Compare performance (320 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (43,300 £ vs 35,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – VW Arteon or Skoda Superb Limousine?
Two giants in the automotive world, the Skoda Superb Limousine and the VW Arteon, are renowned for their elegance and technical prowess. Offering a blend of performance, technology, and luxury, these vehicles set the standard in their segments. As they vie for supremacy, let's dive into the specifics that set them apart.
On the surface, both the Skoda Superb Limousine and the VW Arteon present themselves with strikingly sophisticated designs, yet they cater to different aesthetic preferences. The Superb Limousine embodies a classic Sedan body type, while the Arteon is distinct with its sleek Wagon silhouette. In terms of dimensions, the Superb measures at 4902 to 4912 mm in length, 1849 mm in width, and stands tall at 1511 to 1481 mm, offering a dominant presence. The Arteon, on the other hand, spans 4866 mm in length and is slightly wider at 1871 mm, although it maintains a lower profile with heights between 1434 and 1451 mm.
Under the hood, both vehicles offer a breadth of engine options, each with unique performance capabilities. The Superb Limousine impresses with its versatile engine types, including Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Petrol, and Plugin Hybrid, providing outputs ranging from 150 to 265 HP. It features a Dual-Clutch Automatic transmission available in both Front-Wheel and All-Wheel Drive configurations. Notably, its acceleration sees the 0-100 km/h mark in 5.6 to 9.2 seconds, showcasing a spectrum of performance suited to various needs.
The Arteon, staying true to VW's commitment to performance, offers Diesel and Petrol engine options with outputs from 150 to an impressive 320 HP. Its 4.9-second acceleration to 100 km/h emphasizes its potent sports-oriented character. The Arteon, too, employs a Dual-Clutch Automatic and provides an All-Wheel Drive setup to enhance driving dynamics.
In terms of fuel consumption, the Skoda Superb Limousine provides an efficient ride with consumption figures ranging from 4.9 to 7.8 L/100km. Hybrid enthusiasts will appreciate the Plugin Hybrid's electric range of up to 137 km and its competitive CO2 emissions as low as 8 g/km.
The VW Arteon decides in favor of performance but still manages to deliver efficient consumption rates between 5.1 to 8.6 L/100km. With CO2 emissions managing to maintain a range from 135 to 195 g/km, the Arteon strikes a balance between performance aspirations and ecological concerns.
Both vehicles accommodate up to 5 passengers, ensuring ample comfort for driver and occupants alike. Skoda once again demonstrates its mastery of practicality with a substantial trunk capacity of 645 to 486 liters, perfect for long journeys. The Arteon's 590-liter trunk is notably spacious, catering to those requiring everyday versatility.
Both the Skoda Superb Limousine and the VW Arteon excel in delivering a compelling mix of luxury, performance, and technology. The choice ultimately hinges on personal preference: Skoda's larger payload and extraordinary trunk space or VW's athletic flair and remarkable acceleration. Regardless of choice, drivers can expect a premium experience from both of these exceptional contenders.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Skoda Superb Limousine is noticeably cheaper – starting at 35,100 £ , while the VW Arteon costs 43,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,224 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Superb Limousine uses 1.2 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the VW Arteon with 5.1 L/100km. The difference is about 3.9 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the VW Arteon offers somewhat more power – delivering 320 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 55 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW Arteon is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Skoda Superb Limousine takes 5.6 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the VW Arteon is marginally faster – reaching 250 km/h, while the Skoda Superb Limousine tops out at 248 km/h. The difference is around 2 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the VW Arteon delivers barely more torque with 420 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 20 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Superb Limousine is marginally lighter – 1,559 kg compared to 1,607 kg. The difference is around 48 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Superb Limousine offers only slightly more boot space – 645 L compared to 590 L. That’s a difference of about 55 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Skoda Superb Limousine offers marginally more capacity – up to 1,795 L, about 163 L more than the VW Arteon.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Superb Limousine carries marginally more – 580 kg compared to 569 kg. That’s a difference of about 11 kg.
The Skoda Superb Limousine is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The VW Arteon cuts a fastback silhouette that manages to look more expensive than it is, with a cabin that feels calm, roomy and smartly finished. It blends relaxed long distance comfort with a touch of sporting poise, making it a clever choice for buyers who want grand touring polish without shouting for attention.
details
The Skoda Superb is the quietly imposing saloon that turns everyday practicality into tasteful luxury, with a roomy, well-thought-out cabin and a boot that swallows groceries and luggage with military discipline. For buyers who want executive presence without the badge snobbery, it’s a clever, polished choice that rewards sensible thinking with genuine comfort and pragmatic charm.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
43,300 - 60,800 £
|
Price
35,100 - 51,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 8.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.2 - 7.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
132 - 140 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
133 - 195 g/km
|
co2
26 - 175 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
66 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
66 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Estate
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,607 - 1,773 kg
|
Curb weight
1,559 - 1,849 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
590 L
|
Trunk capacity
486 - 645 L
|
|
Length
4,866 mm
|
Length
4,912 mm
|
|
Width
1,871 mm
|
Width
1,849 mm
|
|
Height
1,434 - 1,451 mm
|
Height
1,481 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,632 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,795 L
|
|
Payload
467 - 569 kg
|
Payload
485 - 580 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 320 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 9.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.6 - 9.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
216 - 250 km/h
|
Max Speed
248 km/h
|
|
Torque
320 - 420 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 235 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,968 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, F, B
|
|
Brand
VW
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España