Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Audi A3 Sportback vs Skoda Superb Combi comparison
Compare performance (400 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (27,000 £ vs 36,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi A3 Sportback or Skoda Superb Combi?
Audi A3 Sportback vs Skoda Superb Combi: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
A3 Sportback
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Audi A3 Sportback is markedly cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the Skoda Superb Combi costs 36,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,085 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi A3 Sportback uses 1.1 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Skoda Superb Combi with 1.2 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Audi A3 Sportback offers barely more range – reaching up to 141 km, about 4 km more than the Skoda Superb Combi.
Superb Combi
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi A3 Sportback offers visibly more power – delivering 400 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 135 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A3 Sportback is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Skoda Superb Combi takes 5.7 s. That’s about 1.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi A3 Sportback delivers slightly more torque with 500 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm more.
A3 Sportback
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Audi A3 Sportback is a bit lighter – 1,360 kg compared to 1,575 kg. The difference is around 215 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Superb Combi offers clearly more boot space – 690 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 310 L.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Superb Combi carries moderately more – 584 kg compared to 480 kg. That’s a difference of about 104 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi A3 Sportback stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £27,000
Audi A3 Sportback
Audi A3 Sportback
Skoda Superb Combi
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi A3 Sportback
The Audi A3 Sportback wraps premium materials and crisp German design into a practical hatchback package that makes daily driving feel smart rather than showy. It’s nimble in the city, composed on longer trips, and carries just enough swagger to satisfy buyers who want quality without shouting about it.
details
Skoda Superb Combi
The Skoda Superb Combi is the practical hero of the estate world, offering cavernous space and a calm, refined ride that makes family life feel effortless. Its clever features, understated design and no-nonsense value make it a smart pick for buyers who want Germanic engineering without the badge premium — and it even manages to stay surprisingly stylish while doing all the heavy lifting.
details
Audi A3 Sportback
Skoda Superb Combi
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27,000 - 92,900 £
|
Price
36,100 - 52,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.1 - 9.3 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.2 - 7.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
134 - 141 km
|
Electric Range
128 - 137 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
25 - 211 g/km
|
co2
28 - 178 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,360 - 1,685 kg
|
Curb weight
1,575 - 1,853 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
280 - 380 L
|
Trunk capacity
510 - 690 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,816 - 1,851 mm
|
Width
1,849 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
410 - 480 kg
|
Payload
497 - 584 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 400 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 10.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
220 - 500 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 5
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 294 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 2,480 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, F, E, G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, G, B
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Skoda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.