VS

Alpine A290 vs Volvo EX30 – Which one offers the better deal?

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A290 or Volvo EX30?

A290 @ media.alpinecars.com

Electric Warriors: Alpine A290 vs. Volvo EX30

The world of electric vehicles is buzzing with the arrival of two remarkable models: the Alpine A290 and the Volvo EX30. These two cars not only promise eco-friendliness but also pack a punch in terms of performance and innovation. Let’s delve into what makes each of these electric titans standout.

EX30 @ Volvo

Design and Body Type

The Alpine A290 embraces the stylish hatchback design, appealing to those who prefer a compact, urban-friendly vehicle. With a length of 3997 mm, width of 1823 mm, and height of 1512 mm, it’s tailored for nimble city driving while offering ample space with its 5-door configuration.

In contrast, the Volvo EX30 stands as an SUV, designed for those who crave additional space and a commanding road presence. It measures 4233 mm in length, 1837 mm in width, and swings between 1549 and 1567 mm in height, accommodating diverse lifestyles with its robust 5-door build.

Performance and Power

Power is where both these cars shine, albeit differently. The Alpine A290 offers two power options: a 177 HP and a 218 HP engine. Its front-wheel drive delivers a spirited acceleration from 0-100 km/h in either 7.4 or 6.4 seconds, depending on the variant.

The Volvo EX30, however, ups the ante with its rear-wheel and all-wheel drive variants. Power outputs range from 272 HP to a whopping 428 HP, propelling the car from 0-100 km/h in as fast as 3.6 seconds. The EX30’s focus on rapid acceleration and speed is reflected in its impressive torque figures—343 Nm to 543 Nm.

Drive Range and Efficiency

Both vehicles excel in offering competitive electric ranges, making them ideal for both city commutes and longer adventures. The Alpine A290 provides an electric range of up to 378 km, ensuring fewer charging stops with its efficiency ratings of 15.9 to 16.6 kWh/100km.

The Volvo EX30 boasts an even broader range, with its variants covering between 339 km and 476 km per charge. Its consumption figures—17 to 18.7 kWh/100km—highlight its balance of power and efficiency, aligning perfectly with environmental concerns.

Innovations and Technologies

In terms of innovation, the Alpine A290 offers a seamless and efficient driving experience through its automatic transmission with a reduction gearbox. Its compact size does not compromise on cutting-edge technology, featuring advanced electronics and connectivity options aimed at urban drivers.

The Volvo EX30, on the other hand, is crafted for tech-savvy enthusiasts. It’s equipped with advanced autonomous driving support and safety systems, including the latest in connectivity and infotainment options. The use of dual-motor technology in its all-wheel-drive version marks a significant leap in performance capabilities.

Conclusion

The Alpine A290 and Volvo EX30 both redefine what electric vehicles offer in their respective segments—a hatchback for those seeking the sleek and compact, and an SUV for those who desire power and space. Both are eco-conscious choices with zero CO2 emissions. The ultimate decision lies in personal preference: the sleek and nimble drive of the A290 versus the robust power and range of the EX30. Whichever you choose, electric driving has never looked so promising.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Volvo EX30 has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33000 £, while the Alpine A290 costs 33200 £. That’s a price difference of around 180 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Alpine A290: with 15.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s hardly perceptible more efficient than the Volvo EX30 with 17 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.20 kWh.

As for range, the Volvo EX30 performs evident better – achieving up to 476 km, about 96 km more than the Alpine A290.

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX30 has a convincingly edge – offering 428 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 210 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX30 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.60 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 2.80 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Volvo EX30 performs slight better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo EX30 pulls significantly stronger with 543 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 243 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Alpine A290 is noticeable lighter – 1479 kg compared to 1840 kg. The difference is around 361 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Alpine A290 offers slight more room – 326 L compared to 318 L. That’s a difference of about 8 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Alpine A290 performs minimal better – up to 1106 L, which is about 106 L more than the Volvo EX30.

