compared to 2,145 kg. The difference is around 450 kg.

Looking at boot space, the SsangYong Rexton offers substantially more boot space – 784 L compared to 455 L. That’s a difference of about 329 L.

When it comes to payload, the SsangYong Rexton carries markedly more – 770 kg compared to 570 kg. That’s a difference of about 200 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes C Class Sedan is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £41,300
C Class Sedan

Mercedes C Class Sedan

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 183 - 680 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.5 - 9 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 11 km
SsangYong Rexton
Mercedes C Class Sedan

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

SsangYong Rexton

The SsangYong Rexton is a no-nonsense full-size SUV that pairs rugged, go-anywhere bones with a surprisingly plush cabin, making it an appealing choice for buyers who want capability without premium-brand prices. It won’t turn heads like a luxury badge, but its generous space, sensible features and honest practicality make it a smart, down-to-earth family hauler — a savvy pick if you value substance over status.

details

Mercedes C Class Sedan

The Mercedes C‑Class is the compact executive that dresses like it owns the boulevard, with an interior that blends modern elegance and plush comfort to make everyday driving feel unexpectedly special. On the road it pairs poise with a hint of cheeky agility, rewarding drivers who want refinement without forfeiting a touch of fun — and yes, it still looks great in the driveway.

details
SsangYong Rexton
Mercedes C Class Sedan

Costs and Consumption

Price
41,100 - 51,300 £
Price
41,300 - 103,400 £
Consumption L/100km
8.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
11 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
214 - 216 g/km
co2
119 - 205 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Off-Roader
Body Type
Sedan
Seats
5 - 7
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,145 - 2,180 kg
Curb weight
1,695 - 2,165 kg
Trunk capacity
236 - 784 L
Trunk capacity
455 L
Length
4,850 mm
Length
-
Width
1,960 mm
Width
1,820 - 1,900 mm
Height
1,825 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,806 - 1,977 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
655 - 770 kg
Payload
485 - 570 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
202 HP
Power HP
183 - 680 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.4 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
184 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
441 Nm
Torque
250 - 1,020 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
148 kW
Power kW
135 - 500 kW
Engine capacity
2,157 cm3
Engine capacity
1,496 - 1,999 cm3

General

Model Year
2,021 - 2,023
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, G
Brand
SsangYong
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.