VS

Alfa Romeo Junior vs Alpine A290 comparison

Compare performance (280 HP vs 218 HP), boot space and price (26,100 £ vs 33,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alfa Romeo Junior or Alpine A290?

Alfa Romeo Junior vs Alpine A290: Key differences

Alfa Romeo Junior

4.9 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • visibly more power
  • marginally more efficient
  • barely more electric range
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat lighter
  • markedly more trunk space
details

Alpine A290

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Junior

The Battle of the New Age Rides: Alfa Romeo Junior vs. Alpine A290

The automotive industry is witnessing a spirited duel between two stalwarts, the Alfa Romeo Junior and the Alpine A290. These two vehicles epitomize modernity, swathed in innovation both in design and performance. As the demand for electric and hybrid technologies escalates, the Junior and A290 present themselves as compelling options. Let's delve deeper into their unique attributes, technical specifications, and innovations that set them apart in the modern automotive arena.

A290

Design and Dimensions: The Balance of Elegance and Compactness

Alfa Romeo's offering, the Junior, encases the boldness typical of an SUV within its adaptive body. With a length of 4173 mm, a width of 1781 mm, and a height ranging from 1533 to 1538 mm, it exudes a mix of spaciousness and commanding road presence. The Alpine A290, on the other hand, captures the spirit of a hatchback with a length of 3997 mm, width of 1823 mm, and a more compact height of 1512 mm. Despite the differences in size, both vehicles maintain a blend of form and functionality.

Junior

Powertrain and Efficiency: Future-Ready Engines

The Alfa Romeo Junior offers a choice between electric and hybrid engine types, complemented by either a reduction gearbox or a dual-clutch automatic transmission. Power outputs range from 136 HP to 280 HP, with front-wheel and all-wheel drive options. The electric variant impresses with a range of up to 410 km, while boasting an economy of 15.2-19 kWh/100km, affirming its efficiency credentials.

Comparatively, the Alpine A290 stands strong with its electric-only powertrain, delivering a range between 361 and 378 km. Its propulsion system provides up to 218 HP, setting a high standard in performance. The A290 is efficient too, with consumption figures between 15.9-16.6 kWh/100km, positioning it as an eco-friendly alternative in the hatchback segment.

Performance and Driving Dynamics

The Junior SUV is an adept performer with 0-100 km/h acceleration ranging from 5.9 to 9.1 seconds, depending on the variant and style. It strikes a fine balance between everyday usability and dynamic driving. Its maximum speed peaks at 206 km/h, underlining its capabilities on highways.

The Alpine A290 does not shy away from delivering exhilarating rides either. With a faster 0-100 km/h acceleration, taking between 6.4 and 7.4 seconds, coupled with a top speed of 170 km/h, it’s built for spirited drive enthusiasts who value agility and swift performance.

Interior Space and Practicality

In terms of interior space, the Alfa Romeo Junior enhances the SUV's reputation for practicality, boasting a trunk capacity of up to 415 liters, making it ideal for those with substantial cargo needs. Its design allows for a comfortable seating arrangement for five passengers, ensuring a pleasant journey regardless of distance.

The A290 features a 326-liter trunk, fitting neatly into the compact car category while still providing adequate storage for daily necessities. Its seating configuration matches the Junior's, making it perfect for small families and urban commuters who appreciate efficient design without sacrificing passenger comfort.

Conclusion: Choosing the Right Companion

In this showdown of souped-up rivals, choosing between the Alfa Romeo Junior and the Alpine A290 boils down to individual preferences and priorities. The Junior's versatility and powerful hybrid options make it a superb pick for those looking for diversity in powertrains and practicality in design. Conversely, the Alpine A290 embodies future-focused electric mobility with a flair for performance, attracting those who seek an exciting drive wrapped up in sustainability.

Ultimately, both cars symbolize the evolution of automobile design and technology, carving a path for the future of the industry. Their distinct attributes make them frontrunners in their respective segments, promising a seamless blend of style, performance, and innovation.

Frequently compared as well

Alpine A290
Renault R5
VS
The Alpine A290 is the sharpened, slightly posher take on the same small‑car bones — think keener handling, a firmer chassis and a price that winks “premium.” The Renault 5, by contrast, is the cheeky everyday charmer: more affordable, practical and easygoing, so if you want smiles without a second …
Alpine A290
CUPRA Born
VS
The Alpine A290 and CUPRA Born go toe-to-toe as compact electric hatchbacks, each prioritising sporty design and engaging driving dynamics. This comparison looks at performance, range, interior quality and everyday practicality to help you decide which better fits your needs.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Junior

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Alfa Romeo Junior is noticeably cheaper – starting at 26,100 £ , while the Alpine A290 costs 33,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,071 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Alfa Romeo Junior is marginally more efficient: consuming 15.1 kWh/100km compared to 15.8 kWh/100km for the Alpine A290. That’s a difference of about 0.7 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Alfa Romeo Junior offers barely more range – reaching up to 410 km, about 30 km more than the Alpine A290.

