Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Audi A3 Sportback vs Land Rover Range Rover comparison
Compare performance (400 HP vs 615 HP), boot space and price (27,000 £ vs 122,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi A3 Sportback or Land Rover Range Rover?
A3 Sportback
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Audi A3 Sportback is considerably cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover costs 122,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 95,742 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi A3 Sportback uses 1.1 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover with 2.7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.6 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Audi A3 Sportback offers slightly more range – reaching up to 141 km, about 24 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover.
Range Rover
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover offers visibly more power – delivering 615 HP compared to 400 HP. That’s roughly 215 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A3 Sportback is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Land Rover Range Rover takes 4.5 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover delivers noticeably more torque with 800 Nm compared to 500 Nm. That’s about 300 Nm more.
A3 Sportback
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Land Rover Range Rover offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Audi A3 Sportback is considerably lighter – 1,360 kg compared to 2,504 kg. The difference is around 1,144 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover offers clearly more boot space – 818 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 438 L.
When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover carries clearly more – 846 kg compared to 480 kg. That’s a difference of about 366 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi A3 Sportback is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £27,000
Audi A3 Sportback
Audi A3 Sportback
Land Rover Range Rover
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi A3 Sportback
The Audi A3 Sportback wraps premium materials and crisp German design into a practical hatchback package that makes daily driving feel smart rather than showy. It’s nimble in the city, composed on longer trips, and carries just enough swagger to satisfy buyers who want quality without shouting about it.
details
Land Rover Range Rover
The Range Rover wraps unabashed luxury and genuine off-road capability into a silhouette that still manages to look effortlessly elegant whether parked outside a city hotel or splashing through a muddy trail. Inside, it’s a cocoon of soft leathers, refined materials and serene ride quality that makes long journeys feel like private-jet comfort — ideal for buyers who want a plush cruiser that can also go where lesser SUVs won’t.
details
Audi A3 Sportback
Land Rover Range Rover
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27,000 - 56,600 £
|
Price
122,700 - 244,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.1 - 9.3 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.7 - 11.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
134 - 141 km
|
Electric Range
116 - 117 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
19.7 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
25 - 211 g/km
|
co2
62 - 265 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
40 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Off-Roader
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,360 - 1,685 kg
|
Curb weight
2,504 - 2,810 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
280 - 380 L
|
Trunk capacity
212 - 818 L
|
|
Length
4,352 - 4,353 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,816 - 1,851 mm
|
Width
2,047 mm
|
|
Height
1,441 - 1,470 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,100 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
410 - 480 kg
|
Payload
589 - 846 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 400 HP
|
Power HP
300 - 615 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 10.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 6.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
225 - 237 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
220 - 500 Nm
|
Torque
650 - 800 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 5
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
|
Power kW
85 - 294 kW
|
Power kW
221 - 452 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 2,480 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,997 - 4,395 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, F, E, G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, G
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.