Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alpine A290 vs Maxus Mifa 9 – Which model is better for everyday use?
Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A290 or Maxus Mifa 9?
A290
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Alpine A290 has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £, while the Maxus Mifa 9 costs 59100 £. That’s a price difference of around 25963 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Alpine A290: with 15.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s evident more efficient than the Maxus Mifa 9 with 21.30 kWh. That’s a difference of about 5.50 kWh.
As for range, the Maxus Mifa 9 performs a bit better – achieving up to 440 km, about 60 km more than the Alpine A290.
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Maxus Mifa 9 has a somewhat edge – offering 245 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 27 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A290 is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 6.40 s, while the Maxus Mifa 9 takes 8.90 s. That’s about 2.50 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Maxus Mifa 9 performs minimal better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Maxus Mifa 9 pulls slightly stronger with 350 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Maxus Mifa 9 offers evident more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Alpine A290 is clearly lighter – 1479 kg compared to 2385 kg. The difference is around 906 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Maxus Mifa 9 offers clearly perceptible more room – 466 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 140 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Maxus Mifa 9 performs decisively better – up to 2017 L, which is about 911 L more than the Alpine A290.
When it comes to payload, Maxus Mifa 9 distinct takes the win – 615 kg compared to 471 kg. That’s a difference of about 144 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Alpine A290 shows itself to be shows small but notable strengths and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £33,200
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Alpine A290
Alpine A290
The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.
details
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Maxus Mifa 9
The Maxus Mifa 9 stands out as a remarkable contender within the realm of electric vehicles, offering a sophisticated design that marries style with functionality. Its spacious interior is crafted with premium materials, providing both comfort and a sense of luxury for passengers. With an emphasis on cutting-edge technology, this vehicle delivers an impressive driving experience that pairs efficiency with performance.
details
Alpine A290
Maxus Mifa 9
|
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33200 - 39600 £
|
Price
59100 - 71100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
21.3 - 21.8 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
|
Electric Range
430 - 440 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
MPV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
7
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1479 kg
|
Curb weight
2385 - 2610 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 L
|
Trunk capacity
466 L
|
|
Length
3997 mm
|
Length
5270 mm
|
|
Width
1823 mm
|
Width
2000 mm
|
|
Height
1512 mm
|
Height
1840 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2017 L
|
|
Payload
471 kg
|
Payload
485 - 615 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
245 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 9.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
350 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
180 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2023
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
Maxus
|
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.