Compare performance (400 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (27,000 £ vs 42,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi A3 Sportback or Volvo S60?
In the ever-evolving landscape of automotive engineering, choice is abundant. Today, we delve into a spirited comparison between two distinct vehicles: the Audi A3 Sportback and the Volvo S60. Each brings forth unique attributes in style, performance, and technology, catering to different preferences and driving experiences.
The Audi A3 Sportback offers a versatile range of engine options, from petrol to plugin hybrid, with a power spectrum stretching from 116 to an impressive 400 HP. Its acceleration varies across the models, achieving 0-100 km/h in a zippy 3.8 to 10.1 seconds, while maintaining a fuel efficiency of 5.4 to 9.3 L/100km, and a noteworthy electric range of up to 143 km.
Contrasting with the Audi is the Volvo S60, available in petrol MHEV and plugin hybrid variants, producing a power output ranging from 197 to 455 HP. The S60's acceleration from 0-100 km/h spans between 4.6 and 7.9 seconds, with fuel consumption figures of 6.1 to 7.1 L/100km and an electric range of 94 km. Despite Volvo's lower range, its fuel efficiency and refinement remain commendable.
True to its Hatchback form, the Audi A3 Sportback stands at a length of approximately 4381 mm, a width of 1851 mm, and a height ranging from 1415 to 1470 mm. It's compact yet spacious, maximizing its 5-door configuration.
The Volvo S60, as a sedan, exudes elegance with its longer frame, measuring 4778 mm in length, 1850 mm in width, and a height of 1431 mm. Its 4-door design emphasizes sophistication and comfort, balancing passenger space with sleek styling.
Audi continues to innovate with features such as a dual-clutch automatic transmission and the option for an all-wheel-drive system, thereby enhancing driving dynamics and control.
Volvo, synonymous with safety, integrates advanced driver-assistance systems and hybrid innovations, ensuring a reduced carbon footprint alongside high-performance metrics.
Both vehicles provide ample seating for five passengers. The A3 Sportback’s trunk capacity ranges from 282 to 380 liters, offering flexibility for lifestyle needs.
The S60 leads slightly in practicality with a trunk capacity of 390 to 427 liters, enabling more storage space while maintaining luxury and comfort.
Ultimately, the choice between the Audi A3 Sportback and Volvo S60 boils down to individual preference. The A3 Sportback appeals to those seeking versatility and compact agility, while the S60 provides a sophisticated and secure driving experience, wrapped in Scandinavian excellence. Both are exemplary in their categories, marrying performance with modern innovations.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Audi A3 Sportback is clearly cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the Volvo S60 costs 42,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15,514 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo S60 uses 0.7 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Audi A3 Sportback with 1.1 L/100km. The difference is about 0.4 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Audi A3 Sportback offers clearly more range – reaching up to 141 km, about 47 km more than the Volvo S60.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo S60 offers moderately more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 400 HP. That’s roughly 55 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A3 Sportback is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Volvo S60 takes 4.6 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Audi A3 Sportback is noticeably faster – reaching 237 km/h, while the Volvo S60 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 57 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo S60 delivers visibly more torque with 709 Nm compared to 500 Nm. That’s about 209 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Audi A3 Sportback is visibly lighter – 1,360 kg compared to 1,715 kg. The difference is around 355 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Volvo S60 offers moderately more boot space – 427 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 47 L.
When it comes to payload, the Audi A3 Sportback carries very slightly more – 480 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 5 kg.
The Audi A3 Sportback has only a minor advantage in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Audi A3 Sportback wraps premium materials and crisp German design into a practical hatchback package that makes daily driving feel smart rather than showy. It’s nimble in the city, composed on longer trips, and carries just enough swagger to satisfy buyers who want quality without shouting about it.
details
The Volvo S60 wears Scandinavian understatement like a tailored suit, pairing a serene cabin with composed handling that makes the daily commute feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers after executive looks, rock‑solid safety and practical versatility — with a dash of discreet luxury — it's a persuasive pick that doesn't need to shout for attention.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27,000 - 56,600 £
|
Price
42,500 - 65,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.1 - 9.3 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
0.7 - 7.1 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
134 - 141 km
|
Electric Range
94 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
19.7 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
14.7 kWh
|
|
co2
25 - 211 g/km
|
co2
16 - 161 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
40 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
60 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
1,360 - 1,685 kg
|
Curb weight
1,715 - 2,039 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
280 - 380 L
|
Trunk capacity
390 - 427 L
|
|
Length
4,352 - 4,353 mm
|
Length
4,778 mm
|
|
Width
1,816 - 1,851 mm
|
Width
1,850 mm
|
|
Height
1,441 - 1,470 mm
|
Height
1,431 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,100 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
410 - 480 kg
|
Payload
461 - 475 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 400 HP
|
Power HP
197 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 10.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
225 - 237 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
220 - 500 Nm
|
Torque
300 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 5
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 294 kW
|
Power kW
145 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 2,480 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, F, E, G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, B
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España