@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
VS

Alpine A290 vs Mercedes EQS SUV – Which car suits you better?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Alpine A290 or Mercedes EQS SUV?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Alpine A290 has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £, while the Mercedes EQS SUV costs 95000 £. That’s a price difference of around 61801 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Alpine A290: with 15.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s distinct more efficient than the Mercedes EQS SUV with 19.60 kWh. That’s a difference of about 3.80 kWh.

As for range, the Mercedes EQS SUV performs clearly better – achieving up to 695 km, about 315 km more than the Alpine A290.

EQS SUV @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQS SUV has a convincingly edge – offering 658 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 440 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQS SUV is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.40 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 2 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mercedes EQS SUV performs a bit better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mercedes EQS SUV pulls clearly stronger with 950 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 650 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Alpine A290 is significantly lighter – 1479 kg compared to 2695 kg. The difference is around 1216 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mercedes EQS SUV offers clearly more room – 645 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 319 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mercedes EQS SUV performs decisively better – up to 2100 L, which is about 994 L more than the Alpine A290.

When it comes to payload, Mercedes EQS SUV to a small extent takes the win – 570 kg compared to 471 kg. That’s a difference of about 99 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mercedes EQS SUV proves to be wins the duel decisively and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mercedes EQS SUV is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £95,000
EQS SUV @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media

Mercedes EQS SUV

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 360 - 658 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 19.6 - 21.9 kWh
  • Electric Range : 615 - 695 km

Alpine A290

5 (1)
rate

The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.

details

Mercedes EQS SUV

The Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV redefines luxury in the electric vehicle segment with its elegant design and cutting-edge technology. Its spacious interior provides exceptional comfort, featuring high-quality materials and innovative ambient lighting to create a serene driving environment. This SUV impressively combines sustainability with performance, offering a smooth and quiet ride without compromising on power.

details
Alpine A290
Mercedes EQS SUV
A290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media
EQS SUV @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media

Costs and Consumption

Price
33200 - 39600 £
Price
95000 - 212100 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
19.6 - 21.9 kWh
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
Electric Range
615 - 695 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
108.4 - 118 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
4 - 5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1479 kg
Curb weight
2695 - 3075 kg
Trunk capacity
326 L
Trunk capacity
440 - 645 L
Length
3997 mm
Length
5125 mm
Width
1823 mm
Width
1959 - 2034 mm
Height
1512 mm
Height
1718 - 1721 mm
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
Max trunk capacity
2100 L
Payload
471 kg
Payload
425 - 570 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
-
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
Power HP
360 - 658 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 6.8 s
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
Max Speed
210 km/h
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
Torque
568 - 950 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
Power kW
265 - 484 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Alpine
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.