A290

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Alfa Romeo Junior offers visibly more power – delivering 280 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 62 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alfa Romeo Junior is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 5.9 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.4 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Alfa Romeo Junior delivers a bit more torque with 345 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 45 Nm more.

Junior

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Alfa Romeo Junior is somewhat lighter – 1,380 kg compared to 1,554 kg. The difference is around 174 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Alfa Romeo Junior offers markedly more boot space – 415 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 89 L.

When it comes to payload, the Alfa Romeo Junior carries barely more – 420 kg compared to 396 kg. That’s a difference of about 24 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Alfa Romeo Junior holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £26,100
Junior

Alfa Romeo Junior

  • Engine Type Electric, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 146 - 280 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.8 - 5.4 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.1 - 17.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 344 - 410 km
details
Alfa Romeo Junior
Alpine A290

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Alfa Romeo Junior

The Alfa Romeo Junior captures the essence of Italian design with its sleek lines and compact dimensions, making it an icon of elegance and performance. With a spirited driving experience and a charming retro aesthetic, it appeals to enthusiasts and casual drivers alike. This delightful car embodies the brand's rich heritage while remaining a fun and engaging option for those seeking a unique automotive experience.

details
AlfaRomeoJunior-Exterieur
AlfaRomeoJunior-Exterieur
AlfaRomeoJunior-Interieur

Reviews Alfa Romeo Junior

4.9 (7 Reviews)
rate
Jerzy
9 May 2026, 04:07:35

The car is a pleasure to drive — you don't want to get out. The navigation guides excellently, but Polish names are mispronounced. The car doesn't have cornering lights. The matrix headlights are very good.

Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Alpine A290

The Alpine A290 brings Alpine's racing-bred spirit to the road with taut handling, razor-sharp steering and a compact, cheeky silhouette that's impossible to ignore. It's a car for drivers who want pure fun rather than family practicality — a playful, stylish pocket rocket that makes every back road feel like a racetrack and hands out smiles with the key.

details
alpinea290

Reviews Alpine A290

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
Emin Molu
17 Apr 2026, 21:05:51

excellent handling, excellent damping, excellent noise supression, excellent design.fantastic fun to drive.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Alfa Romeo Junior
Alfa Romeo Tonale
VS
Here’s a concise head-to-head: the Alfa Romeo Junior, a vintage compact coupe prized for its lightness and analogue driving character, versus the Alfa Romeo Tonale, Alfa’s contemporary compact SUV focused on technology, comfort and efficiency. We’ll compare driving feel, practicality, running costs …
Alfa Romeo Junior
Lexus LBX
VS
The Alfa Romeo Junior charms with vintage Italian flair, razor-sharp steering and pure analogue drama — it’s for drivers who buy emotion first and practicality maybe later. The Lexus LBX, by contrast, is composed, tech-rich and absurdly sensible: a compact, efficient urban crossover for buyers who …
Alfa Romeo Junior
Jeep Avenger
VS
Comparing the Alfa Romeo Junior and the Jeep Avenger pits a classic, driver-focused Italian coupe against a contemporary, city-sized crossover built for everyday practicality. If you value vintage charisma and engaging steering, the Junior is instantly appealing; if you prefer modern safety, …
Alfa Romeo Junior
Peugeot 2008
VS
In the latest comparison of compact SUVs, the Alfa Romeo Junior stands out with its striking design and sporty handling, making it a compelling choice for enthusiasts. On the other hand, the Peugeot 2008 offers a more practical approach, featuring a comfortable interior and advanced technology that …
Alfa Romeo Junior
Opel Mokka
VS
In this head-to-head comparison, the Alfa Romeo Junior showcases its sporty flair and Italian design, drawing attention with its bold lines and dynamic performance. Meanwhile, the Opel Mokka offers practicality and a comfortable ride, appealing to those seeking a versatile compact SUV with modern …
Alfa Romeo Junior
Peugeot 208
VS
The Alfa Romeo Junior and Peugeot 208 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Alpine A290
CUPRA Raval
VS
Alpine A290 and CUPRA Raval go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Alfa Romeo Junior
Ford Puma
VS
The Alfa Romeo Junior offers a stylish blend of Italian design and spirited performance, appealing to enthusiasts looking for a dynamic driving experience. In contrast, the Ford Puma impresses with its practicality and advanced technology features, making it a versatile choice for everyday use. …
Alfa Romeo Junior
Alpine A290

Costs and Consumption
Price
26,100 - 41,600 £
Price
33,200 - 39,600 £
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 5.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 - 17.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
344 - 410 km
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 119 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,380 - 1,689 kg
Curb weight
1,554 kg
Trunk capacity
340 - 415 L
Trunk capacity
326 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,781 mm
Width
1,820 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
390 - 420 kg
Payload
396 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
146 - 280 HP
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
107 - 207 kW
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Alfa Romeo
Brand
Alpine
What drivetrain options does the Alfa Romeo Junior have?

The Alfa Romeo Junior is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.