Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alpine A290 vs Mercedes EQT – Differences & prices compared
Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A290 or Mercedes EQT?
A290
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mercedes EQT has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 27800 £, while the Alpine A290 costs 33200 £. That’s a price difference of around 5397 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Alpine A290: with 15.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s noticeable more efficient than the Mercedes EQT with 19.50 kWh. That’s a difference of about 3.70 kWh.
As for range, the Alpine A290 performs evident better – achieving up to 380 km, about 102 km more than the Mercedes EQT.
EQT
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Alpine A290 has a convincingly edge – offering 218 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 96 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A290 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.40 s, while the Mercedes EQT takes 12.60 s. That’s about 6.20 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Alpine A290 performs distinct better – reaching 170 km/h, while the Mercedes EQT tops out at 132 km/h. The difference is around 38 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Alpine A290 pulls slightly stronger with 300 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 55 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Alpine A290 is distinct lighter – 1479 kg compared to 1925 kg. The difference is around 446 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mercedes EQT offers significantly more room – 551 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 225 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mercedes EQT performs clearly better – up to 1979 L, which is about 873 L more than the Alpine A290.
When it comes to payload, Mercedes EQT to a small extent takes the win – 531 kg compared to 471 kg. That’s a difference of about 60 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Alpine A290 shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £33,200
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Alpine A290
Alpine A290
The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.
details
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Mercedes EQT
The Mercedes-Benz EQT represents a new chapter in the world of electric vehicles, seamlessly combining elegance with practicality. Its interior offers a sophisticated design, featuring premium materials and advanced technology to ensure a comfortable driving experience. On the road, the EQT impresses with its smooth handling and efficient electric powertrain, making it a strong contender in the growing market of eco-friendly family cars.
details
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
Alpine A290
Mercedes EQT
|
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
|
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33200 - 39600 £
|
Price
27800 - 32100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.5 - 20.8 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
|
Electric Range
265 - 278 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1479 kg
|
Curb weight
1925 - 2023 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 L
|
Trunk capacity
242 - 551 L
|
|
Length
3997 mm
|
Length
4498 - 4922 mm
|
|
Width
1823 mm
|
Width
1859 mm
|
|
Height
1512 mm
|
Height
1819 - 1830 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1979 L
|
|
Payload
471 kg
|
Payload
457 - 531 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.60 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
132 km/h
|
|
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
245 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2023 - 2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.