Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Audi e-tron GT vs MG Cyberster - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (843 HP vs 510 HP), boot space and price (93300 £ vs 55700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi e-tron GT or MG Cyberster?
e-tron GT
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
MG Cyberster has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 55700 £ , while the Audi e-tron GT costs 93300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 37637 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the MG Cyberster: with 16.70 kWh per 100 km, it’s slight more efficient than the Audi e-tron GT with 17.90 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.20 kWh.
As for electric range, the Audi e-tron GT performs a bit better – achieving up to 617 km, about 110 km more than the MG Cyberster.
e-tron GT
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi e-tron GT has a distinct edge – offering 843 HP compared to 510 HP. That’s roughly 333 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi e-tron GT is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 2.90 s, while the MG Cyberster takes 3.20 s. That’s about 0.30 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Audi e-tron GT pulls evident stronger with 1027 Nm compared to 725 Nm. That’s about 302 Nm difference.
e-tron GT
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Audi e-tron GT offers clearly more seating capacity – 4 vs 2.
In curb weight, MG Cyberster is distinct lighter – 1960 kg compared to 2355 kg. The difference is around 395 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Audi e-tron GT offers decisively more room – 405 L compared to 200 L. That’s a difference of about 205 L.
When it comes to payload, Audi e-tron GT significantly takes the win – 485 kg compared to 150 kg. That’s a difference of about 335 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi e-tron GT holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Audi e-tron GT
MG Cyberster
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £93,300
Audi e-tron GT
Audi e-tron GT
The Audi e-tron GT is a striking electric grand tourer that blends dramatic, low-slung styling with the hushed refinement of a luxury saloon. Behind the beautiful skin you'll find a driver-focused cabin and brisk, silent performance that makes daily commutes feel like auditioning for a weekend road trip — and yes, it manages to be both serious and a little bit smug about it.
details
MG Cyberster
The Cyberster is a striking new addition to the electric vehicle landscape, captivating enthusiasts with its sleek design and sporty silhouette. This all-electric convertible combines innovative technology with an exhilarating driving experience, making it a standout choice for those who crave adventure. With its commitment to sustainability and performance, the Cyberster is poised to redefine the way we think about modern roadsters.
details
Audi e-tron GT
MG Cyberster
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
93300 - 137600 £
|
Price
55700 - 60000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.9 - 19 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 19.1 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
582 - 617 km
|
Electric Range
443 - 507 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
97 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Coupe
|
Body Type
Roadster
|
|
Seats
4
|
Seats
2
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2355 - 2395 kg
|
Curb weight
1960 - 2060 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
350 - 405 L
|
Trunk capacity
200 L
|
|
Length
4997 - 5004 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1964 mm
|
Width
1913 mm
|
|
Height
1379 - 1394 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
455 - 485 kg
|
Payload
150 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
503 - 843 HP
|
Power HP
340 - 510 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
2.9 - 4.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.2 - 5.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
245 - 250 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
625 - 1027 Nm
|
Torque
475 - 725 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
370 - 620 kW
|
Power kW
250 - 375 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
MG
|
Is the Audi e-tron GT offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.