When it comes to payload, Alpine A290 somewhat takes the win – 471 kg compared to 390 kg. That’s a difference of about 81 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Volvo EX30 shows itself to be dominates this comparison and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £33,000
313302_Volvo_EX30

Volvo EX30

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 272 - 428 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17 - 18.7 kWh
  • Electric Range : 339 - 476 km
details

Alpine A290

The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.

details
alpinea290 @ media.alpinecars.com

Volvo EX30

The Volvo EX30 represents a bold step forward for the brand, combining advanced technology with sustainable design principles. Its sleek and compact exterior belies a spacious interior that offers a premium driving experience. With a focus on safety and innovation, this model reflects Volvo's commitment to shaping the future of urban mobility.

details
313302_Volvo_EX30 @ Volvo
313320_Volvo_EX30 @ Volvo
313329_Volvo_EX30_interior @ Volvo
313334_Volvo_EX30_interior @ Volvo
313297_Volvo_EX30 @ Volvo

Similar Comparisons

Renault R5
Volvo EX30
VS
The Renault 5 brings playful retro charm and clever city-sized packaging, while the Volvo EX30 feels like a pocket rocket from the future with serious EV range and safety tech. If you want personality and urban thrift go R5, but if you crave rapid electric shove, cutting-edge gadgets and peace-of-mind crashworthiness, the EX30 is the smarter, faster pick.
Volvo EX30
VW ID.3
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Volvo EX30 and the VW ID.3, each electric vehicle showcases its own unique strengths. The EX30 impresses with its Scandinavian design and advanced safety features, while the ID.3 highlights its spacious interior and impressive range for everyday driving. Ultimately, both models cater to eco-conscious consumers, but their differing philosophies make them appealing to varied tastes in the EV market.
Alpine A290
Volvo EX30
A290
EX30

Costs and Consumption
Price
33200 - 39600 £
Price
33000 - 49100 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
17 - 18.7 kWh
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
Electric Range
339 - 476 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
49 - 65 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1479 kg
Curb weight
1840 - 1960 kg
Trunk capacity
326 L
Trunk capacity
318 L
Length
3997 mm
Length
4233 mm
Width
1823 mm
Width
1838 mm
Height
1512 mm
Height
1550 - 1567 mm
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
Max trunk capacity
1000 L
Payload
471 kg
Payload
370 - 390 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
-
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
Power HP
272 - 428 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.6 - 5.7 s
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
Torque
343 - 543 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
Power kW
200 - 315 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Alpine
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

Ford Explorer EV
Volvo EX30
VS
In the rapidly evolving electric SUV market, the Ford Explorer EV stands out with its roomy interior and robust performance, making it a strong contender for families on the go. In contrast, the Volvo EX30 emphasizes safety and sustainability, combining cutting-edge technology with a compact design that appeals to urban drivers. Both models showcase the future of electric mobility, but each caters to distinct lifestyles and preferences.
Volvo EX30
Volvo EX40
VS
In the rapidly growing electric vehicle market, the Volvo EX30 and EX40 stand out with their unique blend of style and sustainability. While the EX30 offers a smaller, more urban-friendly footprint, the EX40 boasts additional space and features tailored for family-oriented drivers. Both models showcase Volvo's commitment to safety and innovation, making them compelling choices for environmentally conscious consumers.
Volvo EX30
Kia EV4 Hatchback
VS
Alpine A290
CUPRA Born
VS
Alpine A290
Renault R5
VS
In the exciting showdown between the Alpine A290 and the iconic Renault R5, enthusiasts are treated to a fascinating blend of modern engineering and classic charm. The A290 boasts cutting-edge performance and advanced technology, while the R5 captivates with its nostalgic allure and timeless design. This comparison highlights the evolution of automotive innovation, showcasing how both models cater to different tastes within the vibrant hatchback segment.
Volvo EX30
Volvo XC40
VS
Volvo EX30
Skoda Elroq
VS
The Volvo EX30 and Skoda Elroq present a compelling contrast in the burgeoning electric SUV market, combining efficiency with distinct brand philosophies. While the EX30 emphasizes Scandinavian design and cutting-edge safety features, the Elroq offers a more rugged appeal with practicality and competitive pricing. Ultimately, buyers will find that both models cater to different lifestyles, making the choice a matter of personal preference rather than performance alone.
CUPRA Born
Volvo EX30
VS
In the battle of electric compacts, the CUPRA Born and Volvo EX30 each bring unique strengths to the table for eco-conscious drivers. The CUPRA Born impresses with its sporty design and dynamic handling, making it an ideal choice for those seeking a spirited drive. On the other hand, the Volvo EX30 offers Scandinavian sleekness and cutting-edge safety features, providing peace of mind and comfort in a stylish package.
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.