Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Audi A4 Avant vs SsangYong Rexton comparison
Compare performance (470 HP vs 202 HP), boot space and price (37,200 £ vs 41,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi A4 Avant or SsangYong Rexton?
Audi A4 Avant vs SsangYong Rexton: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
A4 Avant
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Audi A4 Avant is moderately cheaper – starting at 37,200 £ , while the SsangYong Rexton costs 41,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,892 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi A4 Avant uses 4.8 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the SsangYong Rexton with 8.2 L/100km. The difference is about 3.4 L/100km.
Rexton
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi A4 Avant offers considerably more power – delivering 470 HP compared to 202 HP. That’s roughly 268 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A4 Avant is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.7 s, while the SsangYong Rexton takes 10.6 s. That’s about 6.9 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Audi A4 Avant is visibly faster – reaching 300 km/h, while the SsangYong Rexton tops out at 184 km/h. The difference is around 116 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi A4 Avant delivers visibly more torque with 600 Nm compared to 441 Nm. That’s about 159 Nm more.
A4 Avant
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: SsangYong Rexton offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Audi A4 Avant is clearly lighter – 1,595 kg compared to 2,145 kg. The difference is around 550 kg.
Looking at boot space, the SsangYong Rexton offers clearly more boot space – 784 L compared to 495 L. That’s a difference of about 289 L.
For maximum load capacity, the SsangYong Rexton offers markedly more capacity – up to 1,977 L, about 482 L more than the Audi A4 Avant.
When it comes to payload, the SsangYong Rexton carries noticeably more – 770 kg compared to 565 kg. That’s a difference of about 205 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi A4 Avant stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £37,200
Audi A4 Avant
Audi A4 Avant
SsangYong Rexton
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi A4 Avant
The Audi A4 Avant blends elegant, understated styling with practical estate versatility, making it a polished choice for drivers who want both poise and generous cargo space. Inside, the cabin feels premium and tech-forward while the composed driving manners turn routine journeys into a quietly satisfying experience—exactly the sensible indulgence buyers will appreciate.
details
SsangYong Rexton
The SsangYong Rexton is a no-nonsense full-size SUV that pairs rugged, go-anywhere bones with a surprisingly plush cabin, making it an appealing choice for buyers who want capability without premium-brand prices. It won’t turn heads like a luxury badge, but its generous space, sensible features and honest practicality make it a smart, down-to-earth family hauler — a savvy pick if you value substance over status.
details
Audi A4 Avant
SsangYong Rexton
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
37,200 - 122,500 £
|
Price
41,100 - 51,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 9.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
8.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
126 - 220 g/km
|
co2
214 - 216 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
40 - 58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Estate
|
Body Type
Off-Roader
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,595 - 1,820 kg
|
Curb weight
2,145 - 2,180 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
495 L
|
Trunk capacity
236 - 784 L
|
|
Length
4,750 - 4,782 mm
|
Length
4,850 mm
|
|
Width
1,842 - 1,866 mm
|
Width
1,960 mm
|
|
Height
1,428 - 1,493 mm
|
Height
1,825 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,495 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,806 - 1,977 L
|
|
Payload
510 - 565 kg
|
Payload
655 - 770 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 - 470 HP
|
Power HP
202 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.7 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
210 - 300 km/h
|
Max Speed
184 km/h
|
|
Torque
270 - 600 Nm
|
Torque
441 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
100 - 346 kW
|
Power kW
148 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,968 - 2,894 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,157 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
|
Model Year
2,021 - 2,023
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
SsangYong
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.