Compare performance (639 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (40,200 £ vs 67,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi A5 Sportback or Ford Transit Transporter?
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Audi A5 Sportback is substantially cheaper – starting at 40,200 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 27,109 £.
As for electric range, the Ford Transit Transporter offers substantially more range – reaching up to 402 km, about 292 km more than the Audi A5 Sportback.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi A5 Sportback offers substantially more power – delivering 639 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 370 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi A5 Sportback delivers substantially more torque with 825 Nm compared to 430 Nm. That’s about 395 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
The Audi A5 Sportback comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Audi A5 Sportback dresses up sleek coupe proportions with the everyday sense of a practical hatchback, so you get striking looks without the compromises. Behind the wheel it balances poise and comfort with premium trimmings that make daily driving feel a little bit special — ideal for buyers who want style and substance in equal measure.
detailsThe Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
40,200 - 91,000 £
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2 - 7.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
84 - 110 km
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
45 - 172 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,770 - 2,430 kg
|
Curb weight
-
|
|
Trunk capacity
331 - 445 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,860 - 1,952 mm
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
475 - 530 kg
|
Payload
-
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 639 HP
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.7 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
280 - 825 Nm
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
110 - 470 kW
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,968 - 2,995 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Ford
|