Compare performance (400 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (27,000 £ vs 67,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi A3 Sportback or Ford Transit Transporter?
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Audi A3 Sportback is substantially cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 40,309 £.
As for electric range, the Ford Transit Transporter offers considerably more range – reaching up to 402 km, about 261 km more than the Audi A3 Sportback.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi A3 Sportback offers markedly more power – delivering 400 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 131 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi A3 Sportback delivers moderately more torque with 500 Nm compared to 430 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
The Audi A3 Sportback leads convincingly in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Audi A3 Sportback wraps premium materials and crisp German design into a practical hatchback package that makes daily driving feel smart rather than showy. It’s nimble in the city, composed on longer trips, and carries just enough swagger to satisfy buyers who want quality without shouting about it.
detailsThe Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27,000 - 92,900 £
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.1 - 9.3 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
134 - 141 km
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
25 - 211 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,360 - 1,685 kg
|
Curb weight
-
|
|
Trunk capacity
280 - 380 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,816 - 1,851 mm
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
410 - 480 kg
|
Payload
-
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 400 HP
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 10.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
220 - 500 Nm
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 5
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
85 - 294 kW
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 2,480 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, F, E, G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Ford
|